JISCMail - PORIFERA Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

PORIFERA Archives

October 2010

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		PORIFERA Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	From	Date	Size
PDF reprint	Dairo Alexander Escobar Ardila	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:53:40 -0500	35 lines
Comments Sought on US National Biodiversity Observation Network	Collins, Allen	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:00:46 -0400	39 lines
Bibliographic databases	Jean VACELET	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:35:55 +0200	74 lines
PDF Reprint	Dairo Alexander Escobar Ardila	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:35:44 -0500	117 lines
Re: Malawispongia	Calhoun Bond	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:26:28 -0400	231 lines
Re: Malawispongia	Alan Duckworth	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 06:42:05 -0700	103 lines
Malawispongia	Carsten Klarborg Larsen	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:52:50 +0100	28 lines
Re: Need morphology always be required for new species descriptions?	[log in to unmask]	Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:41:57 +0200	228 lines
Re: Need morphology always be required for new species descriptions?	Lopez, Jose	Sun, 24 Oct 2010 23:23:41 -0400	322 lines
New article on sponge fatty acids	Sven Zea	Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:56:10 -0500	99 lines
WPD now links to Sponge Barcoding Database	Gert Wörheide	Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:34:49 +0200	53 lines
Re: Need morphology always be required for new species descriptions?	Collins, Allen	Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:10:01 -0400	150 lines
Re: Need morphology always be required for new species descriptions?	Gert Wörheide	Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:09:45 +0200	82 lines
Re: Need morphology always be required for new species descriptions?	Michael Nickel	Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:59:59 +0200	375 lines
Re: Need morphology always be required for new species descriptions?	Soest, Rob van	Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:21:56 +0200	265 lines
Re: Need morphology always be required for new species descriptions?	Oliver Voigt	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:30:07 +0200	991 lines
Re: Need morphology always be required for new species descriptions?	Antonio Sole Cava	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:04:59 -0200	823 lines
Re: Need morphology always be required for new species descriptions?	Oliver Voigt	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:08:54 +0200	580 lines
Re: Need morphology always be required for new species descriptions?	Antonio Sole Cava	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:39:18 -0200	241 lines
Re: Need morphology always be required for new species descriptions?	John Hooper	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:24:25 +1000	155 lines
Re: Need morphology always be required for new species descriptions?	Collins, Allen	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 06:45:31 -0400	162 lines
Re: Need morphology always be required for new species descriptions?	Antonio Sole Cava	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:09:05 -0200	126 lines
Need morphology always be required for new species descriptions?	Gert Wörheide	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:37:33 +0200	50 lines
Rejected posting messages	Bernard Picton	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:36:54 +0100	34 lines
Graduate student position in Comparative Genomics and Phylogenomics of Sponges	Dennis Lavrov	Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:18:36 -0500	645 lines
sponge minisymposium for the 12th ICRS in Cairns?	Christine Schoenberg	Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:30:49 +0800	225 lines
Test - wrong delivery messages	Bernard Picton	Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:06:55 +0100	33 lines
Re: List Server problems (wrong delivery reports)	Bernard Picton	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:00:17 +0100	55 lines
List Server problems (wrong delivery reports)	Michael Nickel	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 14:52:41 +0200	99 lines
Re: new functionality in WPD	Pansini Maurizio	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 14:49:28 +0200	156 lines
World Porifera Database	Soest, Rob van	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 14:38:00 +0200	137 lines
new functionality in WPD	Soest, Rob van	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 14:01:26 +0200	131 lines
Thanks for Bowerbank 1858	Cintia Rua	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 07:10:55 -0700	32 lines
Bowerbank, 1858	Cintia Rua	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 05:27:07 -0700	91 lines
Re: Great Meeting!!	Lopez, Jose	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:43:32 -0400	42 lines
Thanks/9th WSC/Sponge: 32 years on	Dave Abdo	Tue, 12 Oct 2010 04:37:59 +0100	40 lines
Re: Great meeting, open sharing, and a clarification...	Alexander Plotkin	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 03:16:17 +0400	197 lines
Re: Great meeting, open sharing, and a clarification...	Gert Wörheide	Sun, 10 Oct 2010 12:17:52 +0200	157 lines
Re: Books on Brazilian sponges	RIESGO GIL, ANA	Fri, 8 Oct 2010 20:35:02 +0200	257 lines
Bravo Espana! & great seeing everyone	Elizabeth L. McLean	Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:38:51 -0700	96 lines
Books on Brazilian sponges	<>	Thu, 7 Oct 2010 10:54:55 -0300	97 lines
Re: Great Meeting !!!	Elizabeth L. McLean	Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:02:49 -0700	174 lines
Re: Great meeting!!!	Elizabeth L. McLean	Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:51:22 -0700	718 lines
updating sequences	Dorothee Huchon	Wed, 6 Oct 2010 16:04:21 +0100	45 lines
Re: GenBank AF100948 update	John Hooper	Wed, 6 Oct 2010 23:45:31 +1000	195 lines
FW: GenBank AF100948 update	Collins, Allen	Wed, 6 Oct 2010 08:46:17 -0400	172 lines
Antw: Part of Ijima s 1927 sponge collection from the Siboga exped re-emerged	Dorte Janussen	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 16:53:25 +0200	158 lines
Great meeting! Movies available now.	Michael Nickel	Sat, 2 Oct 2010 18:07:23 +0200	250 lines