|
|
Size
|
Re: Thesaurus suggestion
|
Wed, 29 Nov 2000 16:09:33 +0000 |
104 lines |
Re: subject element terminology
|
Wed, 29 Nov 2000 08:34:56 +0200 |
21 lines |
subject element terminology
|
Tue, 28 Nov 2000 22:29:30 +0000 |
178 lines |
test
|
Mon, 27 Nov 2000 14:54:25 -0500 |
12 lines |
RE: Thesaurus suggestion
|
Fri, 24 Nov 2000 09:50:09 -0000 |
140 lines |
Re: Thesaurus suggestion
|
Thu, 23 Nov 2000 20:41:01 -0500 |
120 lines |
Re: Thesaurus suggestion
|
Thu, 23 Nov 2000 08:54:59 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: Thesaurus suggestion
|
Thu, 23 Nov 2000 12:05:36 +1100 |
100 lines |
RE: Thesaurus suggestion
|
Wed, 22 Nov 2000 17:12:45 -0600 |
107 lines |
Re: Thesaurus suggestion
|
Wed, 22 Nov 2000 17:01:39 -0500 |
104 lines |
Re: Thesaurus suggestion
|
Wed, 22 Nov 2000 16:29:21 -0500 |
69 lines |
Re: Thesaurus suggestion
|
Wed, 22 Nov 2000 12:26:42 -0500 |
72 lines |
RE: Thesaurus suggestion
|
Wed, 22 Nov 2000 09:57:02 -0600 |
2228 lines |
RE: Thesaurus suggestion
|
Wed, 22 Nov 2000 10:42:13 -0500 |
82 lines |
RE: Thesaurus suggestion
|
Wed, 22 Nov 2000 17:13:13 +0200 |
36 lines |
Re: Thesaurus suggestion
|
Wed, 22 Nov 2000 15:07:26 +0100 |
57 lines |
Re: Thesaurus suggestion
|
Wed, 22 Nov 2000 12:30:03 +0000 |
85 lines |
Re: Thesaurus suggestion
|
Wed, 22 Nov 2000 11:59:49 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: AW: Thesaurus
|
Wed, 22 Nov 2000 08:43:26 +0800 |
41 lines |
Re: AW: Thesaurus
|
Tue, 21 Nov 2000 14:29:32 -0800 |
54 lines |
Thesaurus suggestion
|
Tue, 21 Nov 2000 17:54:11 EDT |
24 lines |
Addendum to previous Open Archives Meeting Announcement
|
Tue, 21 Nov 2000 13:27:22 -0500 |
34 lines |
Open Archives Initiative Open Meeting
|
Tue, 21 Nov 2000 11:29:54 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: AW: Thesaurus
|
Tue, 21 Nov 2000 12:16:22 +0000 |
150 lines |
AW: Thesaurus
|
Tue, 21 Nov 2000 11:00:41 +0100 |
92 lines |
Re:classification scheme
|
Tue, 21 Nov 2000 09:35:36 +0100 |
40 lines |
RE: classification scheme
|
Tue, 21 Nov 2000 08:07:15 +0200 |
43 lines |
Re: Thesaurus
|
Mon, 20 Nov 2000 14:03:46 -0500 |
137 lines |
Thesaurus
|
Mon, 20 Nov 2000 11:24:44 -0700 |
120 lines |
RE: classification scheme
|
Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:09:29 -0500 |
162 lines |
RE: classification scheme
|
Mon, 20 Nov 2000 10:30:05 -0500 |
126 lines |
RE: classification scheme
|
Mon, 20 Nov 2000 08:53:09 -0600 |
95 lines |
Re: classification scheme
|
Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:13:45 +0000 |
85 lines |
FW: classification scheme
|
Mon, 20 Nov 2000 10:26:11 -0000 |
74 lines |
Re: metadata and linking
|
Mon, 20 Nov 2000 10:15:36 GMT1BST |
32 lines |
Re: Thoughts on citations
|
Mon, 20 Nov 2000 09:52:24 GMT1BST |
94 lines |
Re: classification scheme
|
Mon, 20 Nov 2000 17:21:12 +1100 |
54 lines |
Re: classification scheme
|
Fri, 17 Nov 2000 17:05:42 -0500 |
161 lines |
Thoughts on citations
|
Fri, 17 Nov 2000 16:54:20 -0500 |
31 lines |
RE: classification scheme
|
Fri, 17 Nov 2000 16:37:37 -0000 |
121 lines |
Re: classification scheme
|
Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:08:12 -0500 |
78 lines |
metadata and linking
|
Fri, 17 Nov 2000 16:04:04 +0000 |
34 lines |
classification scheme
|
Fri, 17 Nov 2000 10:31:33 -0000 |
26 lines |
RE: Metadata DITLOs
|
Thu, 16 Nov 2000 08:39:30 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: question
|
Thu, 16 Nov 2000 10:03:40 +1000 |
52 lines |
Pics from DC8
|
Wed, 15 Nov 2000 17:22:50 -0600 |
28 lines |
RE: question
|
Thu, 16 Nov 2000 08:09:31 +1000 |
142 lines |
question
|
Thu, 16 Nov 2000 08:59:30 +1100 |
37 lines |
RE: question
|
Thu, 16 Nov 2000 08:55:35 +1100 |
118 lines |
Re: question
|
Wed, 15 Nov 2000 14:41:51 -0000 |
75 lines |
Re: question
|
Wed, 15 Nov 2000 19:52:51 +1000 |
59 lines |
Re: Special characters in meta tags?
|
Wed, 15 Nov 2000 08:53:31 +0100 (MET) |
113 lines |
Re: Special characters in meta tags?
|
Wed, 15 Nov 2000 06:26:31 +0000 (GMT) |
80 lines |
Re: Questions about RDF
|
Tue, 14 Nov 2000 23:49:25 +0000 (GMT) |
33 lines |
Special characters in meta tags?
|
Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:47:05 -0000 |
47 lines |
Re: question
|
Tue, 14 Nov 2000 09:53:13 -0600 |
49 lines |
question
|
Tue, 14 Nov 2000 10:16:11 -0500 (EST) |
32 lines |
Re: Questions about RDF
|
Tue, 14 Nov 2000 11:13:14 +0100 (MET) |
151 lines |
Questions about RDF
|
Tue, 14 Nov 2000 09:19:31 +0100 |
107 lines |
Re: A Question on Qualifiers
|
Mon, 13 Nov 2000 11:47:20 +0100 (MET) |
103 lines |
Re: Convincing others to use "pure" Dublin Core
|
Mon, 13 Nov 2000 08:57:54 +1100 |
77 lines |
Re: Convincing others to use "pure" Dublin Core
|
Fri, 10 Nov 2000 22:39:52 +0000 (GMT) |
68 lines |
Re: Convincing others to use "pure" Dublin Core
|
Fri, 10 Nov 2000 10:39:24 -0800 |
45 lines |
RE: Convincing others to use "pure" Dublin Core
|
Fri, 10 Nov 2000 13:25:38 -0500 |
77 lines |
Re: Do you manage your metadata?
|
Fri, 10 Nov 2000 12:15:54 -0500 (EST) |
50 lines |
A Question on Qualifiers
|
Fri, 10 Nov 2000 11:18:44 -0500 |
49 lines |
Convincing others to use "pure" Dublin Core
|
Fri, 10 Nov 2000 09:52:49 -0500 |
31 lines |
DC-8 Presentations
|
Fri, 10 Nov 2000 09:11:51 -0500 |
20 lines |
Administrative metadata
|
Fri, 10 Nov 2000 10:06:43 +1100 |
108 lines |
Do you manage your metadata?
|
Thu, 9 Nov 2000 15:45:53 +0100 |
70 lines |
Re: DC:Identifier.Citation
|
Tue, 7 Nov 2000 14:17:05 -0500 (EST) |
66 lines |
DC:Identifier.Citation
|
Tue, 07 Nov 2000 19:27:43 +0100 |
41 lines |
Unsubscribing info
|
Tue, 07 Nov 2000 15:56:33 GMT |
21 lines |
RE: Unsubscribing info
|
Tue, 7 Nov 2000 15:56:27 -0000 |
58 lines |
RE: FWD: RE: Identifier.Citation?
|
Tue, 7 Nov 2000 09:55:00 -0500 |
71 lines |
Re: Fwd: Re: Identifier.Citation?
|
Tue, 7 Nov 2000 08:26:20 +0000 |
79 lines |
Re: Fwd: Re: Identifier.Citation?
|
Mon, 06 Nov 2000 14:34:45 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: Dublin Core for cartographic materials
|
Mon, 06 Nov 2000 09:49:34 +0800 |
34 lines |
Dublin Core for cartographic materials
|
Wed, 1 Nov 2000 18:51:13 -0500 |
58 lines |
RE: Help Needed
|
Wed, 1 Nov 2000 10:56:00 -0500 |
29 lines |
Help Needed
|
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 19:09:33 -0600 |
33 lines |