JISCMail - WORDGRAMMAR Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

WORDGRAMMAR Archives

2000

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		WORDGRAMMAR Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	Date	Size
Re: "like that for" again	Sat, 30 Dec 2000 20:38:51 +0100	66 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Sat, 30 Dec 2000 01:42:06 -0000	143 lines
Re: "like that for" again	Sat, 30 Dec 2000 01:42:01 -0000	158 lines
Re: "like that for" again	Fri, 29 Dec 2000 00:36:44 +0100	124 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Thu, 28 Dec 2000 22:10:44 +0100	116 lines
Re: "like that for" again	Thu, 28 Dec 2000 16:48:49 -0000	151 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Tue, 26 Dec 2000 23:56:31 -0000	82 lines
expressive power of WG	Fri, 22 Dec 2000 09:18:02 +0000	34 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Fri, 22 Dec 2000 03:39:09 -0000	92 lines
Re: "like that for" again	Fri, 22 Dec 2000 03:39:06 -0000	53 lines
Re: Revised: The Gene out of the Bottle	Thu, 21 Dec 2000 22:05:31 +0100	24 lines
Re: "like that for" again	Thu, 21 Dec 2000 21:07:13 +0100	113 lines
Re: Revised: The Gene out of the Bottle	Thu, 21 Dec 2000 14:16:00 +0000	44 lines
Re: Revised: The Gene out of the Bottle	Thu, 21 Dec 2000 14:31:25 +0100	916 lines
Re: Revised: The Gene out of the Bottle	Thu, 21 Dec 2000 06:00:04 -0500	44 lines
Revised: The Gene out of the Bottle	Thu, 21 Dec 2000 11:22:06 +0100	23 lines
Re: "like that for" again	Wed, 20 Dec 2000 14:58:20 +0000	32 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Wed, 20 Dec 2000 13:22:42 +0000	33 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Wed, 20 Dec 2000 13:14:53 +0000	34 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Wed, 20 Dec 2000 09:24:49 +0000	39 lines
Re: "like that for" again	Tue, 19 Dec 2000 17:03:21 -0000	186 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Tue, 19 Dec 2000 17:03:17 -0000	30 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Tue, 19 Dec 2000 17:03:05 -0000	55 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Tue, 19 Dec 2000 08:53:29 +0100	35 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Mon, 18 Dec 2000 20:14:27 +0000	58 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Mon, 18 Dec 2000 20:05:56 +0100	32 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:45:42 +0000	76 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:35:51 +0000	19 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Mon, 18 Dec 2000 15:01:08 -0000	51 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Mon, 18 Dec 2000 14:56:21 +0100	62 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Mon, 18 Dec 2000 14:40:59 +0100	62 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Mon, 18 Dec 2000 14:05:58 +0100	41 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Mon, 18 Dec 2000 09:53:35 +0000	23 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Mon, 18 Dec 2000 09:32:28 +0000	70 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:55:15 +0000	41 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Sun, 17 Dec 2000 11:43:19 +0100	33 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Sat, 16 Dec 2000 20:31:09 -0000	106 lines
Re: "like that for" again	Sat, 16 Dec 2000 20:32:52 +0100	98 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Sat, 16 Dec 2000 20:30:24 +0100	63 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Sat, 16 Dec 2000 20:23:34 +0100	25 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Fri, 15 Dec 2000 19:32:13 -0000	53 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Fri, 15 Dec 2000 09:15:20 +0000	74 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Fri, 15 Dec 2000 08:46:26 +0000	146 lines
Re: "like that for" again	Fri, 15 Dec 2000 02:54:34 -0000	141 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Fri, 15 Dec 2000 02:54:31 -0000	113 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Thu, 14 Dec 2000 11:28:36 +0000	48 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:01:09 +0000	41 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Wed, 13 Dec 2000 22:31:22 +0000	13 lines
Re: What I found out was is ...	Wed, 13 Dec 2000 18:28:54 +0100	25 lines
What I found out was is ...	Wed, 13 Dec 2000 14:36:16 +0000	94 lines
Re: ontology of language (was: RE: "like that for")	Mon, 11 Dec 2000 11:45:29 +0000	84 lines
Re: "like that for" again	Sun, 10 Dec 2000 23:06:36 +0100	102 lines
Re: "like that for" again	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 17:56:15 -0000	117 lines
ontology of language (was: RE: "like that for")	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 17:56:10 -0000	93 lines
Re: "like that for" again	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 17:22:35 +0100	36 lines
Re: "like that for" again	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 02:49:33 -0000	51 lines
Re: "like that for" again	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 23:09:23 +0100	101 lines
Re: "like that for"	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:05:45 +0000	47 lines
Re: "like that for" again	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:59:13 +0000	22 lines
Re: "like that for" again	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:39:27 -0000	68 lines
Re: "like that for" again	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:39:23 -0000	88 lines
Re: "like that for"	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:39:20 -0000	32 lines
Re: "like that for" again	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 11:27:28 +0100	43 lines
Re: "like that for" again	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 09:14:05 +0000	44 lines
Re: "like that for" again	Fri, 8 Dec 2000 10:55:54 +0800	30 lines
Re: "like that for" again	Thu, 7 Dec 2000 12:52:20 +0000	70 lines
Re: "like that for"	Thu, 7 Dec 2000 12:34:24 +0000	44 lines
Re: "like that for" again	Wed, 6 Dec 2000 23:09:01 +0100	70 lines
list problems	Wed, 6 Dec 2000 17:29:14 +0000	28 lines
Carl on "Who did you talk about being clever?"	Wed, 6 Dec 2000 17:06:49 +0000	19 lines
Dick on "who did you talk about being clever"?	Wed, 6 Dec 2000 17:03:16 +0000	46 lines
"like that for" again	Wed, 6 Dec 2000 16:52:42 +0000	25 lines
"like that for"	Wed, 6 Dec 2000 16:45:58 +0000	24 lines
Re: "Who did you talk about being clever?"	Tue, 5 Dec 2000 14:55:23 -0500	27 lines
Re: "Who did you talk about being clever?"	Tue, 5 Dec 2000 20:38:00 +0100	38 lines
Re: "Who did you talk about being clever?"	Tue, 5 Dec 2000 19:25:33 +0000	69 lines
"Who did you talk about being clever?"	Tue, 5 Dec 2000 15:30:21 +0000	44 lines
Re: extraposition judgements sought	Mon, 4 Dec 2000 12:06:24 -0500	78 lines
Re: constructions?	Mon, 4 Dec 2000 13:45:57 +0100	24 lines
Re: constructions?	Mon, 4 Dec 2000 11:52:52 +0000	28 lines
Re: extraposition judgements sought	Mon, 4 Dec 2000 11:48:40 +0000	85 lines
Re: constructions?	Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:33:15 +0000	51 lines
Re: extraposition judgements sought	Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:17:35 +0000	75 lines
Re: extraposition judgements sought	Sat, 2 Dec 2000 16:39:41 +0100	109 lines
Re: constructions?	Sat, 2 Dec 2000 12:49:22 +0100	104 lines
Re: constructions?	Sat, 2 Dec 2000 12:37:34 +0100	43 lines
Re: constructions?	Sat, 2 Dec 2000 10:47:26 -0000	77 lines
Re: extraposition judgements sought	Sat, 2 Dec 2000 04:42:26 +0100	66 lines
Re: constructions?	Sat, 2 Dec 2000 04:41:07 +0100	75 lines
extraposition judgements sought	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 23:35:11 -0000	59 lines
Re: Congratulations, And!	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 23:27:20 -0000	34 lines
Re: constructions?	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 20:11:08 +0100	40 lines
Re: constructions?	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 20:11:03 +0100	28 lines
even cleverer than that!	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 12:36:53 +0000	22 lines
Re: constructions?	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 12:29:06 +0000	93 lines
Re: constructions?	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 11:12:10 +0000	63 lines
Re: constructions?	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 10:58:20 +0000	33 lines
constructions?	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 09:40:34 -0000	22 lines
Congratulations, And!	Thu, 30 Nov 2000 21:48:44 +0100	20 lines
Real WG fun	Mon, 20 Nov 2000 22:15:23 +0000	26 lines
more fun	Mon, 20 Nov 2000 20:39:08 +0000	89 lines
[Fwd: Please DDOONN''TT try out web query!]	Fri, 17 Nov 2000 09:14:34 +0000	41 lines
Re: Here you are	Wed, 15 Nov 2000 18:20:43 +0000	84 lines
Re: Here you are	Wed, 15 Nov 2000 15:58:18 +0000	75 lines
to while away all those spare minutes:	Mon, 13 Nov 2000 10:35:25 +0000	34 lines
Fun for Word Grammarians	Sat, 11 Nov 2000 18:09:52 +0000	72 lines
anyone want to be a teacher?	Wed, 08 Nov 2000 17:57:29 +0000	70 lines
RE: "but not for 20 minutes"	Fri, 3 Nov 2000 16:53:03 -0000	35 lines
Re: "but not for 20 minutes"	Wed, 01 Nov 2000 18:26:46 +0000	147 lines
Re: "but not for 20 minutes"	Wed, 01 Nov 2000 18:04:21 +0000	59 lines
Re: "but not for 20 minutes"	Wed, 01 Nov 2000 16:53:50 +0000	117 lines
Re: "but not for 20 minutes"	Wed, 01 Nov 2000 15:59:44 +0000	40 lines
Re: "but not for 20 minutes"	Wed, 01 Nov 2000 08:25:33 +0000	34 lines
Re: "but not for 20 minutes"	Tue, 31 Oct 2000 20:30:17 +0000	76 lines
Re: "but not for 20 minutes"	Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:04:41 +0000	56 lines
"but not for 20 minutes"	Tue, 31 Oct 2000 08:27:50 -0000	34 lines
RE: representation of adjuncts	Mon, 30 Oct 2000 15:10:50 -0500 (EST)	30 lines
RE: representation of adjuncts	Mon, 30 Oct 2000 16:08:58 -0000	81 lines
Re: representation of adjuncts	Sun, 29 Oct 2000 06:45:54 -0500 (EST)	29 lines
RE: Above-the-line-ness	Sun, 29 Oct 2000 01:24:39 -0000	93 lines
RE: tests for tense	Sun, 29 Oct 2000 01:24:32 -0000	40 lines
RE: Above-the-line-ness	Sat, 28 Oct 2000 10:33:19 +0100	126 lines
Re: tests for tense	Fri, 27 Oct 2000 21:52:33 +0100	31 lines
Re: tests for tense	Fri, 27 Oct 2000 22:35:21 +0200	55 lines
Re: tests for tense	Fri, 27 Oct 2000 15:00:36 -0400 (EDT)	47 lines
Re: tests for tense	Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:03:06 -0400	54 lines
Re: tests for tense	Fri, 27 Oct 2000 18:02:03 +0100	43 lines
Re: tests for tense	Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:48:34 -0400 (EDT)	27 lines
Re: tests for tense	Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:50:16 +0100	37 lines
Re: more thoughts on complement subjunctives	Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:44:20 +0100	25 lines
Re: Above-the-line-ness	Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:40:48 +0100	77 lines
Re: Above-the-line-ness	Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:37:48 +0800	70 lines
more thoughts on complement subjunctives	Thu, 26 Oct 2000 21:44:02 +0100	94 lines
representation of adjuncts	Thu, 26 Oct 2000 21:43:59 +0100	93 lines
tests for tense	Thu, 26 Oct 2000 21:43:56 +0100	23 lines
Above-the-line-ness	Thu, 26 Oct 2000 21:43:31 +0100	55 lines
RE: subjunctive	Wed, 25 Oct 2000 17:56:02 +0100	32 lines
RE: subjunctive	Wed, 25 Oct 2000 16:23:29 +0100	84 lines
RE: sweeping with	Wed, 25 Oct 2000 16:23:26 +0100	41 lines
Re: sweeping with	Wed, 25 Oct 2000 09:05:24 +0200	62 lines
RE: subjunctive	Tue, 24 Oct 2000 19:09:03 +0100	75 lines
RE: Iteratable complements?	Tue, 24 Oct 2000 14:34:10 +0100	51 lines
RE: Iteratable complements?	Tue, 24 Oct 2000 14:34:10 +0100	51 lines
RE: sweeping with	Tue, 24 Oct 2000 14:34:08 +0100	61 lines
Re: Iteratable complements?	Tue, 24 Oct 2000 08:38:21 +0200	36 lines
Re: Iteratable complements?	Mon, 23 Oct 2000 21:06:23 +0100	46 lines
RE: subjunctive	Mon, 23 Oct 2000 19:43:35 +0100	98 lines
Iteratable complements?	Mon, 23 Oct 2000 13:45:26 +0200	26 lines
Re: sweeping with	Mon, 23 Oct 2000 13:34:18 +0200	39 lines
RE: sweeping with	Sat, 21 Oct 2000 21:57:33 +0100	46 lines
Ungodly Global Warming, Genocide, World Hunger, and Hope	Sat, 21 Oct 2000 16:32:50 -0400	297 lines
Re: subjunctive	Fri, 20 Oct 2000 18:22:55 +0100	75 lines
Re: sweeping with	Fri, 20 Oct 2000 17:51:51 +0100	39 lines
Here you are	Fri, 20 Oct 2000 16:28:04 +0200	74 lines
Does sweeping require a broom?	Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:51:00 +0100	26 lines
RE: sweeping with	Thu, 19 Oct 2000 18:36:19 +0100	25 lines
RE: sweeping with	Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:24:51 +0200	57 lines
Re: sweeping with	Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:23:08 +0200	39 lines
SLI bibliography	Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:52:59 +0200	60 lines
RE: Judgement, please	Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:01:14 +0200	61 lines
sweeping with	Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:01:12 +0200	32 lines
Re: Judgement, please	Wed, 18 Oct 2000 22:48:15 -0400	124 lines
(no subject)	Wed, 18 Oct 2000 14:48:56 EDT	21 lines
RE: Judgement, please	Wed, 18 Oct 2000 18:06:09 +0100	33 lines
subjunctive	Wed, 18 Oct 2000 18:02:00 +0100	34 lines
Re: Judgement, please	Thu, 19 Oct 2000 01:48:19 +0900	76 lines
RE: Judgement, please	Wed, 18 Oct 2000 17:11:00 +0100	31 lines
RE: Judgement, please	Wed, 18 Oct 2000 17:03:56 +0100	29 lines
RE: Judgement, please	Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:32:03 +0200	32 lines
RE: Judgement, please	Wed, 18 Oct 2000 12:01:00 +0100	19 lines
Re: Judgement, please	Wed, 18 Oct 2000 11:53:00 +0100	52 lines
RE: Judgement, please	Wed, 18 Oct 2000 11:50:00 +0100	76 lines
Re: Judgement, please	Wed, 18 Oct 2000 06:32:19 -0400 (EDT)	77 lines
RE: Judgement, please	Wed, 18 Oct 2000 12:13:40 +0200	109 lines
Re: Judgement, please	Wed, 18 Oct 2000 02:43:17 +0100	64 lines
Re: Judgement, please	Tue, 17 Oct 2000 19:40:32 -0400	77 lines
Re: Judgement, please	Tue, 17 Oct 2000 22:40:29 +0200	74 lines
Re: Judgement, please	Wed, 18 Oct 2000 04:45:52 +0900	90 lines
Re: Judgement, please	Tue, 17 Oct 2000 19:19:35 +0100	53 lines
Judgement, please	Wed, 18 Oct 2000 01:44:57 +0900	56 lines
RE: 2 remarks on WG formalism	Sun, 8 Oct 2000 12:09:25 +0100	78 lines
RE: 2 remarks on WG formalism	Fri, 06 Oct 2000 08:53:45 +0100	50 lines
RE: 2 remarks on WG formalism	Thu, 5 Oct 2000 22:41:46 +0100	40 lines
Re: 2 remarks on WG formalism	Thu, 05 Oct 2000 16:43:41 +0100	32 lines
Re: 2 remarks on WG formalism	Thu, 5 Oct 2000 14:21:00 +0100	50 lines
Re: 2 remarks on WG formalism	Wed, 04 Oct 2000 22:08:16 +0100	65 lines
Re: 2 remarks on WG formalism	Wed, 4 Oct 2000 17:37:00 +0100	86 lines
Re: 2 remarks on WG formalism	Tue, 03 Oct 2000 18:06:23 +0100	58 lines
Re: 2 remarks on WG formalism	Tue, 3 Oct 2000 13:08:00 +0100	99 lines
Re: 2 remarks on WG formalism	Mon, 02 Oct 2000 19:49:56 +0100	78 lines
Re: 2 remarks on WG formalism	Mon, 2 Oct 2000 17:11:00 +0100	88 lines
Re: 2 remarks on WG formalism	Mon, 02 Oct 2000 09:53:30 +0100	88 lines
Re: adjuncts again	Fri, 29 Sep 2000 17:31:19 +0100	47 lines
Re: Prepositional specifiers	Mon, 25 Sep 2000 08:49:45 +0200	23 lines
RE: Prepositional specifiers	Sat, 23 Sep 2000 12:43:00 +0100	64 lines
Re: Prepositional specifiers	Thu, 21 Sep 2000 23:40:44 +0100	91 lines
Prepositional specifiers	Thu, 21 Sep 2000 17:44:41 +0200	47 lines
Re: word classes/parts of speech	Mon, 18 Sep 2000 16:22:17 +0800	142 lines
word classes/parts of speech	Sat, 16 Sep 2000 14:46:11 +0100	69 lines
Re: complementation of WANT	Tue, 12 Sep 2000 17:37:00 +0100	218 lines
Re: complementation of WANT	Tue, 12 Sep 2000 15:31:43 +0100	344 lines
complementation of WANT	Mon, 11 Sep 2000 15:23:00 +0100	42 lines
RE: adjuncts again	Mon, 11 Sep 2000 14:04:00 +0100	61 lines
RE: adjuncts again	Mon, 11 Sep 2000 09:48:59 +0100	283 lines
RE: adjuncts again	Mon, 11 Sep 2000 01:05:13 +0100	247 lines
RE: adjuncts again	Mon, 11 Sep 2000 00:42:32 +0100	38 lines
RE: adjuncts again	Sun, 10 Sep 2000 07:32:40 -0400 (EDT)	57 lines
RE: adjuncts again	Sun, 10 Sep 2000 07:21:18 -0400 (EDT)	193 lines
RE: adjuncts again	Sat, 9 Sep 2000 13:05:28 +0100	289 lines
Re: adjuncts again	Sat, 09 Sep 2000 00:01:33 +0200	62 lines
2 remarks on WG formalism	Fri, 8 Sep 2000 21:39:47 +0100	76 lines
adjuncts again	Fri, 8 Sep 2000 14:54:53 -0400 (EDT)	189 lines
Re: inflections	Wed, 6 Sep 2000 13:43:00 +0100	86 lines
FW: inflections	Wed, 6 Sep 2000 13:32:00 +0100	73 lines
RE: sets and collectivities	Tue, 5 Sep 2000 16:42:00 +0100	36 lines
RE: sets and collectivities	Mon, 04 Sep 2000 09:54:14 +0100	34 lines
Re: inflections	Mon, 04 Sep 2000 10:05:19 +0200	103 lines
RE: sets and collectivities	Fri, 1 Sep 2000 16:11:49 +0100	37 lines
Re: Quantifiers	Fri, 01 Sep 2000 08:46:33 +0100	62 lines
Re: Quantifiers	Fri, 01 Sep 2000 15:06:49 +0800	47 lines
sets and collectivities	Fri, 01 Sep 2000 07:56:21 +0100	32 lines
RE: inflections	Fri, 1 Sep 2000 02:59:41 +0100	66 lines
RE: inflections	Fri, 1 Sep 2000 02:59:39 +0100	38 lines
RE: inflections	Fri, 1 Sep 2000 02:59:36 +0100	37 lines
RE: inflections	Fri, 1 Sep 2000 02:59:36 +0100	37 lines
RE: inflections	Fri, 1 Sep 2000 02:59:20 +0100	49 lines
RE: inflections	Fri, 1 Sep 2000 02:59:20 +0100	49 lines
RE: inflections	Fri, 1 Sep 2000 02:59:20 +0100	49 lines
RE: inflections	Fri, 1 Sep 2000 01:35:22 +0100	99 lines
Quantifiers: PS	Thu, 31 Aug 2000 19:34:56 +0100	22 lines
Quantifiers	Thu, 31 Aug 2000 16:12:17 +0100	31 lines
Re: inflections	Thu, 31 Aug 2000 09:47:00 +0100	51 lines
Re: inflections	Thu, 31 Aug 2000 09:57:07 +0200	44 lines
Re: inflections	Wed, 30 Aug 2000 23:10:42 +0200	45 lines
RE: inflections	Wed, 30 Aug 2000 09:05:10 +0100	32 lines
Re: inflections	Wed, 30 Aug 2000 08:54:21 +0100	48 lines
RE: inflections	Wed, 30 Aug 2000 11:40:52 +0800	39 lines
Re: inflections	Tue, 29 Aug 2000 21:55:56 +0200	72 lines
RE: inflections	Tue, 29 Aug 2000 15:43:43 +0100	29 lines
RE: inflections	Tue, 29 Aug 2000 13:43:03 +0100	83 lines
RE: inflections	Tue, 29 Aug 2000 13:43:01 +0100	42 lines
Re: inflections	Tue, 29 Aug 2000 10:00:24 +0100	59 lines
RE: inflections	Tue, 29 Aug 2000 09:20:43 +0100	79 lines
Re: inflections	Sun, 27 Aug 2000 19:00:08 +0200	33 lines
Re: inflections	Sun, 27 Aug 2000 17:57:13 +0200	141 lines
RE: inflections	Sun, 27 Aug 2000 01:58:49 +0100	75 lines
RE: inflections	Sun, 27 Aug 2000 01:58:46 +0100	97 lines
RE: inflections	Sun, 27 Aug 2000 01:58:44 +0100	80 lines
RE: inflections	Sat, 26 Aug 2000 02:29:57 +0100	63 lines
RE: inflections	Sat, 26 Aug 2000 02:29:55 +0100	86 lines
Re: inflections	Fri, 25 Aug 2000 22:14:49 +0200	68 lines
Re: inflections	Fri, 25 Aug 2000 15:03:59 +0100	50 lines
RE: inflections	Fri, 25 Aug 2000 14:54:01 +0200	87 lines
RE: inflections	Fri, 25 Aug 2000 14:21:45 +0200	63 lines
Re: inflections	Fri, 25 Aug 2000 14:16:49 +0200	42 lines
RE: inflections	Thu, 24 Aug 2000 16:49:51 +0100	62 lines
RE: inflections	Thu, 24 Aug 2000 16:29:25 +0100	49 lines
RE: inflections	Thu, 24 Aug 2000 14:23:00 +0100	56 lines
RE: inflections	Thu, 24 Aug 2000 13:08:22 +0100	84 lines
RE: inflections	Thu, 24 Aug 2000 13:08:19 +0100	63 lines
Re: inflections	Thu, 24 Aug 2000 09:54:03 +0100	131 lines
Re: inflections	Wed, 23 Aug 2000 18:23:38 +0200	183 lines
Re: inflections	Wed, 23 Aug 2000 08:41:21 +0100	112 lines
Re: Changing registered email address	Mon, 21 Aug 2000 08:36:09 +0200	47 lines
Changing registered email address	Fri, 18 Aug 2000 18:19:10 +0100	21 lines
inflections	Thu, 17 Aug 2000 12:32:14 +0200	63 lines
Online materials for English students	Wed, 9 Aug 2000 13:21:20 +0200 (CEST)	39 lines
RE: adjuncts	Fri, 28 Jul 2000 20:49:02 +0100	143 lines
RE: subjects and objects	Fri, 28 Jul 2000 20:48:58 +0100	64 lines
Re: adjuncts	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 17:19:56 +0200	110 lines
RE: subjects and objects	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 09:58:50 +0100	53 lines
RE: adjuncts	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 02:22:11 +0100	48 lines
RE: subjects and objects	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 02:22:03 +0100	96 lines
RE: adjuncts	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 02:21:58 +0100	195 lines
RE: adjuncts	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 02:21:52 +0100	275 lines
RE: adjuncts	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 02:21:49 +0100	83 lines
RE: subjects and objects	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 02:21:47 +0100	33 lines
RE: subjects and objects	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 02:21:47 +0100	33 lines
RE: subjects and objects	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 02:21:44 +0100	57 lines
Re: adjuncts	Tue, 25 Jul 2000 22:40:07 +0200	37 lines
RE: subjects and objects	Mon, 24 Jul 2000 09:14:39 +0200	88 lines
RE: adjuncts	Mon, 24 Jul 2000 14:44:59 +0800	192 lines
RE: adjuncts	Mon, 24 Jul 2000 14:09:18 +0800	249 lines
RE: adjuncts	Mon, 24 Jul 2000 13:42:02 +0800	58 lines
RE: subjects and objects	Mon, 24 Jul 2000 13:35:36 +0800	55 lines
RE: adjuncts	Sun, 23 Jul 2000 09:36:54 +0100	149 lines
RE: subjects and objects	Sun, 23 Jul 2000 00:45:21 +0100	133 lines
RE: adjuncts	Sat, 22 Jul 2000 15:47:51 +0100	36 lines
RE: adjuncts	Sat, 22 Jul 2000 15:47:47 +0100	64 lines
RE: adjuncts	Sat, 22 Jul 2000 15:47:40 +0100	181 lines
RE: subjects and objects	Sat, 22 Jul 2000 15:47:36 +0100	75 lines
RE: subjects and objects	Sat, 22 Jul 2000 10:23:50 +0100	56 lines
RE: subjects and objects	Sat, 22 Jul 2000 10:23:47 +0100	40 lines
RE: subjects and objects	Sat, 22 Jul 2000 10:23:43 +0100	120 lines
Re: adjuncts	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 14:55:14 +0800	97 lines
Re: adjuncts	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 12:40:27 +0200	55 lines
adjuncts	Wed, 19 Jul 2000 10:09:50 +0100	106 lines
Re: subjects and objects	Tue, 18 Jul 2000 21:49:24 +0200	52 lines
Re: subjects and objects	Tue, 18 Jul 2000 13:57:00 +0100	40 lines
Re: subjects and objects	Tue, 18 Jul 2000 12:48:57 +0200	87 lines
Re: subjects and objects	Tue, 18 Jul 2000 10:44:10 +0800	54 lines
RE: subjects and objects	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 17:52:59 +0100	33 lines
Re: subjects and objects	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 14:33:12 +0200	36 lines
RE: subjects and objects	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 11:38:22 +0200	53 lines
Re: subjects and objects	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:37:46 +0200	62 lines
RE: subjects and objects	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:25:32 +0200	176 lines
RE: subjects and objects	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 22:49:04 +0100	45 lines
RE: subjects and objects	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 13:14:38 +0100	36 lines
Re: subjects and objects	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 23:12:27 +0200	25 lines
Re: subjects and objects	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 14:00:00 +0100	42 lines
RE: subjects and objects	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 13:31:00 +0100	135 lines
Re: subjects and objects	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 10:10:11 +0200	73 lines
Re: subjects and objects	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:45:14 +0100	67 lines
subjects and objects	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:49:49 +0200	87 lines
LAGB	Tue, 11 Jul 2000 16:35:17 +0100	428 lines
Re: attributive adjectives	Tue, 11 Jul 2000 13:35:00 +0100	70 lines
Re: attributive adjectives	Tue, 11 Jul 2000 07:48:07 +0100	46 lines
attributive adjectives	Mon, 10 Jul 2000 21:37:45 +0100	51 lines
WG course material	Wed, 21 Jun 2000 08:24:09 +0100	24 lines
RE: adjacency in WG	Tue, 20 Jun 2000 13:02:22 +0100	45 lines
RE: adjacency in WG	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 21:57:02 +0100	55 lines
RE: adjacency in WG	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 14:00:03 +0100	216 lines
RE: adjacency in WG	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 09:10:19 +0100	167 lines
RE: adjacency in WG	Sat, 17 Jun 2000 15:21:20 +0100	138 lines
RE: adjacency in WG	Sat, 17 Jun 2000 14:18:27 +0100	116 lines
Re: adjacency in WG	Fri, 16 Jun 2000 16:19:54 +0100	50 lines
Re: adjacency in WG	Fri, 16 Jun 2000 07:14:14 -0400 (EDT)	35 lines
adjacency in WG	Fri, 16 Jun 2000 08:23:21 +0100	46 lines
Re: WG bibliography	Thu, 15 Jun 2000 17:17:48 +0200	73 lines
Re: WG bibliography	Thu, 15 Jun 2000 23:47:58 +0900	58 lines
Re: WG bibliography	Thu, 15 Jun 2000 15:31:38 +0100	30 lines
Re: WG bibliography	Thu, 15 Jun 2000 13:21:00 +0100	22 lines
Re: WG bibliography	Wed, 14 Jun 2000 20:20:16 +0100	62 lines
Sorry	Thu, 15 Jun 2000 01:20:11 +0900	33 lines
Re: WG bibliography	Thu, 15 Jun 2000 01:06:13 +0900	404 lines
WG bibliography	Mon, 12 Jun 2000 16:15:27 +0100	28 lines
Re: intonation	Thu, 01 Jun 2000 10:09:38 +0200	39 lines
Re: intonation	Wed, 31 May 2000 18:06:00 +0100	127 lines
Re: No longer just eggheads, linguists leap to the Net (fwd)	Wed, 31 May 2000 18:59:02 +0200	36 lines
Re: intonation	Wed, 31 May 2000 10:29:02 +0200	111 lines
No longer just eggheads, linguists leap to the Net (fwd)	Wed, 31 May 2000 13:43:06 +0800	27 lines
RE: intonation	Tue, 30 May 2000 16:47:07 +0100	168 lines
Re: intonation	Mon, 29 May 2000 08:15:01 +0200	33 lines
Re: intonation	Mon, 29 May 2000 12:35:58 +0800	28 lines
Re: intonation	Sun, 28 May 2000 23:26:50 +0200	110 lines
RE: Need	Tue, 16 May 2000 08:39:01 +0100	33 lines
Re: Need	Mon, 15 May 2000 23:44:20 -0400	34 lines
RE: intonation	Mon, 15 May 2000 19:06:47 +0100	70 lines
RE: Need	Mon, 15 May 2000 19:06:42 +0100	159 lines
Re: "why"-phase in lg acq	Mon, 15 May 2000 17:43:13 +0200	38 lines
RE: Need (it's a Pittsburgh specialty)	Mon, 15 May 2000 12:54:23 +0100	35 lines
Re: intonation	Mon, 15 May 2000 12:29:45 +0100	50 lines
RE: Need (it's a Pittsburgh specialty)	Mon, 15 May 2000 12:26:07 +0100	31 lines
Re: Need	Mon, 15 May 2000 11:41:08 +0100	37 lines
RE: Need	Mon, 15 May 2000 08:42:52 +0100	77 lines
RE: Need	Sat, 13 May 2000 12:26:51 +0100	128 lines
RE: Need (it's a Pittsburgh specialty)	Sat, 13 May 2000 12:26:48 +0100	32 lines
intonation	Sat, 13 May 2000 12:26:44 +0100	42 lines
"why"-phase in lg acq	Sat, 13 May 2000 12:26:41 +0100	17 lines
Re: Need (it's a Pittsburgh specialty)	Fri, 12 May 2000 23:18:19 -0400	49 lines
Re: Need	Sat, 13 May 2000 00:24:09 +0200	101 lines
Re: Need (it's a Pittsburgh specialty)	Sat, 13 May 2000 00:08:42 +0200	84 lines
Please reply	Fri, 12 May 2000 13:31:13 GMT	86 lines
Re: Need (it's a Pittsburgh specialty)	Fri, 12 May 2000 09:42:15 +0100	29 lines
Re: Need	Fri, 12 May 2000 09:36:16 +0100	88 lines
Re: Need (it's a Pittsburgh specialty)	Thu, 11 May 2000 19:32:38 -0400	120 lines
Need	Thu, 11 May 2000 19:31:27 +0200	47 lines
Re: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians	Fri, 28 Apr 2000 06:26:59 -0400 (EDT)	100 lines
RE: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians	Fri, 28 Apr 2000 08:47:50 +0100	37 lines
RE: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians	Thu, 27 Apr 2000 21:03:21 +0100	53 lines
Re: SUBJ-VERB AGREEMENT	Thu, 27 Apr 2000 11:37:37 +0100	37 lines
Re: 11.944, Books: Available For Review	Wed, 26 Apr 2000 12:48:01 +0100	38 lines
oops!	Wed, 26 Apr 2000 11:30:42 +0200	14 lines
Re: 11.944, Books: Available For Review	Wed, 26 Apr 2000 09:52:49 +0200	341 lines
11.944, Books: Available For Review	Wed, 26 Apr 2000 08:12:13 +0100	310 lines
Re: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians	Wed, 26 Apr 2000 08:54:19 +0200	39 lines
Re: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians	Tue, 25 Apr 2000 21:28:36 +0100	122 lines
Re: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians	Mon, 10 Apr 2000 17:27:00 +0100	52 lines
RE: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians	Mon, 10 Apr 2000 17:24:00 +0100	38 lines
unsubscribe word grammar	10 Apr 00 15:45:43 BST	16 lines
Re: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians	Mon, 10 Apr 2000 22:16:59 +0800	48 lines
Re: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians	Mon, 10 Apr 2000 05:15:04 -0700 (PDT)	120 lines
Re: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians	Mon, 10 Apr 2000 08:39:07 +0200	42 lines
RE: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians	Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:06:36 +0800	27 lines
Re: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians	Sun, 09 Apr 2000 11:57:31 +0200	43 lines
Re: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians	Sun, 09 Apr 2000 11:49:49 +0200	45 lines
RE: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians	Sat, 8 Apr 2000 17:15:51 -0400 (EDT)	74 lines
RE: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians	Sat, 8 Apr 2000 21:52:42 +0100	98 lines
Re: SUBJ-VERB AGREEMENT	Fri, 07 Apr 2000 16:57:17 -0400	29 lines
SUBJ-VERB AGREEMENT	Fri, 7 Apr 2000 21:00:56 +0100	30 lines
FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians	Fri, 7 Apr 2000 09:19:26 -0400 (EDT)	57 lines
Re: 2 Qs on passives	Mon, 03 Apr 2000 17:31:10 +0200	65 lines
Re: 2 Qs on passives	Mon, 03 Apr 2000 10:42:52 +0100	62 lines
Re: 2 Qs on passives	Mon, 3 Apr 2000 08:53:09 +0200	30 lines
Re: 2 Qs on passives	Sun, 02 Apr 2000 12:13:04 +0200	86 lines
what's your address, joe?	Fri, 31 Mar 2000 08:36:43 +0200	23 lines
Re: 2 Qs on passives	Wed, 29 Mar 2000 22:39:40 +0100	51 lines
2 Qs on passives	Wed, 29 Mar 2000 18:03:00 +0100	22 lines
Re: Lx in 2020	Tue, 28 Mar 2000 08:51:35 +0100	46 lines
	Mon, 27 Mar 2000 14:57:46 MET	13 lines
Re: Objects and that-clauses	Mon, 27 Mar 2000 14:38:24 +0200	112 lines
Re: Lx in 2020	Mon, 27 Mar 2000 14:14:02 +0200	31 lines
RE: Objects and that-clauses	Sat, 25 Mar 2000 21:51:45 -0000	147 lines
RE: Objects and that-clauses	Sat, 25 Mar 2000 13:22:11 -0000	48 lines
RE: Objects and that-clauses	Sat, 25 Mar 2000 13:22:08 -0000	78 lines
Re: Objects and that-clauses	Fri, 24 Mar 2000 09:40:08 -0800	56 lines
Re: Objects and that-clauses	Fri, 24 Mar 2000 13:09:32 +0100	59 lines
Re: Objects and that-clauses	Fri, 24 Mar 2000 09:29:35 +0100	134 lines
RE: Objects and that-clauses	Thu, 23 Mar 2000 22:24:57 -0000	120 lines
RE: Objects and that-clauses	Thu, 23 Mar 2000 22:11:26 -0000	46 lines
Re: Objects and that-clauses	Thu, 23 Mar 2000 09:58:11 +0100	88 lines
Re: Objects and that-clauses	Wed, 22 Mar 2000 18:18:54 +0000	35 lines
Re: Objects and that-clauses	Wed, 22 Mar 2000 14:06:00 -0000	58 lines
Re: Objects and that-clauses	Wed, 22 Mar 2000 13:58:00 -0000	68 lines
Re: Objects and that-clauses	Wed, 22 Mar 2000 14:36:55 +0100	40 lines
Re: Objects and that-clauses	Wed, 22 Mar 2000 08:08:39 -0500 (EST)	34 lines
Objects and that-clauses	Wed, 22 Mar 2000 13:51:24 +0100	27 lines
RE: Lx in 20 years time	Tue, 21 Mar 2000 14:59:00 -0000	34 lines
Lx in 2020	Tue, 21 Mar 2000 09:08:35 +0000	37 lines
The LAD goes to school	Mon, 20 Mar 2000 21:40:15 +0000	27 lines
The LAD goes to school	Mon, 20 Mar 2000 19:53:14 +0000	20 lines
Re: Lx in 20 years time	Sun, 19 Mar 2000 21:10:16 -0500 (EST)	46 lines
Lx in 20 years time	Sun, 19 Mar 2000 10:01:22 +0100	29 lines
Re: LAD reference	Fri, 17 Mar 2000 14:05:45 +0100	29 lines
LAD reference	Fri, 17 Mar 2000 13:04:54 +0100	23 lines
[Fwd: A Farewell to Nim Chimpsky]	Wed, 15 Mar 2000 18:34:34 +0100	73 lines
RE: 'GRs'	Sat, 11 Mar 2000 04:53:09 -0000	197 lines
RE: 'GRs'	Sat, 11 Mar 2000 04:53:07 -0000	92 lines
RE: 'GRs'	Sat, 11 Mar 2000 04:53:04 -0000	61 lines
RE: 'GRs'	Sat, 11 Mar 2000 04:53:01 -0000	58 lines
RE: 'GRs'	Sat, 11 Mar 2000 02:26:03 -0000	210 lines
RE: 'GRs'	Sat, 11 Mar 2000 02:25:59 -0000	174 lines
RE: 'GRs'	Sat, 11 Mar 2000 02:25:57 -0000	42 lines
Re: 'GRs'	Fri, 10 Mar 2000 09:18:25 +0000	137 lines
Re: 'GRs'	Fri, 10 Mar 2000 08:28:25 +0100	57 lines
Re: 'GRs'	Fri, 10 Mar 2000 11:18:27 +0800	124 lines
Re: 'GRs'	Fri, 10 Mar 2000 10:37:26 +0800	36 lines
Re: 'GRs'	Thu, 09 Mar 2000 11:22:28 +0000	26 lines
Re: 'GRs'	Thu, 09 Mar 2000 19:06:35 +0800	49 lines
Re: 'GRs'	Thu, 09 Mar 2000 09:56:39 +0000	66 lines
Re: 'GRs'	Thu, 09 Mar 2000 12:34:28 +0800	30 lines
Re: 'GRs'	Thu, 09 Mar 2000 09:16:49 +0800	63 lines
Re: 'GRs'	Thu, 09 Mar 2000 09:02:23 +0800	48 lines
Re: 'GRs'	Wed, 08 Mar 2000 20:29:21 +0000	33 lines
Re: 'GRs'	Wed, 08 Mar 2000 16:29:41 +0100	28 lines
Re: 'GRs'	Wed, 8 Mar 2000 08:12:09 -0500 (EST)	38 lines
Re: 'GRs'	Wed, 8 Mar 2000 06:31:12 -0500 (EST)	109 lines
Re: 'GRs'	Wed, 08 Mar 2000 14:02:57 +0800	26 lines
Re: 'GRs'	Wed, 08 Mar 2000 11:32:49 +0800	122 lines
Re: 'GRs'	Tue, 07 Mar 2000 20:41:07 +0000	31 lines
'GRs'	Tue, 7 Mar 2000 18:50:00 -0000	51 lines
agreement	Tue, 7 Mar 2000 11:08:20 +0100	18 lines
Re: British agreement	Tue, 07 Mar 2000 09:13:40 +0000	46 lines
Re: British agreement	Mon, 6 Mar 2000 17:52:00 -0000	26 lines
RE: British agreement	Sun, 5 Mar 2000 17:35:39 -0000	100 lines
Re: British agreement	Sun, 05 Mar 2000 01:52:06 +0100	40 lines
Re: British agreement	Sun, 05 Mar 2000 01:46:56 +0100	67 lines
more linguistic humour	Fri, 3 Mar 2000 20:52:19 -0500 (EST)	86 lines
Re: British agreement	Fri, 3 Mar 2000 20:44:06 -0500 (EST)	61 lines
RE: British agreement	Fri, 3 Mar 2000 23:21:52 -0000	55 lines
Re: British agreement	Fri, 03 Mar 2000 21:07:30 +0100	67 lines
Re: British agreement	Fri, 03 Mar 2000 16:34:41 +0000	57 lines
British agreement	Fri, 03 Mar 2000 11:14:37 +0100	42 lines
RE: wg colloquium?	Wed, 02 Feb 2000 23:00:16 +0100	20 lines
RE: er and ee	Wed, 2 Feb 2000 13:50:00 -0000	149 lines
RE: er and ee	Wed, 02 Feb 2000 11:53:37 +0800	35 lines
RE: er and ee	Tue, 01 Feb 2000 19:38:47 +0000	87 lines
RE: er and ee	Tue, 1 Feb 2000 13:57:00 -0000	121 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Tue, 1 Feb 2000 13:24:00 -0000	153 lines
stored regularly inflected forms	Tue, 01 Feb 2000 10:41:43 +0000	37 lines
have/be	Tue, 01 Feb 2000 08:57:50 +0000	48 lines
have/be	Tue, 01 Feb 2000 08:57:50 +0000	48 lines
er and ee	Tue, 01 Feb 2000 08:51:59 +0000	101 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Mon, 31 Jan 2000 19:22:26 +0100	65 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Mon, 31 Jan 2000 19:01:26 +0100	121 lines
RE: wg colloquium?	Sat, 29 Jan 2000 19:03:07 -0000	25 lines
Re: wg colloquium?	Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:12:25 +0000	34 lines
Re: wg colloquium?	Fri, 28 Jan 2000 12:32:11 +0900	48 lines
Re: wg colloquium?	Fri, 28 Jan 2000 09:01:51 +0800	42 lines
Re: wg colloquium?	Thu, 27 Jan 2000 17:02:50 +0100	33 lines
wg colloquium?	Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:03:00 -0000	17 lines
Re: storage of regulars	Tue, 25 Jan 2000 19:09:45 +0100	52 lines
storage of regulars	Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:54:00 -0000	13 lines
Re: the nature of word tokens (was: RE: invisible doohickeys)	Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:33:00 -0000	169 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Thu, 13 Jan 2000 14:49:00 -0000	155 lines
Jasper on er	Thu, 13 Jan 2000 14:23:00 -0000	37 lines
Re: the nature of word tokens (was: RE: invisible doohickeys)	Tue, 11 Jan 2000 08:38:46 +0000	118 lines
Re: the nature of word tokens (was: RE: invisible doohickeys)	Mon, 10 Jan 2000 14:26:33 +0100	54 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Mon, 10 Jan 2000 10:38:19 +0000	85 lines
RE: Jasper on er	Mon, 10 Jan 2000 10:02:17 +0000	33 lines
Re: without a trace	Mon, 10 Jan 2000 08:44:54 +0100	51 lines
RE: Jasper on er	Mon, 10 Jan 2000 15:02:45 +0800	57 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Mon, 10 Jan 2000 08:34:29 +0800	61 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Sun, 9 Jan 2000 21:01:29 -0000	67 lines
RE: without a trace	Sun, 9 Jan 2000 21:01:23 -0000	95 lines
RE: Jasper on er	Sun, 9 Jan 2000 19:21:17 -0000	48 lines
Re: without a trace	Sun, 09 Jan 2000 16:38:31 +0100	80 lines
Re: Jasper on er	Sun, 09 Jan 2000 16:36:35 +0100	43 lines
Re: invisible doohickeys	Sun, 09 Jan 2000 09:53:45 +0100	94 lines
the nature of word tokens (was: RE: invisible doohickeys)	Sat, 8 Jan 2000 19:06:04 -0000	122 lines
RE: Jasper on er	Sat, 8 Jan 2000 08:42:55 -0500 (EST)	86 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Sat, 8 Jan 2000 12:57:09 -0000	85 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Sat, 8 Jan 2000 12:56:55 -0000	84 lines
RE: "He did it god knows why"?	Sat, 8 Jan 2000 12:56:51 -0000	30 lines
RE: "what colour hair"	Fri, 7 Jan 2000 15:45:58 -0000	69 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Fri, 07 Jan 2000 12:33:56 +0000	38 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Fri, 07 Jan 2000 11:50:26 +0000	48 lines
Re: "He did it god knows why"?	Fri, 7 Jan 2000 10:53:11 +0100	50 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Fri, 7 Jan 2000 10:28:07 +0100	70 lines
Re: invisible doohickeys	Fri, 07 Jan 2000 10:25:38 +0100	65 lines
Re: invisible doohickeys	Fri, 07 Jan 2000 09:16:03 +0100	28 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Thu, 6 Jan 2000 22:41:12 -0000	55 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Thu, 6 Jan 2000 22:41:07 -0000	58 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Thu, 6 Jan 2000 22:41:00 -0000	37 lines
Re: "what colour hair"	Thu, 06 Jan 2000 19:57:22 +0000	40 lines
new name for extractee sought	Thu, 6 Jan 2000 16:46:48 -0000	20 lines
"what colour hair"	Thu, 6 Jan 2000 16:46:45 -0000	27 lines
"He did it god knows why"?	Thu, 6 Jan 2000 16:46:42 -0000	17 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Thu, 06 Jan 2000 16:05:06 +0000	65 lines
RE: known & asserted propositions	Thu, 06 Jan 2000 15:52:09 +0000	24 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Thu, 06 Jan 2000 15:49:54 +0000	48 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Thu, 6 Jan 2000 14:53:50 +0100	51 lines
without a trace	Thu, 6 Jan 2000 01:22:54 -0000	65 lines
RE: known & asserted propositions	Wed, 5 Jan 2000 21:35:00 -0000	44 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Wed, 5 Jan 2000 21:34:54 -0000	122 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Wed, 5 Jan 2000 18:31:47 -0000	152 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Wed, 5 Jan 2000 18:31:44 -0000	53 lines
Re: known & asserted propositions	Wed, 05 Jan 2000 16:59:29 +0000	40 lines
Re: invisible doohickeys	Wed, 05 Jan 2000 16:49:26 +0000	73 lines
Re: 'MEISM'	Wed, 5 Jan 2000 16:14:53 +0100	32 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Wed, 5 Jan 2000 14:04:16 -0000	138 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Wed, 5 Jan 2000 14:04:13 -0000	68 lines
'MEISM'	Wed, 5 Jan 2000 14:04:10 -0000	20 lines
known & asserted propositions	Wed, 5 Jan 2000 14:04:07 -0000	20 lines
Re: invisible doohickeys	Wed, 05 Jan 2000 13:50:08 +0100	117 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Wed, 05 Jan 2000 10:28:37 +0000	28 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Tue, 4 Jan 2000 22:39:00 -0000	116 lines
from my data collection (was: RE: invisible doohickeys)	Tue, 4 Jan 2000 22:38:50 -0000	46 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Tue, 04 Jan 2000 14:15:53 +0000	46 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Tue, 04 Jan 2000 14:06:04 +0000	86 lines
Re: invisible doohickeys	Tue, 04 Jan 2000 08:10:25 +0000	29 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Tue, 04 Jan 2000 13:24:20 +0800	50 lines
Re: invisible doohickeys	Mon, 03 Jan 2000 21:35:20 +0100	93 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Mon, 3 Jan 2000 19:12:54 -0000	58 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Mon, 3 Jan 2000 19:12:50 -0000	41 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Mon, 3 Jan 2000 19:12:46 -0000	38 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Mon, 3 Jan 2000 19:12:42 -0000	42 lines
RE: formulating a c-selection rule	Mon, 3 Jan 2000 19:12:38 -0000	40 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Mon, 3 Jan 2000 16:45:44 -0000	136 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Mon, 3 Jan 2000 10:16:57 +0100	49 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Mon, 3 Jan 2000 10:00:25 +0100	28 lines
RE: formulating a c-selection rule	Mon, 3 Jan 2000 09:28:03 +0100	31 lines
Re: invisible doohickeys	Mon, 03 Jan 2000 15:25:21 +0800	37 lines
Re: invisible doohickeys	Sun, 02 Jan 2000 23:03:22 +0100	93 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Sat, 1 Jan 2000 18:18:35 -0000	186 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Sat, 1 Jan 2000 13:27:35 -0000	91 lines
RE: invisible doohickeys	Sat, 1 Jan 2000 13:27:29 -0000	130 lines

WORDGRAMMAR Archives

2000

Options

Subject

Date

Size

JiscMail Tools

RSS Feeds and Sharing

Search Archives

Archives