|
|
|
Size
|
Re: VPRED overall mean?
|
Ruth Butler |
Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:15:21 +1200 |
129 lines |
Re: VPRED overall mean?
|
sue welham (RRes-Roth) |
Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:24:57 +0100 |
86 lines |
VPRED overall mean?
|
Ruth Butler |
Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:32:14 +1200 |
54 lines |
R2 in LMMs
|
Gordon, Alan |
Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:05:36 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: Intra-class correlation
|
peterwlane |
Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:18:14 +0100 |
174 lines |
Significant F but no mean separation: summary
|
Potter, Fred |
Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:21:29 +1200 |
34 lines |
Re: Intra-class correlation
|
sue welham (RRes-Roth) |
Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:38:32 +0100 |
67 lines |
Intra-class correlation
|
Peter Lane |
Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:22:36 +0100 |
87 lines |
Re: RWALD
|
Jeff Wood |
Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:43:34 +1000 |
33 lines |
Intraclass correlation
|
Peter Lane |
Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:17:50 +0100 |
69 lines |
Re: covariate in a mixed model?
|
<> |
Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:02:37 +0100 |
128 lines |
covariate in a mixed model?
|
Christof Pietsch |
Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:17:41 +0100 |
170 lines |
Re: R-Squared in a LMM
|
Alison Colyer |
Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:43:05 +0100 |
23 lines |
Re: R-Squared in a LMM
|
<> |
Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:48:11 +0100 |
111 lines |
Re: R-Squared in a LMM
|
Sedcole, Richard |
Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:46:24 +1200 |
36 lines |
R-Squared in a LMM
|
Gordon, Alan |
Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:34:53 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: Strange effects of RESTRICT
|
<> |
Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:59:23 +0100 |
75 lines |
Re: Significant F-prob but no mean separation
|
<> |
Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:52:41 +0100 |
67 lines |
Re: Strange effects of RESTRICT
|
David Baird |
Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:51:04 +1200 |
68 lines |
Re: Strange effects of RESTRICT
|
Potter, Fred |
Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:56:09 +1200 |
51 lines |
Re: Significant F-prob but no mean separation
|
<> |
Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:24:10 +0100 |
16 lines |
Strange effects of RESTRICT
|
<> |
Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:08:03 +0100 |
14 lines |
Re: Significant F-prob but no mean separation
|
Patrick J Laycock |
Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:21:49 +0100 |
139 lines |
Re: Dendrograms
|
Roger Payne |
Tue, 9 Jun 2009 19:54:32 +0100 |
72 lines |
Dendrograms
|
Carole Wright |
Tue, 9 Jun 2009 06:21:58 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: Significant F-prob but no mean separation
|
Sedcole, Richard |
Wed, 3 Jun 2009 18:59:00 +1200 |
63 lines |
Re: Significant F-prob but no mean separation
|
David Baird |
Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:19:51 +1200 |
79 lines |
Re: Significant F-prob but no mean separation
|
Potter, Fred |
Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:09:53 +1200 |
26 lines |
Re: Significant F-prob but no mean separation
|
Potter, Fred |
Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:03:54 +1200 |
74 lines |
Re: Significant F-prob but no mean separation
|
Potter, Fred |
Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:57:06 +1200 |
75 lines |
Re: Significant F-prob but no mean separation
|
Dave Saville |
Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:34:57 +1200 |
49 lines |
Significant F-prob but no mean separation
|
Potter, Fred |
Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:30:12 +1200 |
30 lines |
Re: Offset in Poisson regression
|
Peter Lane |
Mon, 1 Jun 2009 10:06:56 +0100 |
133 lines |