|
|
|
Size
|
Re: "like that for" again
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Sat, 30 Dec 2000 20:38:51 +0100 |
66 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 30 Dec 2000 01:42:06 -0000 |
143 lines |
Re: "like that for" again
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 30 Dec 2000 01:42:01 -0000 |
158 lines |
Re: "like that for" again
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Fri, 29 Dec 2000 00:36:44 +0100 |
124 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Thu, 28 Dec 2000 22:10:44 +0100 |
116 lines |
Re: "like that for" again
|
And Rosta |
Thu, 28 Dec 2000 16:48:49 -0000 |
151 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
And Rosta |
Tue, 26 Dec 2000 23:56:31 -0000 |
82 lines |
expressive power of WG
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 22 Dec 2000 09:18:02 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 22 Dec 2000 03:39:09 -0000 |
92 lines |
Re: "like that for" again
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 22 Dec 2000 03:39:06 -0000 |
53 lines |
Re: Revised: The Gene out of the Bottle
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Thu, 21 Dec 2000 22:05:31 +0100 |
24 lines |
Re: "like that for" again
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Thu, 21 Dec 2000 21:07:13 +0100 |
113 lines |
Re: Revised: The Gene out of the Bottle
|
Jasper Holmes |
Thu, 21 Dec 2000 14:16:00 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: Revised: The Gene out of the Bottle
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Thu, 21 Dec 2000 14:31:25 +0100 |
916 lines |
Re: Revised: The Gene out of the Bottle
|
Karl Sokalski |
Thu, 21 Dec 2000 06:00:04 -0500 |
44 lines |
Revised: The Gene out of the Bottle
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Thu, 21 Dec 2000 11:22:06 +0100 |
23 lines |
Re: "like that for" again
|
Dick Hudson |
Wed, 20 Dec 2000 14:58:20 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
Jasper Holmes |
Wed, 20 Dec 2000 13:22:42 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
Jasper Holmes |
Wed, 20 Dec 2000 13:14:53 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
Dick Hudson |
Wed, 20 Dec 2000 09:24:49 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: "like that for" again
|
And Rosta |
Tue, 19 Dec 2000 17:03:21 -0000 |
186 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
And Rosta |
Tue, 19 Dec 2000 17:03:17 -0000 |
30 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
And Rosta |
Tue, 19 Dec 2000 17:03:05 -0000 |
55 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Tue, 19 Dec 2000 08:53:29 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
Dick Hudson |
Mon, 18 Dec 2000 20:14:27 +0000 |
58 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Mon, 18 Dec 2000 20:05:56 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
Dick Hudson |
Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:45:42 +0000 |
76 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
Jasper Holmes |
Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:35:51 +0000 |
19 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
And Rosta |
Mon, 18 Dec 2000 15:01:08 -0000 |
51 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Mon, 18 Dec 2000 14:56:21 +0100 |
62 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Mon, 18 Dec 2000 14:40:59 +0100 |
62 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Mon, 18 Dec 2000 14:05:58 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
Jasper Holmes |
Mon, 18 Dec 2000 09:53:35 +0000 |
23 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
Jasper Holmes |
Mon, 18 Dec 2000 09:32:28 +0000 |
70 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
Dick Hudson |
Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:55:15 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Sun, 17 Dec 2000 11:43:19 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 16 Dec 2000 20:31:09 -0000 |
106 lines |
Re: "like that for" again
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Sat, 16 Dec 2000 20:32:52 +0100 |
98 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Sat, 16 Dec 2000 20:30:24 +0100 |
63 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Sat, 16 Dec 2000 20:23:34 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 15 Dec 2000 19:32:13 -0000 |
53 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 15 Dec 2000 09:15:20 +0000 |
74 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
Jasper Holmes |
Fri, 15 Dec 2000 08:46:26 +0000 |
146 lines |
Re: "like that for" again
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 15 Dec 2000 02:54:34 -0000 |
141 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 15 Dec 2000 02:54:31 -0000 |
113 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
Jasper Holmes |
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 11:28:36 +0000 |
48 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
Dick Hudson |
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:01:09 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
Dylan |
Wed, 13 Dec 2000 22:31:22 +0000 |
13 lines |
Re: What I found out was is ...
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Wed, 13 Dec 2000 18:28:54 +0100 |
25 lines |
What I found out was is ...
|
<> |
Wed, 13 Dec 2000 14:36:16 +0000 |
94 lines |
Re: ontology of language (was: RE: "like that for")
|
Jasper Holmes |
Mon, 11 Dec 2000 11:45:29 +0000 |
84 lines |
Re: "like that for" again
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Sun, 10 Dec 2000 23:06:36 +0100 |
102 lines |
Re: "like that for" again
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 9 Dec 2000 17:56:15 -0000 |
117 lines |
ontology of language (was: RE: "like that for")
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 9 Dec 2000 17:56:10 -0000 |
93 lines |
Re: "like that for" again
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Sat, 9 Dec 2000 17:22:35 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: "like that for" again
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 9 Dec 2000 02:49:33 -0000 |
51 lines |
Re: "like that for" again
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Fri, 8 Dec 2000 23:09:23 +0100 |
101 lines |
Re: "like that for"
|
Jasper Holmes |
Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:05:45 +0000 |
47 lines |
Re: "like that for" again
|
Jasper Holmes |
Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:59:13 +0000 |
22 lines |
Re: "like that for" again
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:39:27 -0000 |
68 lines |
Re: "like that for" again
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:39:23 -0000 |
88 lines |
Re: "like that for"
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:39:20 -0000 |
32 lines |
Re: "like that for" again
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Fri, 8 Dec 2000 11:27:28 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: "like that for" again
|
Jasper Holmes |
Fri, 8 Dec 2000 09:14:05 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: "like that for" again
|
Nik Gisborne |
Fri, 8 Dec 2000 10:55:54 +0800 |
30 lines |
Re: "like that for" again
|
Jasper Holmes |
Thu, 7 Dec 2000 12:52:20 +0000 |
70 lines |
Re: "like that for"
|
Jasper Holmes |
Thu, 7 Dec 2000 12:34:24 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: "like that for" again
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Wed, 6 Dec 2000 23:09:01 +0100 |
70 lines |
list problems
|
And Rosta |
Wed, 6 Dec 2000 17:29:14 +0000 |
28 lines |
Carl on "Who did you talk about being clever?"
|
And Rosta |
Wed, 6 Dec 2000 17:06:49 +0000 |
19 lines |
Dick on "who did you talk about being clever"?
|
And Rosta |
Wed, 6 Dec 2000 17:03:16 +0000 |
46 lines |
"like that for" again
|
And Rosta |
Wed, 6 Dec 2000 16:52:42 +0000 |
25 lines |
"like that for"
|
And Rosta |
Wed, 6 Dec 2000 16:45:58 +0000 |
24 lines |
Re: "Who did you talk about being clever?"
|
Carl Burke |
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 14:55:23 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: "Who did you talk about being clever?"
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 20:38:00 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: "Who did you talk about being clever?"
|
Dick Hudson |
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 19:25:33 +0000 |
69 lines |
"Who did you talk about being clever?"
|
And Rosta |
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 15:30:21 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: extraposition judgements sought
|
Carl Burke |
Mon, 4 Dec 2000 12:06:24 -0500 |
78 lines |
Re: constructions?
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Mon, 4 Dec 2000 13:45:57 +0100 |
24 lines |
Re: constructions?
|
Jasper Holmes |
Mon, 4 Dec 2000 11:52:52 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: extraposition judgements sought
|
Jasper Holmes |
Mon, 4 Dec 2000 11:48:40 +0000 |
85 lines |
Re: constructions?
|
Dick Hudson |
Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:33:15 +0000 |
51 lines |
Re: extraposition judgements sought
|
Dick Hudson |
Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:17:35 +0000 |
75 lines |
Re: extraposition judgements sought
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Sat, 2 Dec 2000 16:39:41 +0100 |
109 lines |
Re: constructions?
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Sat, 2 Dec 2000 12:49:22 +0100 |
104 lines |
Re: constructions?
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Sat, 2 Dec 2000 12:37:34 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: constructions?
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 2 Dec 2000 10:47:26 -0000 |
77 lines |
Re: extraposition judgements sought
|
herve.wenger |
Sat, 2 Dec 2000 04:42:26 +0100 |
66 lines |
Re: constructions?
|
herve.wenger |
Sat, 2 Dec 2000 04:41:07 +0100 |
75 lines |
extraposition judgements sought
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 1 Dec 2000 23:35:11 -0000 |
59 lines |
Re: Congratulations, And!
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 1 Dec 2000 23:27:20 -0000 |
34 lines |
Re: constructions?
|
herve.wenger |
Fri, 1 Dec 2000 20:11:08 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: constructions?
|
herve.wenger |
Fri, 1 Dec 2000 20:11:03 +0100 |
28 lines |
even cleverer than that!
|
Jasper Holmes |
Fri, 1 Dec 2000 12:36:53 +0000 |
22 lines |
Re: constructions?
|
Jasper Holmes |
Fri, 1 Dec 2000 12:29:06 +0000 |
93 lines |
Re: constructions?
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 1 Dec 2000 11:12:10 +0000 |
63 lines |
Re: constructions?
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 1 Dec 2000 10:58:20 +0000 |
33 lines |
constructions?
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 1 Dec 2000 09:40:34 -0000 |
22 lines |
Congratulations, And!
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Thu, 30 Nov 2000 21:48:44 +0100 |
20 lines |
Real WG fun
|
Dick Hudson |
Mon, 20 Nov 2000 22:15:23 +0000 |
26 lines |
more fun
|
Dick Hudson |
Mon, 20 Nov 2000 20:39:08 +0000 |
89 lines |
[Fwd: Please DDOONN''TT try out web query!]
|
Jasper Holmes |
Fri, 17 Nov 2000 09:14:34 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: Here you are
|
Jasper Holmes |
Wed, 15 Nov 2000 18:20:43 +0000 |
84 lines |
Re: Here you are
|
And Rosta |
Wed, 15 Nov 2000 15:58:18 +0000 |
75 lines |
to while away all those spare minutes:
|
Jasper Holmes |
Mon, 13 Nov 2000 10:35:25 +0000 |
34 lines |
Fun for Word Grammarians
|
Dick Hudson |
Sat, 11 Nov 2000 18:09:52 +0000 |
72 lines |
anyone want to be a teacher?
|
Dick Hudson |
Wed, 08 Nov 2000 17:57:29 +0000 |
70 lines |
RE: "but not for 20 minutes"
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 3 Nov 2000 16:53:03 -0000 |
35 lines |
Re: "but not for 20 minutes"
|
Dylan |
Wed, 01 Nov 2000 18:26:46 +0000 |
147 lines |
Re: "but not for 20 minutes"
|
Dylan |
Wed, 01 Nov 2000 18:04:21 +0000 |
59 lines |
Re: "but not for 20 minutes"
|
Andrew Rosta |
Wed, 01 Nov 2000 16:53:50 +0000 |
117 lines |
Re: "but not for 20 minutes"
|
Andrew Rosta |
Wed, 01 Nov 2000 15:59:44 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: "but not for 20 minutes"
|
Dick Hudson |
Wed, 01 Nov 2000 08:25:33 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: "but not for 20 minutes"
|
Dylan |
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 20:30:17 +0000 |
76 lines |
Re: "but not for 20 minutes"
|
Dick Hudson |
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:04:41 +0000 |
56 lines |
"but not for 20 minutes"
|
And Rosta |
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 08:27:50 -0000 |
34 lines |
RE: representation of adjuncts
|
c.a. creider |
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 15:10:50 -0500 (EST) |
30 lines |
RE: representation of adjuncts
|
And Rosta |
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 16:08:58 -0000 |
81 lines |
Re: representation of adjuncts
|
c.a. creider |
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 06:45:54 -0500 (EST) |
29 lines |
RE: Above-the-line-ness
|
And Rosta |
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 01:24:39 -0000 |
93 lines |
RE: tests for tense
|
And Rosta |
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 01:24:32 -0000 |
40 lines |
RE: Above-the-line-ness
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 28 Oct 2000 10:33:19 +0100 |
126 lines |
Re: tests for tense
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 21:52:33 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: tests for tense
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 22:35:21 +0200 |
55 lines |
Re: tests for tense
|
c.a. creider |
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 15:00:36 -0400 (EDT) |
47 lines |
Re: tests for tense
|
Carl Burke |
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:03:06 -0400 |
54 lines |
Re: tests for tense
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 18:02:03 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: tests for tense
|
c.a. creider |
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:48:34 -0400 (EDT) |
27 lines |
Re: tests for tense
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:50:16 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: more thoughts on complement subjunctives
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:44:20 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: Above-the-line-ness
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:40:48 +0100 |
77 lines |
Re: Above-the-line-ness
|
Nik Gisborne |
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:37:48 +0800 |
70 lines |
more thoughts on complement subjunctives
|
And Rosta |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 21:44:02 +0100 |
94 lines |
representation of adjuncts
|
And Rosta |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 21:43:59 +0100 |
93 lines |
tests for tense
|
And Rosta |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 21:43:56 +0100 |
23 lines |
Above-the-line-ness
|
And Rosta |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 21:43:31 +0100 |
55 lines |
RE: subjunctive
|
Dick Hudson |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 17:56:02 +0100 |
32 lines |
RE: subjunctive
|
And Rosta |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 16:23:29 +0100 |
84 lines |
RE: sweeping with
|
And Rosta |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 16:23:26 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: sweeping with
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 09:05:24 +0200 |
62 lines |
RE: subjunctive
|
Dick Hudson |
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 19:09:03 +0100 |
75 lines |
RE: Iteratable complements?
|
And Rosta |
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 14:34:10 +0100 |
51 lines |
RE: Iteratable complements?
|
And Rosta |
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 14:34:10 +0100 |
51 lines |
RE: sweeping with
|
And Rosta |
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 14:34:08 +0100 |
61 lines |
Re: Iteratable complements?
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 08:38:21 +0200 |
36 lines |
Re: Iteratable complements?
|
Dick Hudson |
Mon, 23 Oct 2000 21:06:23 +0100 |
46 lines |
RE: subjunctive
|
And Rosta |
Mon, 23 Oct 2000 19:43:35 +0100 |
98 lines |
Iteratable complements?
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Mon, 23 Oct 2000 13:45:26 +0200 |
26 lines |
Re: sweeping with
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Mon, 23 Oct 2000 13:34:18 +0200 |
39 lines |
RE: sweeping with
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 21 Oct 2000 21:57:33 +0100 |
46 lines |
Ungodly Global Warming, Genocide, World Hunger, and Hope
|
<> |
Sat, 21 Oct 2000 16:32:50 -0400 |
297 lines |
Re: subjunctive
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 18:22:55 +0100 |
75 lines |
Re: sweeping with
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 17:51:51 +0100 |
39 lines |
Here you are
|
J.W. Holmes |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 16:28:04 +0200 |
74 lines |
Does sweeping require a broom?
|
Dylan |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:51:00 +0100 |
26 lines |
RE: sweeping with
|
Dick Hudson |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 18:36:19 +0100 |
25 lines |
RE: sweeping with
|
jasp |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:24:51 +0200 |
57 lines |
Re: sweeping with
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:23:08 +0200 |
39 lines |
SLI bibliography
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:52:59 +0200 |
60 lines |
RE: Judgement, please
|
jasp |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:01:14 +0200 |
61 lines |
sweeping with
|
jasp |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:01:12 +0200 |
32 lines |
Re: Judgement, please
|
Karl Sokalski |
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 22:48:15 -0400 |
124 lines |
(no subject)
|
<> |
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 14:48:56 EDT |
21 lines |
RE: Judgement, please
|
Dick Hudson |
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 18:06:09 +0100 |
33 lines |
subjunctive
|
A Rosta |
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 18:02:00 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: Judgement, please
|
Kensei Sugayama |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 01:48:19 +0900 |
76 lines |
RE: Judgement, please
|
A Rosta |
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 17:11:00 +0100 |
31 lines |
RE: Judgement, please
|
Dick Hudson |
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 17:03:56 +0100 |
29 lines |
RE: Judgement, please
|
J.W. Holmes |
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:32:03 +0200 |
32 lines |
RE: Judgement, please
|
A Rosta |
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 12:01:00 +0100 |
19 lines |
Re: Judgement, please
|
A Rosta |
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 11:53:00 +0100 |
52 lines |
RE: Judgement, please
|
A Rosta |
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 11:50:00 +0100 |
76 lines |
Re: Judgement, please
|
c.a. creider |
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 06:32:19 -0400 (EDT) |
77 lines |
RE: Judgement, please
|
jasp |
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 12:13:40 +0200 |
109 lines |
Re: Judgement, please
|
Dylan |
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 02:43:17 +0100 |
64 lines |
Re: Judgement, please
|
Karl Sokalski |
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 19:40:32 -0400 |
77 lines |
Re: Judgement, please
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 22:40:29 +0200 |
74 lines |
Re: Judgement, please
|
Kensei Sugayama |
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 04:45:52 +0900 |
90 lines |
Re: Judgement, please
|
Dick Hudson |
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 19:19:35 +0100 |
53 lines |
Judgement, please
|
Kensei Sugayama |
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 01:44:57 +0900 |
56 lines |
RE: 2 remarks on WG formalism
|
And Rosta |
Sun, 8 Oct 2000 12:09:25 +0100 |
78 lines |
RE: 2 remarks on WG formalism
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 06 Oct 2000 08:53:45 +0100 |
50 lines |
RE: 2 remarks on WG formalism
|
And Rosta |
Thu, 5 Oct 2000 22:41:46 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: 2 remarks on WG formalism
|
Dick Hudson |
Thu, 05 Oct 2000 16:43:41 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: 2 remarks on WG formalism
|
A Rosta |
Thu, 5 Oct 2000 14:21:00 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: 2 remarks on WG formalism
|
Dick Hudson |
Wed, 04 Oct 2000 22:08:16 +0100 |
65 lines |
Re: 2 remarks on WG formalism
|
A Rosta |
Wed, 4 Oct 2000 17:37:00 +0100 |
86 lines |
Re: 2 remarks on WG formalism
|
Dick Hudson |
Tue, 03 Oct 2000 18:06:23 +0100 |
58 lines |
Re: 2 remarks on WG formalism
|
A Rosta |
Tue, 3 Oct 2000 13:08:00 +0100 |
99 lines |
Re: 2 remarks on WG formalism
|
Dick Hudson |
Mon, 02 Oct 2000 19:49:56 +0100 |
78 lines |
Re: 2 remarks on WG formalism
|
A Rosta |
Mon, 2 Oct 2000 17:11:00 +0100 |
88 lines |
Re: 2 remarks on WG formalism
|
Dick Hudson |
Mon, 02 Oct 2000 09:53:30 +0100 |
88 lines |
Re: adjuncts again
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 29 Sep 2000 17:31:19 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: Prepositional specifiers
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Mon, 25 Sep 2000 08:49:45 +0200 |
23 lines |
RE: Prepositional specifiers
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 23 Sep 2000 12:43:00 +0100 |
64 lines |
Re: Prepositional specifiers
|
Dylan |
Thu, 21 Sep 2000 23:40:44 +0100 |
91 lines |
Prepositional specifiers
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Thu, 21 Sep 2000 17:44:41 +0200 |
47 lines |
Re: word classes/parts of speech
|
Nik Gisborne |
Mon, 18 Sep 2000 16:22:17 +0800 |
142 lines |
word classes/parts of speech
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 16 Sep 2000 14:46:11 +0100 |
69 lines |
Re: complementation of WANT
|
A Rosta |
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 17:37:00 +0100 |
218 lines |
Re: complementation of WANT
|
Dylan |
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 15:31:43 +0100 |
344 lines |
complementation of WANT
|
A Rosta |
Mon, 11 Sep 2000 15:23:00 +0100 |
42 lines |
RE: adjuncts again
|
A Rosta |
Mon, 11 Sep 2000 14:04:00 +0100 |
61 lines |
RE: adjuncts again
|
Dylan |
Mon, 11 Sep 2000 09:48:59 +0100 |
283 lines |
RE: adjuncts again
|
And Rosta |
Mon, 11 Sep 2000 01:05:13 +0100 |
247 lines |
RE: adjuncts again
|
And Rosta |
Mon, 11 Sep 2000 00:42:32 +0100 |
38 lines |
RE: adjuncts again
|
c.a. creider |
Sun, 10 Sep 2000 07:32:40 -0400 (EDT) |
57 lines |
RE: adjuncts again
|
c.a. creider |
Sun, 10 Sep 2000 07:21:18 -0400 (EDT) |
193 lines |
RE: adjuncts again
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 9 Sep 2000 13:05:28 +0100 |
289 lines |
Re: adjuncts again
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Sat, 09 Sep 2000 00:01:33 +0200 |
62 lines |
2 remarks on WG formalism
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 8 Sep 2000 21:39:47 +0100 |
76 lines |
adjuncts again
|
c.a. creider |
Fri, 8 Sep 2000 14:54:53 -0400 (EDT) |
189 lines |
Re: inflections
|
A Rosta |
Wed, 6 Sep 2000 13:43:00 +0100 |
86 lines |
FW: inflections
|
A Rosta |
Wed, 6 Sep 2000 13:32:00 +0100 |
73 lines |
RE: sets and collectivities
|
A Rosta |
Tue, 5 Sep 2000 16:42:00 +0100 |
36 lines |
RE: sets and collectivities
|
Dick Hudson |
Mon, 04 Sep 2000 09:54:14 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: inflections
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Mon, 04 Sep 2000 10:05:19 +0200 |
103 lines |
RE: sets and collectivities
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 1 Sep 2000 16:11:49 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: Quantifiers
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 01 Sep 2000 08:46:33 +0100 |
62 lines |
Re: Quantifiers
|
Nik Gisborne |
Fri, 01 Sep 2000 15:06:49 +0800 |
47 lines |
sets and collectivities
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 01 Sep 2000 07:56:21 +0100 |
32 lines |
RE: inflections
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 1 Sep 2000 02:59:41 +0100 |
66 lines |
RE: inflections
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 1 Sep 2000 02:59:39 +0100 |
38 lines |
RE: inflections
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 1 Sep 2000 02:59:36 +0100 |
37 lines |
RE: inflections
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 1 Sep 2000 02:59:36 +0100 |
37 lines |
RE: inflections
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 1 Sep 2000 02:59:20 +0100 |
49 lines |
RE: inflections
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 1 Sep 2000 02:59:20 +0100 |
49 lines |
RE: inflections
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 1 Sep 2000 02:59:20 +0100 |
49 lines |
RE: inflections
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 1 Sep 2000 01:35:22 +0100 |
99 lines |
Quantifiers: PS
|
Dick Hudson |
Thu, 31 Aug 2000 19:34:56 +0100 |
22 lines |
Quantifiers
|
Dick Hudson |
Thu, 31 Aug 2000 16:12:17 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: inflections
|
Dick Hudson |
Thu, 31 Aug 2000 09:47:00 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: inflections
|
J.W. Holmes |
Thu, 31 Aug 2000 09:57:07 +0200 |
44 lines |
Re: inflections
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Wed, 30 Aug 2000 23:10:42 +0200 |
45 lines |
RE: inflections
|
Dick Hudson |
Wed, 30 Aug 2000 09:05:10 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: inflections
|
Dick Hudson |
Wed, 30 Aug 2000 08:54:21 +0100 |
48 lines |
RE: inflections
|
Nik Gisborne |
Wed, 30 Aug 2000 11:40:52 +0800 |
39 lines |
Re: inflections
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Tue, 29 Aug 2000 21:55:56 +0200 |
72 lines |
RE: inflections
|
Dick Hudson |
Tue, 29 Aug 2000 15:43:43 +0100 |
29 lines |
RE: inflections
|
And Rosta |
Tue, 29 Aug 2000 13:43:03 +0100 |
83 lines |
RE: inflections
|
And Rosta |
Tue, 29 Aug 2000 13:43:01 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: inflections
|
Dick Hudson |
Tue, 29 Aug 2000 10:00:24 +0100 |
59 lines |
RE: inflections
|
Dick Hudson |
Tue, 29 Aug 2000 09:20:43 +0100 |
79 lines |
Re: inflections
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Sun, 27 Aug 2000 19:00:08 +0200 |
33 lines |
Re: inflections
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Sun, 27 Aug 2000 17:57:13 +0200 |
141 lines |
RE: inflections
|
And Rosta |
Sun, 27 Aug 2000 01:58:49 +0100 |
75 lines |
RE: inflections
|
And Rosta |
Sun, 27 Aug 2000 01:58:46 +0100 |
97 lines |
RE: inflections
|
And Rosta |
Sun, 27 Aug 2000 01:58:44 +0100 |
80 lines |
RE: inflections
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 26 Aug 2000 02:29:57 +0100 |
63 lines |
RE: inflections
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 26 Aug 2000 02:29:55 +0100 |
86 lines |
Re: inflections
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Fri, 25 Aug 2000 22:14:49 +0200 |
68 lines |
Re: inflections
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 25 Aug 2000 15:03:59 +0100 |
50 lines |
RE: inflections
|
J.W. Holmes |
Fri, 25 Aug 2000 14:54:01 +0200 |
87 lines |
RE: inflections
|
J.W. Holmes |
Fri, 25 Aug 2000 14:21:45 +0200 |
63 lines |
Re: inflections
|
J.W. Holmes |
Fri, 25 Aug 2000 14:16:49 +0200 |
42 lines |
RE: inflections
|
Dick Hudson |
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 16:49:51 +0100 |
62 lines |
RE: inflections
|
Dick Hudson |
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 16:29:25 +0100 |
49 lines |
RE: inflections
|
And Rosta |
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 14:23:00 +0100 |
56 lines |
RE: inflections
|
And Rosta |
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 13:08:22 +0100 |
84 lines |
RE: inflections
|
And Rosta |
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 13:08:19 +0100 |
63 lines |
Re: inflections
|
Dick Hudson |
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 09:54:03 +0100 |
131 lines |
Re: inflections
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 18:23:38 +0200 |
183 lines |
Re: inflections
|
Dick Hudson |
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 08:41:21 +0100 |
112 lines |
Re: Changing registered email address
|
J.W. Holmes |
Mon, 21 Aug 2000 08:36:09 +0200 |
47 lines |
Changing registered email address
|
Dylan |
Fri, 18 Aug 2000 18:19:10 +0100 |
21 lines |
inflections
|
J.W. Holmes |
Thu, 17 Aug 2000 12:32:14 +0200 |
63 lines |
Online materials for English students
|
aa |
Wed, 9 Aug 2000 13:21:20 +0200 (CEST) |
39 lines |
RE: adjuncts
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 28 Jul 2000 20:49:02 +0100 |
143 lines |
RE: subjects and objects
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 28 Jul 2000 20:48:58 +0100 |
64 lines |
Re: adjuncts
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Wed, 26 Jul 2000 17:19:56 +0200 |
110 lines |
RE: subjects and objects
|
Dick Hudson |
Wed, 26 Jul 2000 09:58:50 +0100 |
53 lines |
RE: adjuncts
|
And Rosta |
Wed, 26 Jul 2000 02:22:11 +0100 |
48 lines |
RE: subjects and objects
|
And Rosta |
Wed, 26 Jul 2000 02:22:03 +0100 |
96 lines |
RE: adjuncts
|
And Rosta |
Wed, 26 Jul 2000 02:21:58 +0100 |
195 lines |
RE: adjuncts
|
And Rosta |
Wed, 26 Jul 2000 02:21:52 +0100 |
275 lines |
RE: adjuncts
|
And Rosta |
Wed, 26 Jul 2000 02:21:49 +0100 |
83 lines |
RE: subjects and objects
|
And Rosta |
Wed, 26 Jul 2000 02:21:47 +0100 |
33 lines |
RE: subjects and objects
|
And Rosta |
Wed, 26 Jul 2000 02:21:47 +0100 |
33 lines |
RE: subjects and objects
|
And Rosta |
Wed, 26 Jul 2000 02:21:44 +0100 |
57 lines |
Re: adjuncts
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Tue, 25 Jul 2000 22:40:07 +0200 |
37 lines |
RE: subjects and objects
|
J.W. Holmes |
Mon, 24 Jul 2000 09:14:39 +0200 |
88 lines |
RE: adjuncts
|
Nik Gisborne |
Mon, 24 Jul 2000 14:44:59 +0800 |
192 lines |
RE: adjuncts
|
Nik Gisborne |
Mon, 24 Jul 2000 14:09:18 +0800 |
249 lines |
RE: adjuncts
|
Nik Gisborne |
Mon, 24 Jul 2000 13:42:02 +0800 |
58 lines |
RE: subjects and objects
|
Nik Gisborne |
Mon, 24 Jul 2000 13:35:36 +0800 |
55 lines |
RE: adjuncts
|
And Rosta |
Sun, 23 Jul 2000 09:36:54 +0100 |
149 lines |
RE: subjects and objects
|
Dylan |
Sun, 23 Jul 2000 00:45:21 +0100 |
133 lines |
RE: adjuncts
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 22 Jul 2000 15:47:51 +0100 |
36 lines |
RE: adjuncts
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 22 Jul 2000 15:47:47 +0100 |
64 lines |
RE: adjuncts
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 22 Jul 2000 15:47:40 +0100 |
181 lines |
RE: subjects and objects
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 22 Jul 2000 15:47:36 +0100 |
75 lines |
RE: subjects and objects
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 22 Jul 2000 10:23:50 +0100 |
56 lines |
RE: subjects and objects
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 22 Jul 2000 10:23:47 +0100 |
40 lines |
RE: subjects and objects
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 22 Jul 2000 10:23:43 +0100 |
120 lines |
Re: adjuncts
|
Nik Gisborne |
Fri, 21 Jul 2000 14:55:14 +0800 |
97 lines |
Re: adjuncts
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Thu, 20 Jul 2000 12:40:27 +0200 |
55 lines |
adjuncts
|
Dick Hudson |
Wed, 19 Jul 2000 10:09:50 +0100 |
106 lines |
Re: subjects and objects
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Tue, 18 Jul 2000 21:49:24 +0200 |
52 lines |
Re: subjects and objects
|
A Rosta |
Tue, 18 Jul 2000 13:57:00 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: subjects and objects
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Tue, 18 Jul 2000 12:48:57 +0200 |
87 lines |
Re: subjects and objects
|
Nik Gisborne |
Tue, 18 Jul 2000 10:44:10 +0800 |
54 lines |
RE: subjects and objects
|
Dick Hudson |
Mon, 17 Jul 2000 17:52:59 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: subjects and objects
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Mon, 17 Jul 2000 14:33:12 +0200 |
36 lines |
RE: subjects and objects
|
J.W. Holmes |
Mon, 17 Jul 2000 11:38:22 +0200 |
53 lines |
Re: subjects and objects
|
J.W. Holmes |
Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:37:46 +0200 |
62 lines |
RE: subjects and objects
|
J.W. Holmes |
Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:25:32 +0200 |
176 lines |
RE: subjects and objects
|
Dylan |
Sun, 16 Jul 2000 22:49:04 +0100 |
45 lines |
RE: subjects and objects
|
And Rosta |
Sun, 16 Jul 2000 13:14:38 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: subjects and objects
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Fri, 14 Jul 2000 23:12:27 +0200 |
25 lines |
Re: subjects and objects
|
A Rosta |
Fri, 14 Jul 2000 14:00:00 +0100 |
42 lines |
RE: subjects and objects
|
A Rosta |
Fri, 14 Jul 2000 13:31:00 +0100 |
135 lines |
Re: subjects and objects
|
J.W. Holmes |
Fri, 14 Jul 2000 10:10:11 +0200 |
73 lines |
Re: subjects and objects
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:45:14 +0100 |
67 lines |
subjects and objects
|
J.W. Holmes |
Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:49:49 +0200 |
87 lines |
LAGB
|
Dick Hudson |
Tue, 11 Jul 2000 16:35:17 +0100 |
428 lines |
Re: attributive adjectives
|
A Rosta |
Tue, 11 Jul 2000 13:35:00 +0100 |
70 lines |
Re: attributive adjectives
|
Dick Hudson |
Tue, 11 Jul 2000 07:48:07 +0100 |
46 lines |
attributive adjectives
|
And Rosta |
Mon, 10 Jul 2000 21:37:45 +0100 |
51 lines |
WG course material
|
Dick Hudson |
Wed, 21 Jun 2000 08:24:09 +0100 |
24 lines |
RE: adjacency in WG
|
Dick Hudson |
Tue, 20 Jun 2000 13:02:22 +0100 |
45 lines |
RE: adjacency in WG
|
Dylan |
Mon, 19 Jun 2000 21:57:02 +0100 |
55 lines |
RE: adjacency in WG
|
And Rosta |
Mon, 19 Jun 2000 14:00:03 +0100 |
216 lines |
RE: adjacency in WG
|
Dick Hudson |
Mon, 19 Jun 2000 09:10:19 +0100 |
167 lines |
RE: adjacency in WG
|
Dylan |
Sat, 17 Jun 2000 15:21:20 +0100 |
138 lines |
RE: adjacency in WG
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 17 Jun 2000 14:18:27 +0100 |
116 lines |
Re: adjacency in WG
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 16 Jun 2000 16:19:54 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: adjacency in WG
|
c.a. creider |
Fri, 16 Jun 2000 07:14:14 -0400 (EDT) |
35 lines |
adjacency in WG
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 16 Jun 2000 08:23:21 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: WG bibliography
|
J.W. Holmes |
Thu, 15 Jun 2000 17:17:48 +0200 |
73 lines |
Re: WG bibliography
|
Kensei Sugayama |
Thu, 15 Jun 2000 23:47:58 +0900 |
58 lines |
Re: WG bibliography
|
Dick Hudson |
Thu, 15 Jun 2000 15:31:38 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: WG bibliography
|
A Rosta |
Thu, 15 Jun 2000 13:21:00 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: WG bibliography
|
Dick Hudson |
Wed, 14 Jun 2000 20:20:16 +0100 |
62 lines |
Sorry
|
Kensei Sugayama |
Thu, 15 Jun 2000 01:20:11 +0900 |
33 lines |
Re: WG bibliography
|
Kensei Sugayama |
Thu, 15 Jun 2000 01:06:13 +0900 |
404 lines |
WG bibliography
|
Dick Hudson |
Mon, 12 Jun 2000 16:15:27 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: intonation
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Thu, 01 Jun 2000 10:09:38 +0200 |
39 lines |
Re: intonation
|
A Rosta |
Wed, 31 May 2000 18:06:00 +0100 |
127 lines |
Re: No longer just eggheads, linguists leap to the Net (fwd)
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Wed, 31 May 2000 18:59:02 +0200 |
36 lines |
Re: intonation
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Wed, 31 May 2000 10:29:02 +0200 |
111 lines |
No longer just eggheads, linguists leap to the Net (fwd)
|
Nik Gisborne |
Wed, 31 May 2000 13:43:06 +0800 |
27 lines |
RE: intonation
|
And Rosta |
Tue, 30 May 2000 16:47:07 +0100 |
168 lines |
Re: intonation
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Mon, 29 May 2000 08:15:01 +0200 |
33 lines |
Re: intonation
|
Nik Gisborne |
Mon, 29 May 2000 12:35:58 +0800 |
28 lines |
Re: intonation
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Sun, 28 May 2000 23:26:50 +0200 |
110 lines |
RE: Need
|
Dick Hudson |
Tue, 16 May 2000 08:39:01 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: Need
|
Karl Sokalski |
Mon, 15 May 2000 23:44:20 -0400 |
34 lines |
RE: intonation
|
And Rosta |
Mon, 15 May 2000 19:06:47 +0100 |
70 lines |
RE: Need
|
And Rosta |
Mon, 15 May 2000 19:06:42 +0100 |
159 lines |
Re: "why"-phase in lg acq
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Mon, 15 May 2000 17:43:13 +0200 |
38 lines |
RE: Need (it's a Pittsburgh specialty)
|
Dick Hudson |
Mon, 15 May 2000 12:54:23 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: intonation
|
Dick Hudson |
Mon, 15 May 2000 12:29:45 +0100 |
50 lines |
RE: Need (it's a Pittsburgh specialty)
|
And Rosta |
Mon, 15 May 2000 12:26:07 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: Need
|
Dick Hudson |
Mon, 15 May 2000 11:41:08 +0100 |
37 lines |
RE: Need
|
Dick Hudson |
Mon, 15 May 2000 08:42:52 +0100 |
77 lines |
RE: Need
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 13 May 2000 12:26:51 +0100 |
128 lines |
RE: Need (it's a Pittsburgh specialty)
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 13 May 2000 12:26:48 +0100 |
32 lines |
intonation
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 13 May 2000 12:26:44 +0100 |
42 lines |
"why"-phase in lg acq
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 13 May 2000 12:26:41 +0100 |
17 lines |
Re: Need (it's a Pittsburgh specialty)
|
Karl Sokalski |
Fri, 12 May 2000 23:18:19 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: Need
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Sat, 13 May 2000 00:24:09 +0200 |
101 lines |
Re: Need (it's a Pittsburgh specialty)
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Sat, 13 May 2000 00:08:42 +0200 |
84 lines |
Please reply
|
M.Arshad Ali Ch. |
Fri, 12 May 2000 13:31:13 GMT |
86 lines |
Re: Need (it's a Pittsburgh specialty)
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 12 May 2000 09:42:15 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: Need
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 12 May 2000 09:36:16 +0100 |
88 lines |
Re: Need (it's a Pittsburgh specialty)
|
Karl Sokalski |
Thu, 11 May 2000 19:32:38 -0400 |
120 lines |
Need
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Thu, 11 May 2000 19:31:27 +0200 |
47 lines |
Re: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians
|
<> |
Fri, 28 Apr 2000 06:26:59 -0400 (EDT) |
100 lines |
RE: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 28 Apr 2000 08:47:50 +0100 |
37 lines |
RE: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians
|
And Rosta |
Thu, 27 Apr 2000 21:03:21 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: SUBJ-VERB AGREEMENT
|
Dick Hudson |
Thu, 27 Apr 2000 11:37:37 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: 11.944, Books: Available For Review
|
Dick Hudson |
Wed, 26 Apr 2000 12:48:01 +0100 |
38 lines |
oops!
|
J.W. Holmes |
Wed, 26 Apr 2000 11:30:42 +0200 |
14 lines |
Re: 11.944, Books: Available For Review
|
J.W. Holmes |
Wed, 26 Apr 2000 09:52:49 +0200 |
341 lines |
11.944, Books: Available For Review
|
Dick Hudson |
Wed, 26 Apr 2000 08:12:13 +0100 |
310 lines |
Re: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Wed, 26 Apr 2000 08:54:19 +0200 |
39 lines |
Re: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians
|
Dick Hudson |
Tue, 25 Apr 2000 21:28:36 +0100 |
122 lines |
Re: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians
|
A Rosta |
Mon, 10 Apr 2000 17:27:00 +0100 |
52 lines |
RE: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians
|
A Rosta |
Mon, 10 Apr 2000 17:24:00 +0100 |
38 lines |
unsubscribe word grammar
|
Julie Tochel |
10 Apr 00 15:45:43 BST |
16 lines |
Re: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians
|
Nik Gisborne |
Mon, 10 Apr 2000 22:16:59 +0800 |
48 lines |
Re: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians
|
Karl Sokalski |
Mon, 10 Apr 2000 05:15:04 -0700 (PDT) |
120 lines |
Re: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians
|
J.W. Holmes |
Mon, 10 Apr 2000 08:39:07 +0200 |
42 lines |
RE: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians
|
Nik Gisborne |
Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:06:36 +0800 |
27 lines |
Re: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Sun, 09 Apr 2000 11:57:31 +0200 |
43 lines |
Re: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Sun, 09 Apr 2000 11:49:49 +0200 |
45 lines |
RE: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians
|
<> |
Sat, 8 Apr 2000 17:15:51 -0400 (EDT) |
74 lines |
RE: FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 8 Apr 2000 21:52:42 +0100 |
98 lines |
Re: SUBJ-VERB AGREEMENT
|
Carl Burke |
Fri, 07 Apr 2000 16:57:17 -0400 |
29 lines |
SUBJ-VERB AGREEMENT
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 7 Apr 2000 21:00:56 +0100 |
30 lines |
FYI--mediaeval Arabic grammarians
|
<> |
Fri, 7 Apr 2000 09:19:26 -0400 (EDT) |
57 lines |
Re: 2 Qs on passives
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Mon, 03 Apr 2000 17:31:10 +0200 |
65 lines |
Re: 2 Qs on passives
|
Dick Hudson |
Mon, 03 Apr 2000 10:42:52 +0100 |
62 lines |
Re: 2 Qs on passives
|
J.W. Holmes |
Mon, 3 Apr 2000 08:53:09 +0200 |
30 lines |
Re: 2 Qs on passives
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Sun, 02 Apr 2000 12:13:04 +0200 |
86 lines |
what's your address, joe?
|
J.W. Holmes |
Fri, 31 Mar 2000 08:36:43 +0200 |
23 lines |
Re: 2 Qs on passives
|
Dick Hudson |
Wed, 29 Mar 2000 22:39:40 +0100 |
51 lines |
2 Qs on passives
|
A Rosta |
Wed, 29 Mar 2000 18:03:00 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: Lx in 2020
|
Dick Hudson |
Tue, 28 Mar 2000 08:51:35 +0100 |
46 lines |
|
JAMES THOMAS |
Mon, 27 Mar 2000 14:57:46 MET |
13 lines |
Re: Objects and that-clauses
|
J.W. Holmes |
Mon, 27 Mar 2000 14:38:24 +0200 |
112 lines |
Re: Lx in 2020
|
J.W. Holmes |
Mon, 27 Mar 2000 14:14:02 +0200 |
31 lines |
RE: Objects and that-clauses
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 25 Mar 2000 21:51:45 -0000 |
147 lines |
RE: Objects and that-clauses
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 25 Mar 2000 13:22:11 -0000 |
48 lines |
RE: Objects and that-clauses
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 25 Mar 2000 13:22:08 -0000 |
78 lines |
Re: Objects and that-clauses
|
Anja Lowit |
Fri, 24 Mar 2000 09:40:08 -0800 |
56 lines |
Re: Objects and that-clauses
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Fri, 24 Mar 2000 13:09:32 +0100 |
59 lines |
Re: Objects and that-clauses
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Fri, 24 Mar 2000 09:29:35 +0100 |
134 lines |
RE: Objects and that-clauses
|
And Rosta |
Thu, 23 Mar 2000 22:24:57 -0000 |
120 lines |
RE: Objects and that-clauses
|
And Rosta |
Thu, 23 Mar 2000 22:11:26 -0000 |
46 lines |
Re: Objects and that-clauses
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Thu, 23 Mar 2000 09:58:11 +0100 |
88 lines |
Re: Objects and that-clauses
|
Dick Hudson |
Wed, 22 Mar 2000 18:18:54 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: Objects and that-clauses
|
A Rosta |
Wed, 22 Mar 2000 14:06:00 -0000 |
58 lines |
Re: Objects and that-clauses
|
A Rosta |
Wed, 22 Mar 2000 13:58:00 -0000 |
68 lines |
Re: Objects and that-clauses
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Wed, 22 Mar 2000 14:36:55 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: Objects and that-clauses
|
<> |
Wed, 22 Mar 2000 08:08:39 -0500 (EST) |
34 lines |
Objects and that-clauses
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Wed, 22 Mar 2000 13:51:24 +0100 |
27 lines |
RE: Lx in 20 years time
|
A Rosta |
Tue, 21 Mar 2000 14:59:00 -0000 |
34 lines |
Lx in 2020
|
Dick Hudson |
Tue, 21 Mar 2000 09:08:35 +0000 |
37 lines |
The LAD goes to school
|
Dick Hudson |
Mon, 20 Mar 2000 21:40:15 +0000 |
27 lines |
The LAD goes to school
|
Dick Hudson |
Mon, 20 Mar 2000 19:53:14 +0000 |
20 lines |
Re: Lx in 20 years time
|
<> |
Sun, 19 Mar 2000 21:10:16 -0500 (EST) |
46 lines |
Lx in 20 years time
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Sun, 19 Mar 2000 10:01:22 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: LAD reference
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Fri, 17 Mar 2000 14:05:45 +0100 |
29 lines |
LAD reference
|
J.W. Holmes |
Fri, 17 Mar 2000 13:04:54 +0100 |
23 lines |
[Fwd: A Farewell to Nim Chimpsky]
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Wed, 15 Mar 2000 18:34:34 +0100 |
73 lines |
RE: 'GRs'
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 11 Mar 2000 04:53:09 -0000 |
197 lines |
RE: 'GRs'
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 11 Mar 2000 04:53:07 -0000 |
92 lines |
RE: 'GRs'
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 11 Mar 2000 04:53:04 -0000 |
61 lines |
RE: 'GRs'
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 11 Mar 2000 04:53:01 -0000 |
58 lines |
RE: 'GRs'
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 11 Mar 2000 02:26:03 -0000 |
210 lines |
RE: 'GRs'
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 11 Mar 2000 02:25:59 -0000 |
174 lines |
RE: 'GRs'
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 11 Mar 2000 02:25:57 -0000 |
42 lines |
Re: 'GRs'
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 10 Mar 2000 09:18:25 +0000 |
137 lines |
Re: 'GRs'
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Fri, 10 Mar 2000 08:28:25 +0100 |
57 lines |
Re: 'GRs'
|
Nik Gisborne |
Fri, 10 Mar 2000 11:18:27 +0800 |
124 lines |
Re: 'GRs'
|
Nik Gisborne |
Fri, 10 Mar 2000 10:37:26 +0800 |
36 lines |
Re: 'GRs'
|
Dick Hudson |
Thu, 09 Mar 2000 11:22:28 +0000 |
26 lines |
Re: 'GRs'
|
Nik Gisborne |
Thu, 09 Mar 2000 19:06:35 +0800 |
49 lines |
Re: 'GRs'
|
Dick Hudson |
Thu, 09 Mar 2000 09:56:39 +0000 |
66 lines |
Re: 'GRs'
|
Nik Gisborne |
Thu, 09 Mar 2000 12:34:28 +0800 |
30 lines |
Re: 'GRs'
|
Nik Gisborne |
Thu, 09 Mar 2000 09:16:49 +0800 |
63 lines |
Re: 'GRs'
|
Nik Gisborne |
Thu, 09 Mar 2000 09:02:23 +0800 |
48 lines |
Re: 'GRs'
|
Dick Hudson |
Wed, 08 Mar 2000 20:29:21 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: 'GRs'
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Wed, 08 Mar 2000 16:29:41 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: 'GRs'
|
<> |
Wed, 8 Mar 2000 08:12:09 -0500 (EST) |
38 lines |
Re: 'GRs'
|
<> |
Wed, 8 Mar 2000 06:31:12 -0500 (EST) |
109 lines |
Re: 'GRs'
|
Nik Gisborne |
Wed, 08 Mar 2000 14:02:57 +0800 |
26 lines |
Re: 'GRs'
|
Nik Gisborne |
Wed, 08 Mar 2000 11:32:49 +0800 |
122 lines |
Re: 'GRs'
|
Dick Hudson |
Tue, 07 Mar 2000 20:41:07 +0000 |
31 lines |
'GRs'
|
A Rosta |
Tue, 7 Mar 2000 18:50:00 -0000 |
51 lines |
agreement
|
J.W. Holmes |
Tue, 7 Mar 2000 11:08:20 +0100 |
18 lines |
Re: British agreement
|
Dick Hudson |
Tue, 07 Mar 2000 09:13:40 +0000 |
46 lines |
Re: British agreement
|
A Rosta |
Mon, 6 Mar 2000 17:52:00 -0000 |
26 lines |
RE: British agreement
|
And Rosta |
Sun, 5 Mar 2000 17:35:39 -0000 |
100 lines |
Re: British agreement
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Sun, 05 Mar 2000 01:52:06 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: British agreement
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Sun, 05 Mar 2000 01:46:56 +0100 |
67 lines |
more linguistic humour
|
<> |
Fri, 3 Mar 2000 20:52:19 -0500 (EST) |
86 lines |
Re: British agreement
|
<> |
Fri, 3 Mar 2000 20:44:06 -0500 (EST) |
61 lines |
RE: British agreement
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 3 Mar 2000 23:21:52 -0000 |
55 lines |
Re: British agreement
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Fri, 03 Mar 2000 21:07:30 +0100 |
67 lines |
Re: British agreement
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 03 Mar 2000 16:34:41 +0000 |
57 lines |
British agreement
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Fri, 03 Mar 2000 11:14:37 +0100 |
42 lines |
RE: wg colloquium?
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Wed, 02 Feb 2000 23:00:16 +0100 |
20 lines |
RE: er and ee
|
A Rosta |
Wed, 2 Feb 2000 13:50:00 -0000 |
149 lines |
RE: er and ee
|
Nik Gisborne |
Wed, 02 Feb 2000 11:53:37 +0800 |
35 lines |
RE: er and ee
|
Dick Hudson |
Tue, 01 Feb 2000 19:38:47 +0000 |
87 lines |
RE: er and ee
|
A Rosta |
Tue, 1 Feb 2000 13:57:00 -0000 |
121 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
A Rosta |
Tue, 1 Feb 2000 13:24:00 -0000 |
153 lines |
stored regularly inflected forms
|
Dick Hudson |
Tue, 01 Feb 2000 10:41:43 +0000 |
37 lines |
have/be
|
Dick Hudson |
Tue, 01 Feb 2000 08:57:50 +0000 |
48 lines |
have/be
|
Dick Hudson |
Tue, 01 Feb 2000 08:57:50 +0000 |
48 lines |
er and ee
|
Dick Hudson |
Tue, 01 Feb 2000 08:51:59 +0000 |
101 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
J.W. Holmes |
Mon, 31 Jan 2000 19:22:26 +0100 |
65 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
J.W. Holmes |
Mon, 31 Jan 2000 19:01:26 +0100 |
121 lines |
RE: wg colloquium?
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 29 Jan 2000 19:03:07 -0000 |
25 lines |
Re: wg colloquium?
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:12:25 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: wg colloquium?
|
Kensei Sugayama |
Fri, 28 Jan 2000 12:32:11 +0900 |
48 lines |
Re: wg colloquium?
|
Nik Gisborne |
Fri, 28 Jan 2000 09:01:51 +0800 |
42 lines |
Re: wg colloquium?
|
J.W. Holmes |
Thu, 27 Jan 2000 17:02:50 +0100 |
33 lines |
wg colloquium?
|
A Rosta |
Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:03:00 -0000 |
17 lines |
Re: storage of regulars
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Tue, 25 Jan 2000 19:09:45 +0100 |
52 lines |
storage of regulars
|
A Rosta |
Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:54:00 -0000 |
13 lines |
Re: the nature of word tokens (was: RE: invisible doohickeys)
|
A Rosta |
Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:33:00 -0000 |
169 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
A Rosta |
Thu, 13 Jan 2000 14:49:00 -0000 |
155 lines |
Jasper on er
|
A Rosta |
Thu, 13 Jan 2000 14:23:00 -0000 |
37 lines |
Re: the nature of word tokens (was: RE: invisible doohickeys)
|
Dick Hudson |
Tue, 11 Jan 2000 08:38:46 +0000 |
118 lines |
Re: the nature of word tokens (was: RE: invisible doohickeys)
|
J.W. Holmes |
Mon, 10 Jan 2000 14:26:33 +0100 |
54 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
Dick Hudson |
Mon, 10 Jan 2000 10:38:19 +0000 |
85 lines |
RE: Jasper on er
|
Dick Hudson |
Mon, 10 Jan 2000 10:02:17 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: without a trace
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Mon, 10 Jan 2000 08:44:54 +0100 |
51 lines |
RE: Jasper on er
|
Nik Gisborne |
Mon, 10 Jan 2000 15:02:45 +0800 |
57 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
Nik Gisborne |
Mon, 10 Jan 2000 08:34:29 +0800 |
61 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
And Rosta |
Sun, 9 Jan 2000 21:01:29 -0000 |
67 lines |
RE: without a trace
|
And Rosta |
Sun, 9 Jan 2000 21:01:23 -0000 |
95 lines |
RE: Jasper on er
|
And Rosta |
Sun, 9 Jan 2000 19:21:17 -0000 |
48 lines |
Re: without a trace
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Sun, 09 Jan 2000 16:38:31 +0100 |
80 lines |
Re: Jasper on er
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Sun, 09 Jan 2000 16:36:35 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: invisible doohickeys
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Sun, 09 Jan 2000 09:53:45 +0100 |
94 lines |
the nature of word tokens (was: RE: invisible doohickeys)
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 8 Jan 2000 19:06:04 -0000 |
122 lines |
RE: Jasper on er
|
<> |
Sat, 8 Jan 2000 08:42:55 -0500 (EST) |
86 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 8 Jan 2000 12:57:09 -0000 |
85 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 8 Jan 2000 12:56:55 -0000 |
84 lines |
RE: "He did it god knows why"?
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 8 Jan 2000 12:56:51 -0000 |
30 lines |
RE: "what colour hair"
|
And Rosta |
Fri, 7 Jan 2000 15:45:58 -0000 |
69 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 07 Jan 2000 12:33:56 +0000 |
38 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
Dick Hudson |
Fri, 07 Jan 2000 11:50:26 +0000 |
48 lines |
Re: "He did it god knows why"?
|
J.W. Holmes |
Fri, 7 Jan 2000 10:53:11 +0100 |
50 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
J.W. Holmes |
Fri, 7 Jan 2000 10:28:07 +0100 |
70 lines |
Re: invisible doohickeys
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Fri, 07 Jan 2000 10:25:38 +0100 |
65 lines |
Re: invisible doohickeys
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Fri, 07 Jan 2000 09:16:03 +0100 |
28 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
And Rosta |
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 22:41:12 -0000 |
55 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
And Rosta |
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 22:41:07 -0000 |
58 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
And Rosta |
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 22:41:00 -0000 |
37 lines |
Re: "what colour hair"
|
Dick Hudson |
Thu, 06 Jan 2000 19:57:22 +0000 |
40 lines |
new name for extractee sought
|
And Rosta |
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 16:46:48 -0000 |
20 lines |
"what colour hair"
|
And Rosta |
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 16:46:45 -0000 |
27 lines |
"He did it god knows why"?
|
And Rosta |
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 16:46:42 -0000 |
17 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
Dick Hudson |
Thu, 06 Jan 2000 16:05:06 +0000 |
65 lines |
RE: known & asserted propositions
|
Dick Hudson |
Thu, 06 Jan 2000 15:52:09 +0000 |
24 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
Dick Hudson |
Thu, 06 Jan 2000 15:49:54 +0000 |
48 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
J.W. Holmes |
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 14:53:50 +0100 |
51 lines |
without a trace
|
And Rosta |
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 01:22:54 -0000 |
65 lines |
RE: known & asserted propositions
|
And Rosta |
Wed, 5 Jan 2000 21:35:00 -0000 |
44 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
And Rosta |
Wed, 5 Jan 2000 21:34:54 -0000 |
122 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
And Rosta |
Wed, 5 Jan 2000 18:31:47 -0000 |
152 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
And Rosta |
Wed, 5 Jan 2000 18:31:44 -0000 |
53 lines |
Re: known & asserted propositions
|
Dick Hudson |
Wed, 05 Jan 2000 16:59:29 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: invisible doohickeys
|
Dick Hudson |
Wed, 05 Jan 2000 16:49:26 +0000 |
73 lines |
Re: 'MEISM'
|
J.W. Holmes |
Wed, 5 Jan 2000 16:14:53 +0100 |
32 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
And Rosta |
Wed, 5 Jan 2000 14:04:16 -0000 |
138 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
And Rosta |
Wed, 5 Jan 2000 14:04:13 -0000 |
68 lines |
'MEISM'
|
And Rosta |
Wed, 5 Jan 2000 14:04:10 -0000 |
20 lines |
known & asserted propositions
|
And Rosta |
Wed, 5 Jan 2000 14:04:07 -0000 |
20 lines |
Re: invisible doohickeys
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Wed, 05 Jan 2000 13:50:08 +0100 |
117 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
Dick Hudson |
Wed, 05 Jan 2000 10:28:37 +0000 |
28 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
And Rosta |
Tue, 4 Jan 2000 22:39:00 -0000 |
116 lines |
from my data collection (was: RE: invisible doohickeys)
|
And Rosta |
Tue, 4 Jan 2000 22:38:50 -0000 |
46 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
Dick Hudson |
Tue, 04 Jan 2000 14:15:53 +0000 |
46 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
Dick Hudson |
Tue, 04 Jan 2000 14:06:04 +0000 |
86 lines |
Re: invisible doohickeys
|
Dick Hudson |
Tue, 04 Jan 2000 08:10:25 +0000 |
29 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
Nik Gisborne |
Tue, 04 Jan 2000 13:24:20 +0800 |
50 lines |
Re: invisible doohickeys
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Mon, 03 Jan 2000 21:35:20 +0100 |
93 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
And Rosta |
Mon, 3 Jan 2000 19:12:54 -0000 |
58 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
And Rosta |
Mon, 3 Jan 2000 19:12:50 -0000 |
41 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
And Rosta |
Mon, 3 Jan 2000 19:12:46 -0000 |
38 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
And Rosta |
Mon, 3 Jan 2000 19:12:42 -0000 |
42 lines |
RE: formulating a c-selection rule
|
And Rosta |
Mon, 3 Jan 2000 19:12:38 -0000 |
40 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
And Rosta |
Mon, 3 Jan 2000 16:45:44 -0000 |
136 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
J.W. Holmes |
Mon, 3 Jan 2000 10:16:57 +0100 |
49 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
J.W. Holmes |
Mon, 3 Jan 2000 10:00:25 +0100 |
28 lines |
RE: formulating a c-selection rule
|
J.W. Holmes |
Mon, 3 Jan 2000 09:28:03 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: invisible doohickeys
|
Nik Gisborne |
Mon, 03 Jan 2000 15:25:21 +0800 |
37 lines |
Re: invisible doohickeys
|
Joseph Hilferty |
Sun, 02 Jan 2000 23:03:22 +0100 |
93 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 1 Jan 2000 18:18:35 -0000 |
186 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 1 Jan 2000 13:27:35 -0000 |
91 lines |
RE: invisible doohickeys
|
And Rosta |
Sat, 1 Jan 2000 13:27:29 -0000 |
130 lines |