>From ma128@fim.uni-erlangen.deTue Sep 5 17:17:56 1995 MUSIC IN RIGA TOWARDS THE END OF THE 16TH CENTURY AND PAULUS BUCENUS PHILORODUS by Paul Madgwick Universitaet Erlangen ma128@fim.uni-erlangen.de When the Soviet Union disintegrated many of the barriers to the movement of foreign artistes around eastern Europe disappeared and many specialists in renaissance music had the opportunity to perform and teach in the Baltic States. The repertoire that these visiting artistes brought with them is of course the repertoire that has been thoroughly researched in the last half century from Italy, France, England and Germany. A very commonly asked question by these visiting artistes when in the Baltic States is what about your own repertoire? When I tried to answer this question for Riga I found that the standard musical text books were also of no use. Even looking through a shelf full of standard text books on Renaissance music in some of the most comprehensive libraries in England and Germany, I could find nothing of significance about Riga. In most not even an entry in the index. Try looking up any other town of similar importance in history, e.g. Luebeck or Copenhagen or Antwerp and you will find an informative article, pages of details with musical examples, who the composers were, where they worked, how much they were paid, by whom etc. etc. When and why did Riga cease to exist in the musical world? I followed up the references which were given in the very few encyclopedia articles that I found and the first report of any significance I found was by Elmar Arro writing in the journal "Musik des Ostens"1. He remarked on precisely the same theme but in the slightly broader context of the whole Baltic. His question was "why has the Baltic been abolished from music history?". Arro's article contains a number of very useful references foremost among them being the articles by Nicholas Busch, the former director of the Riga Town Library.2 Nicholas Busch seems to have been a catalyst for research into the musical life of Riga, at the beginning of the 20th century. Through his efforts, other musicologists of the time became involved in the study of the music of that area. Among these were Perl, who wrote a very informative article about Jakob Lotichus, Daniel Kahde and Kaspar Springer, all musicians in 17th century Riga.3 Gerhard von Keussler, who researched the Riga cantor, Paulus Bucenus Philorodus;4 and Ziesemer, who commented on a piece of music found in a law report dated 1653 in the archives of the law courts of Dorpat (now Tartu, Estonia).5 Among the lines of research that Nicholas Busch did not complete is the research into the musician, Martin Crusius of Meissen.6 One of his works was in the archives of the Blackheads association in Riga before the war.7 By far the most informative study useful in the piecing together of the music of 16th century Riga is the dissertation by Gunnar Larsson written in 1961 "Studies of Riga's Music History during the polish period (1582-1621)".8 The next author I would like to mention is Stura Hemming, of the Baltic Institute in Stockholm, who presented a paper during the third conference in Baltic studies in Scandinavia in 1975 entitled "The Riga Cantor: Paul Bucenus and his opus musicum ecclesiae Rigensis".9 This paper is useful in that it summarises the sources of the works of Bucenus that were known at that time. Unfortunately, this paper is not widely available or indexed and was not revealed in various literature searches which I conducted in Germany. As the starting point for gathering repertoire I took the works of Paulus Bucenus, the Riga cantor, 1578-1586. He also is the only one of the few Riga composers who has any entry in the major international catalogues of music source material. The RISM catalogue of music prints lists incomplete copies of Bucenus' St. Matthew Passion10 in Vaesteras11, Uppsala12, Wroclaw13 and Wolfenbuettel14. Eitner's source index15 gives three extra sources including two printed copies, one at Brieg and the other in Elbing and a manuscript copy in Vienna. Subsequent investigations showed that the copy supposedly in Brieg was the one in Wroclaw and of the library at Elbing was destroyed in the war. What remains of the Bucenus part books is now in Torun University16. The supposed manuscript copy in Vienna could not be found. A further manuscript was located in the Latvian Academic Library in Riga, apparently copied out in the early twentieth century. The part-books of the St. Matthew passion found were all from the same edition, the title page of which reads: "Passio Domini nostri Jesu Christi, musicis numeris exonata, in usum ecclisiae Rigensis, a Paulo Buceno Philorodo, Scholae Rigensis Cantore. Stetini LXXVIII". The works was printed in Stettin by Andreas Kelner. Some writers have attempted to read some significance into this fact concluding that Bucenus must have had some special contact with that city.17 Evidence of this is the appearance of one of his motets and two of his masses in a collection offered by the town council Cantor Paul Praetorius to the Stettin town council in 1594.18 It must be born in mind that Riga had no printers at the time and Kelner in Stettin was clearly active in printing Lutheran material.19 A combination of the copies of the Stettin prints from all sources gave all voices complete and it was therefore possible to produce a modern edition of this work. Since then a further copy has been found in the Archive of the Society of Friend's of Music in Vienna and so has a manuscript score written out by their former archive director Eusebius Mandyczewski. I also note that the recently published index of the Bartfeld Collection in the National Library of Budapest in Hungary also has a manuscript copy of the work. The modern edition was launched just in time for Easter 1995 by "Musica Baltica" in Riga. A recent review described the piece as being very dramatic despite emphasis on homorhythmic textual declamation and simple chords20. This review was in contrast to a rather critical commentary on the work written by O. Kade in 1893 in which he accuses Bucenus of avoiding all expressiveness. It is apparent from Kade's work however, that he was not in possession of a full set of part books.21 The question was then whether any other material written by Paul Bucenus that is sufficiently complete to be reconstructed. The most extensive source of his work which is referred to in both Eitner's Quellenlexikon and Grove's dictionary is the so-called Poelchau manuscript, Berlin Mus.Ms 40074. This consists of two volumes, both of which are incomplete. The first survives as two part-books (cantus and tenor) out of six containing a large number of motets, some of which bear dedications to politicians of Bucenus' time. The introduction gives an insight into the situation at that time. The second volume has survived only as cantus, tenor and bass and contains twenty-four masses and various other pieces for the church year. The pieces are for four to eight parts and therefore no single one is complete. The Poelchau manuscript is of considerable importance, because it enables us to attribute Bucenus' pieces to him wherever they are found in other collections. Several collections containing Bucenus' work are identified in the literature. One of the major sources is the collection of the former town library in Breslau (Wroclaw). This collection disappeared during the war. A major portion of the collection was returned from Moscow to east Berlin during the 1950s and is now accessible in the Eastern part of Prussian culture collection in the Berlin State Library. It is catalogued according to the 19th century catalogue compiled by E. Bohn22. Before the War this Breslau collection contained three items with works by Paul Bucenus; these were Ms15, Ms 97 and Ms 100. Ms 15 and 97 are both now in Berlin, but Ms 100 is missing. Gerhard von Keussler writing in the 1930s in a footnote to an article on Paul Bucenus wrote "I have arranged to have two motets by Bucenus copied in Breslau and will report on them at the next opportunity". Von Keussler wrote no more articles and therefore the question was raised what happened to the copies? After von Keussler had written his article, he moved to Australia. He then returned to Germany and lived near Berlin and died in the early 1950's23. After his death, his papers were given to the Goethe-Schiller Archive in Weimar, including photographs24 made in Breslau a lot of private correspondence between von Keussler and Busch25. The correspondence includes long arguments between von Keussler and Busch about where Bucenus was born, why he composed in the way he did and all the questions posed by von Keussler during the research for his article. The correspondence also describes the copying of the Breslau St. Matthew Passion part books in the early thirties, i.e. the copies now in the Latvian Academic Library. Comparing the photographs with copies from Breslau Ms 15 and Ms 97 which were available in Berlin, it was clear that the photos were from Breslau Ms 100. Item No. 7 in Ms 97 and No. 1 in Ms 100 are the Kyrie and Gloria of the six-voice Mass, "Super Iam non Dicam." This mass is based on the eight-voice motet "Iam non Dicam" by the Flemish composer, Dominique Phinot26. The Mass also appears in the Poelchau manuscript, Berlin Ms Mus 40074, Vol. 2 No. 5 but only as Cantus, Tenor and Bassus although in that source it also includes Sanctus and Agnus Dei, both with Latin texts. A modern edition of this work is now in preparation. Breslau Ms 15 contains five out of six voices of the motet, "Vitam quae faciunt beatiorem" which could be confirmed as genuine by comparison with the Poelchau manuscript. The missing voice of this item can be supplied from a set of part-books in the Vaesteras Town Library27. The Vaesteras part-books were copied by a rather careless scribe and therefore the main difficulty is to sort out copying errors. Luckily there are no significant other differences between the two sources. A further source of this piece is call mark i.hs 76g at Uppsala University. "Vitam quae faciunt beatiorem" is a rather interesting motet in that its first phrase follows exactly both the text and the musical setting of a secular work by the Flemish composer, Jacques Arcadelt28. Arcadelt's text is by the ancient Roman poet, Martial. The melody is however from the hymn "Gaudete, Gaudete Christus Natus Est" which also appears in Piae Cantiones, a work collected by two Finns, Jako Finno and Theodorikes Petri Rootar, and published in Greifswald 158229. The Martial text used by Jacques Arcadelt reads as follows: The things that make life more blessed my dear Martial are these: Money obtained not by work but inherited, not unproductive land, an unfailing fireplace, no law suits, a gown rarely worn, a mind at peace, a gentleman's strength, a healthy body ...30. This text had already been set in 1558 by the Flemish composer, Jacobus Vaet. Such a sentiment as to gain money without work would certainly not be in line with strict Lutheran sentiment so in Bucenus' setting he switches into the text of Psalm 127 (128) exactly at the point where the Martial text mentions money obtained not by work. The corresponding passage in the Psalm is "let your food be the product of the labour of your hands". The remainder of the text follows a paraphrase of the Psalm text. Another similar example of the use of Martial's opening is found in a motet from 1568 by Christian Hollander, who, follows it by the ten Commandments. The motet "Vitam quae faciunt beatiorem" is in two parts, the second part beginning with the words "sic fidus benedicitur maritus". The text however is continuous through the two parts. Another motet which can be readily re-constructed is the five voice setting of "Converte Domine". This is indexed in Eitner's Quellenlexikon under a misspelling of the composer's name. A comparison with the Poelchau manuscript confirmed that the copies listed in Eitner as being in Zwickau were indeed by Paul Bucenus Philorodus31. The source is complete. A further source containing two voices of the motet is Berlin Ms 40210 No. 53. The text of the motet is from Psalm 125 (126) "Convert O Lord our Captivity. Those who sow in tears will reap in Exultation." Most striking about this piece is the word painting, particularly in the setting of "Qui seminant in lachrymis". The only remaining work identified as being by Paulus Bucenus in sources other than in the Poelchau manuscript is "Tota pulcra es" in Dresden32. This regrettably survives only as a bass voice, thus making a total of only three out of the original six voices when taken together with the voices in Ms 40074. Clearly more work is necessary to comb through the hundreds of collected volumes throughout north and eastern Europe The next question to address is what do we know about the life of Paulus Bucenus and the institutions in which he worked? Two pieces of evidence exist concerning Bucenus' origin. The first evidence is his name; Paulus Bucenus Philorodus. Butzen is a small town in Germany just south of Frankfurt an der Oder. The closest major town is Liebrose. Translating the syllables "Lieb" and "Rose" individually into Greek produces Philorhodus. The second is his entry in the matriculation lists of Greifswald University, where he is identified as "Paulus Bucenus, Philorhodus, Holsata" indicating that he came from Holstein.33 In correspondence between Gerhard von Keussler and Nikolaus Busch it was pointed out that Bucenus may have indicated that he was from Holstein and thus relatively local to Greifswald University in order to obtain the free scholarship to that university.34 Certainly the co-incidence of proximity of Butzen and Liebrose is too great to ignore. A check of the Potsdam Staatsarchiv, where the records of Liebrose are kept has revealed a family Butzena in Liebrose at the relevant time, but nothing more conclusive. An investigation of the records of Holstein, may cast further light on this issue. The next trace of Paulus Bucenus comes from two letters in the archives of the Gymnasium at Thorn (now Torun, Poland).35 Both of these letter are complaints by Bucenus about his pay while in the service of the school. In one of the letters Bucenus mentions that he is not receiving as much pay as he had in previous employment with the Hauptmann von Soldau. The Soldau referred to may be the town between Koenigsberg and Warsaw, now called Dzialdowo. Also of possible relevance is the fact that the founder of the school Heinrick Strohband married Catherine Soldau on 9th May 1574. Bucenus' position in Thorn is somewhat of a mystery. He signs the letters "Paulus Bucenus Philorodus Cantor". The school was, however, founded in 1568 with a staff of 10 including a cantor Andreas Thulmeiner. Thulmeiner remained in office until 1573. He was succeeded by Georg Oppel in 1574, who remained in the post until 1600.36 There would therefore appear to have been no time during which Paulus Bucenus could have occupied the post of cantor. The cantor was however assisted by a succentor whose duties were to conduct the mass and vespers as well as provide music for simple funerals.37 It is possible that Bucenus occupied that position during the time that Thulmeiner or Oppel was the actual cantor. A further study in the archives of the School held both in the Torun Town library 38 and the town archives 39 will be necessary to resolve this question. The school at which he taught in Torun was of a remarkable similar structure to the cathedral school where he spent the end of his career in Riga.40 Returning to his life in Riga, the Padel diaries give the date of Bucenus' marriage as 29th September 1583 and his death as 15th February 1586.41 Viecken's "Short description"42 talks about the performance of music at the time of the entry of the King, Stephen of Poland in 1581. "On the gate was the Cantor with his boys and the instruments; and the Cantor had composed the piece that was sung and was played on the instruments to honour the King." The Cantor referred to could easily have been Paulus Bucenus Philorodus as the first item in the Poelchau manuscript is a greeting to King Stephen "Vivat Stephanus Rex Poloniae pater Patriae" So far we have considered essentially vocal music. The introduction to the Poelchau manuscript however reads "Some sacred songs for six voices in three kinds of counterpoint arranged with musical instruments and most suitable for schools....". In Viecken's "Short Decription" instruments are also mentioned. More details on this point can be found in two files in the Latvian State archives.43 which contain the papers relating to engagement and licensing of musicians by the Riga council. Only the first few papers of the first file come from the 16th century. These show that at the time that Paulus Bucenus Philorodus was cantor, Johann Lichtwer and his four journeyman were the official town musicians. Johann Lichtwers's duties and rate of pay are set out in a "Bestallungs Urkunde" dated February 1575. The first duty listed involved working with the cantor and his boys in the evening and early mass. Lichtwer's duties were redefined in 1592 and concentrated more on the duties of fire watch and protection in time of war. Again there is mention of playing in "both churches", presumably St. Peters and the Dom. Pages 27-28 from file 1184 is interesting as it is a list of music and instruments in the possession of the town musicians in 1634. Further line for investigation are the records of the guilds and the Blackheads society44. In the field of sacred music it must not be forgotten that their was a Jesuit presence in Riga from 1582, which brought with it music.45 Clearly a great deal of work still needs to be done. REFERENCES 1. Arro, Elmar "Die deutschbaltische Liedschule" in Musik des Ostens Vol. 3: pages 175-239; Marburg 1965. 2. Busch, Nikolaus see particularly "Zur Geschichte des Rigaer Musiklebens in 17. Jahrhundert." in Sitzungsbericht der Gesellschaft fuer Geschichte und Altertumskunde der Ostseeprovinzen Russlands aus der Jahre 1910 pages 25-32; Riga 1910 and "Alt-Rigas Musikkultur" in Baltische Monatshefte Vol. 11: pages 642-654; Riga November 1937. For a full list of Busch's publications see Arbusow, Leonid "Nachgelassene Schriften von Dr. phil. h. c. Nikolaus Busch Stadtbibliothekar zu Riga" Riga 1934 3. Perl, Carl Johann "Drei Musiker des 17. Jahrhunderts in Riga" in Zeitschrift fuer Musikwissenschaft Vol. 12: pages 703-713; 1919 4. Keussler, Gerhard von "Paulus Bucaenus" in Abhandlungen der Herder-Gesellschaft und das Herder-Institut zu Riga Vol. 4 No.1: pages 1-20; G. Loeffler Riga 1931. 5. Ziesemer, Walter "Ein Beitrag zur Liedgeschichte des 17.Jahrhunderts. (Ein Dorpater Pasquill von Jahre 1653.)" in Zeitschrift fuer Volkskunde Vol. 1: pages 76-84; Berlin und Leipzig 1929 6. Goetz, Wilhelm letter in Latvian Academic Library dated 22 December 1931 to N. Busch explaining that the Meisen Crusius could not have had any obvious connection with a Tuebbingen Crusius. 7. Crusius (Misnicus), Martinus "Harmonia Sacra 6 voc. concinnata In laudem et Honorem ..." Riga 1596. A manuscript copy of this piece (probably early 20th century) is in the Latvian Academic Library the original was in the archive of the Riga Blackheads Society (call mark No. 40 Sammelband). 8. Larsson, Gunnar "Studier i rigas Musikhistoria under polska tiden (1582-1621)" Vren 1961 9. Hemming, Sture "Rigakantor Paulus Bucenus und sein Opus Musicum Ecclesiae" in Papers presented at The Third Conference on Baltic Studies in Scandinavia Vol. 2: pages 261-265; Stockholm 1977 10. Repertoire Interntional des Sources Musicales B 4860 11. Stadsbiblioteket 12. Uppsala University call mark Utl. vok. mus.tr.966 13. Wroclaw University call mark 51413 Muz 14. Wolfenbuettel Herzog August Library call mark 173 Musica div. 15. Eitner, Robert "Bucenus (Bucaenus), Paulus, Philorodus (ein Ort?) Scholae Rigensis Cantore." in Quellen Lexicon pages 221-222. 16. Torun University call mark Zboiry MuzyczUse of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at E:\listplex\SYSTEM\SCRIPTS\filearea.cgi line 455, line 476. ne V813 17. Kittler, Guenther "Die pommischen Notendrucke bis Ende des 17. Jahrhunderts (1. Teil)" in Musik in Pommern Vol. 4: pages 175-202; 1935 18. Schwartz, Rudolf "Der Stettiner Ratskantor Paul Praetorius (Schultz) 1520-1597)" in Gedenkboek aangeboden aan Dr. D. F. Scheurleer op zijn 70sten Verjaardag" s-Gravenhage 1925 p 288 and Ruhnke, Martin "Beitraege zu einer Geschichte der deutschen Hofmusikkollegien im 16. Jahrhundert" p 152 Berlin 1963. 19. Bake, Werner "Die Fruehzeit des pommerschen Buchdrucks" Pyritz 1934 Verzeichnis p 171. 20. Bartlett, Clifford "A Rigan Passion" in "Early Music Review", No. 12, England, July 1995 21. Kade, O. "Paulus Bucenus (Philorodus)" in Die Passionskompositionen pages 43-45; 1893. 22. Bohn, Emil "Die musikalischen Handschriften des XVI. und XVII. Jahrhunderts in der Stadtbibliothek zu Breslau", Breslau 1890. 23. Siemens, Egon "Gerhard von Keussler" (Obituary) in Musica Vol. 4: pages 210-211; 1950. See also the article by Kroll, Erwin "Keussler, Gerhard von" in Musik in Geschichte und Gegenwart Vol. 7: pages 867-869; Kassel 1949 24. Bucenus, Paulus "Missa Sex Vocum super Iam non dicam" Photographs from Ms Mus. 100 Breslau 1932. Goethe-Schiller Archive, Weimar call-mark: GSA 53/516 25. Keussler Busch correspondence Goethe-Schiller Archive, Weimar call-mark: GSA 531 826. Busch Keussler correspondence Goethe- Schiller Archive, Weimar call-mark: GSA 531 470 26. CMM Vol.IV, No. 15 27. Vaesteras Stadsbiblioteket, Ms 67 28. CMM Vol. viii Arcadelt - Opera Omnia 29. Petri Theodorici "Piae Cantiones Ecclesiasticae et Scholasticae ...." 1982 30. Martial Epigrams, Book X, No. 47 31. Zwickau Ratsschulbibliothek Sammelhandschrift 10 No. 330 32. Steude, Wolfram "Die Musiksammelhandschriften des 16 und 17 Jahrhunderts in der Saechsischen Landesbibliothek zu Dresden" and Mus. I/D/6 No. 87 33. Friedlaender, Ernst "Aeltere Universitaets- Matrikeln (Universitaet Greifswald)" in Publicationen aus den K. Preussischen Staatsarchiven Vol. 1: pages 292; Leipzig 1893 for lists students and teachers at Greifswald University. See also Pietzch, Gerhard "Zur Pflege der Musik an den deutschen Universitaeten bis zur Mitte des 16. Jahrhunderts" Darnstadt 1971. 34. Keussler/Busch correspondence from 1931 in Goethe-Schiller Archive, Weimar GSA 531 826; 531 470. 35. Waschinski, Emil "Das Thorner Stadt- und Landschulwesen vom Begin der Reformation bis zum Ende der polnischen Herrschaft" in Zeitschrift des Westpreussischen Geschichtsvereins Vol. 56: pages 1-133; Danzig 1916 and Torun X 4 No. 49 & X 2 No.59. 36. Lehnerdt A. "Fest program des Koeniglichen evangelischen Gymnasiums zu Thorn" Thorn 1868 pp 31-36. 37. Heuer R. "Das Thorner Gymnasium im Jahre 1600" Thorn 1918 38. Ul. Slowackiego 8, Torun. 39. Archiwum Panstwowe, Plac Rapackiego 4, 87-100 Torun. 40. Schweder, G. "Die alte Domschule und das daraus hervorgegangene Stadt-Gymnasium zu Riga" Riga 1910 gives details of the structure of the Cathedral School in Riga. 41. Padel, Caspar "Tagebuch" in Mittheilungen aus dem Gebiete der Geschichte Liv- Est und Kurlands Vol. 13: pages 386-391; Riga 1886. 42. Viecken, Gotthard "Kurtze Beschreibung was sich denkwurdieger zu Riga begeben und zu getragen von Anno 1521 bis Anno 1589." Latvian State Archives call-mark: Fond 4038 list 2 Nos 90, 90a, 92, 93, 94, 305, & 306. 43. Fond 673 Aeusseres Ratsarchiv" No. 1184 "Bestallung der Spielleute" continued in No. 246 "Musikanten und andere Kuenstler" 44. Latvian State Archive Fond 4922 45. See Larsson Gunnar cited above for a discussion of Jesuit material formerly in Riga and now in Uppsala University Library. (Ms. 88.)