John,
Thanks for the previous code, it did exactly what I wanted in fewer steps.
However, I've started looking at individual participants and noticed that there is a much larger range of "probabilities" than with the traditional VBM. One participant has a maximum "probability" of about 2. Is this feasible? Would one expect a higher range? And finally, how does one interpret values over 1? Should this effect of being greater than 1 wash out across subjects?
Thanks.
--
Best Regards, Donald McLaren
=====================
D.G. McLaren
University of Wisconsin - Madison
Neuroscience Training Program
Tel: (773) 406 2464
=====================
This e-mail contains CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION which may contain PROTECTED HEALTHCARE INFORMATION and may also be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED and which is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of the e-mail is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are in possession of confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail unintentionally, please immediately notify the sender via telephone at (773) 406 2464 or email.
