Thank you for your very thoughtful email,
Jeremy.
I can’t claim to have any research
knowledge except a deep love of wells and a delight in their company. One thing
I have been wondering about has been the links between holy wells and Neolithic
smallholdings. I was visiting Alsia
well in Cornwall
one year, wondering why it was so isolated from any community. When the landowner
started to tell us about the recent discovery
of an ancient settlement on the nearby field, it all began to make more sense.
The well was in the perfect spot for that settlement.
I have also wondered why bowsenning has
only been mentioned amongst Cornish wells and no others in any other part of
the country. Indeed, the only other trace of similar practice I could find came
from Ethiopia,
which retained a spiritual interest in living waters for many centuries.
The recurring story of standing stones going down to the local holy well or
stream to drink also make me think there is link between marker stones for
roundbarrows or dolmens/quoits and the local sacred water site, which predates
the medieval veneration of holy
wells.
Best wishes
Sarah
From:
WATER TALK - the email discussion
list for springs and spas enthusiasts [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jeremy Harte
Sent: 26 March 2007 20:46
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Saints' Wells
Dear All,
Perhaps a bit late to respond to this thread, but I've been mulling
over James' suggestion that there used to be more saints' wells in England than
there are now, and I wonder if that's right. If anything, there may have been fewer saints' wells in England at
any given time in the Middle Ages than there are now, given that nobody then
was doing the kind of archival searches for which we are now grateful
to James.
This thought was triggered by a long day spent in in the Edwardian gravitas
of Bristol Central Library - marvellous building,
helpful people - where I was following up some references in Phil Quinn's book.
Bristol has a lcreditable
tradition of topography, going back
to William Worcestre, who would climb down a vertical cliff face to
inspect St. Vincent's Cave and
was clearly not the sort of chap to neglect a holy well if he saw one. It
has also had repeated modern studies
of its mediaeval layout. But for
that, we have only three holy wells: St. Edith's
(the one which is at Stourhead now), St. Mary's, and a single reference to
Pithay Pump being called Hollywell.
Bristol is England's second city, unless you come from York... there's a useful
league ranking in Bob Hoskins' Local
History in England p176, based on two sets of C14 tax quotas.
If you combine these, the top six cities in England
come out as Bristol/ York,
Lincoln, Norwich,
Newcastle, and Salisbury. As far as I can see, the others
were all much like Bristol,
with three or so holy wells in the city. The next six in ranking include
Shrewsbury with three, Oxford with two (well, three if you count Holywell in
the suburbs) and Coventry with one (assuming that St. Catherine's is mediaeval) but also Kings Lynn, Boston and Great
Yarmouth which, to the best of my knowledge, didn't
have any holy wells at all.
Stamford, as it happens,
comes in fortieth in the ranking, being rather less than a quarter the size of Bristol. I would guess
that where other religious provision is concerned - churches, chapels, guilds
etc. - Bristol did
have slightly over four times as many as Stamford.
But I find it hard to believe that it had 24 holy wells, and that 21
of them have just vanished from the record without trace.
Another thing: several of the holy wells in these old cities are known
from one reference only. There seems to be just the one record of the St.
Mary's Well in Bristol, or St. Mary's in Southampton, or St. Martin's
in Winchester, or All Saints' Well in Colchester, and significantly these are
mentioned as reference points in abuttals of property, not as sources of
baptismal water or recipients of bequests. It looks very much as if 'St.
Martin's Well' means, not 'the well where we may be in touch with the power of
St. Martin', but 'that well in the ditch,
you know, the one near St. Martin's Church'. Pulchre Well in Leicester
is clearly the well near St. Sepulchre's; the Holy Sepulchre didn't, as it were, have any personal interest in
its waters.
Just because a well has a saint's name doesn't mean it had a saint's
cult (Tristan has made the same point in the past). It may be that the number
of culted wells has always
been very small, perhaps one or two in each county, but that in the nature of
things there cults come and go, and then we gather together all the evidence of
the centuries and say 'Ah, the Age of Faith! What a lot of holy wells
there must have been in those days'.
Well, it's a theory. What does anyone think?
Jeremy Harte
********************************************************************
The information contained in this
message is confidential and may be
legally privileged. The message is
intended solely for the addressee(s).
If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any
use, dissemination,
or reproduction is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the
sender by return e-mail and destroy
all copies of the original message.
Visit the Epsom
and Ewell Borough Council website at www.epsom-ewell.gov.uk
This footnote also confirms that this
e-mail message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of
computer viruses.
www.mimesweeper.com
********************************************************************