JISCMail - FRIENDSOFWISDOM-D Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

FRIENDSOFWISDOM-D Archives

August 2006

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		FRIENDSOFWISDOM-D Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	From	Date	Size
Re: Sailboat Leadership	A.D.M.Rayner	Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:10:18 +0100	469 lines
Fw: History of Physics	Roger Anderton	Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:24:04 +0100	775 lines
Re: Sailboat Leadership	Mohamed Yunus Yasin	Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:38:14 +0800	605 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Harvey Sarles	Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:03:46 -0500	94 lines
Sailboat Leadership	A.D.M.Rayner	Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:44:11 +0100	201 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Mohamed Yunus Yasin	Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:51:33 +0800	28 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	ian glendinning	Fri, 25 Aug 2006 03:15:33 +0100	191 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Harvey Sarles	Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:53:07 -0500	2874 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Harvey Sarles	Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:52:54 -0500	102 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Harvey Sarles	Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:21:35 -0500	2874 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	A.D.M.Rayner	Wed, 23 Aug 2006 07:57:13 +0100	2100 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Harvey Sarles	Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:52:19 -0500	105 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	ian glendinning	Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:36:42 -0500	2265 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Harvey Sarles	Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:40:49 -0500	1681 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Harvey Sarles	Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:57:40 -0500	1062 lines
Re: Fungal inclusionality	Karl Rogers	Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:21:40 +0100	68 lines
Re: Fungal inclusionality	A.D.M.Rayner	Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:26:46 +0100	4967 lines
Re: Fungal inclusionality	Karl Rogers	Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:42:40 +0100	32 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	A.D.M.Rayner	Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:03:51 +0100	458 lines
Re: Fungal inclusionality	A.D.M.Rayner	Sun, 20 Aug 2006 09:45:57 +0100	869 lines
Re: Fungal inclusionality	Karl Rogers	Sun, 20 Aug 2006 01:52:29 +0100	29 lines
Re: Fungal inclusionality	Harvey Sarles	Sat, 19 Aug 2006 17:23:04 -0500	596 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Mohamed Yunus Yasin	Sun, 20 Aug 2006 01:37:13 +0800	394 lines
Re: Fungal inclusionality	A.D.M.Rayner	Sat, 19 Aug 2006 10:12:51 +0100	289 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	A.D.M.Rayner	Sat, 19 Aug 2006 10:01:17 +0100	286 lines
Re: Fungal inclusionality	A.D.M.Rayner	Sat, 19 Aug 2006 08:36:41 +0100	1287 lines
Re: Fungal inclusionality	Cherryl Martin	Sat, 19 Aug 2006 00:07:29 +0100	281 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	ian glendinning	Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:18:50 -0500	36 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Isabel Adonis	Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:58:40 +0100	96 lines
Re: Fungal inclusionality	Karl Rogers	Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:20:44 +0100	158 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Harvey Sarles	Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:51:48 -0500	1856 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Cherryl Martin	Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:59:01 +0100	1761 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Harvey Sarles	Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:58:54 -0500	213 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Terry Bristol	Fri, 18 Aug 2006 09:58:31 -0700	793 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Harvey Sarles	Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:47:00 -0500	2813 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Pentcho Valev	Fri, 18 Aug 2006 08:42:36 -0700	48 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Cherryl Martin	Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:47:38 +0100	237 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Cherryl Martin	Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:15:13 +0100	240 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Alan Rayner	Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:53:34 +0100	174 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Cherryl Martin	Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:52:31 +0100	172 lines
Re: Fungal inclusionality	A.D.M.Rayner	Fri, 18 Aug 2006 08:48:00 +0100	1668 lines
Re: Fungal inclusionality	A.D.M.Rayner	Fri, 18 Aug 2006 08:45:14 +0100	440 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Pentcho Valev	Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:03:43 -0700	49 lines
Re: Fungal inclusionality	ted lumley	Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:20:18 -0700	2020 lines
Re: Fungal inclusionality	Karl Rogers	Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:28:11 +0100	69 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Cherryl Martin	Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:13:50 +0100	942 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Cherryl Martin	Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:43:07 +0100	177 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Mohamed Yunus Yasin	Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:23:10 +0800	104 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Cherryl Martin	Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:58:06 +0100	1106 lines
Re: Fungal inclusionality	A.D.M.Rayner	Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:30:18 +0100	881 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Terry Bristol	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:30:37 -0700	220 lines
Re: Fungal inclusionality	Karl Rogers	Thu, 17 Aug 2006 02:31:35 +0100	137 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Harvey Sarles	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:27:35 -0500	370 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Cherryl Martin	Thu, 17 Aug 2006 01:42:06 +0100	463 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Roger Anderton	Thu, 17 Aug 2006 01:32:34 +0100	215 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Cherryl Martin	Thu, 17 Aug 2006 00:26:19 +0100	366 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Harvey Sarles	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:08:04 -0500	27 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Harvey Sarles	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:46:42 -0500	2735 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Tom Milner-Gulland	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:46:15 +0100	20 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Tom Milner-Gulland	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:17:08 +0100	143 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Harvey Sarles	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:15:42 -0500	128 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Tom Milner-Gulland	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:41:16 +0100	105 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Harvey Sarles	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:36:23 -0500	94 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Harvey Sarles	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:34:18 -0500	1197 lines
Re: creationism?	Harvey Sarles	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:29:25 -0500	127 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Tom Milner-Gulland	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:21:09 +0100	82 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Harvey Sarles	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:18:15 -0500	64 lines
Re: creationism?	Harvey Sarles	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:14:58 -0500	220 lines
Fw: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Roger Anderton	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 18:26:21 +0100	52 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Tom Milner-Gulland	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:39:56 +0100	31 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Roger Anderton	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:30:32 +0100	83 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Tom Milner-Gulland	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 12:14:00 +0100	76 lines
Re: Fungal inclusionality	A.D.M.Rayner	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:33:06 +0100	949 lines
Re: creationism?	A.D.M.Rayner	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:26:26 +0100	1980 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Roger Anderton	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:50:47 +0100	55 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Pentcho Valev	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:54:08 -0700	45 lines
Re: Fungal inclusionality	Karl Rogers	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 01:49:22 +0100	569 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Terry Bristol	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:44:12 -0700	1278 lines
Re: creationism?	Terry Bristol	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:34:59 -0700	106 lines
Re: An unwise discussion - Natural Inclusion cf Natural Selection	Rafe CHAMPION	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:25:05 +1000	58 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Roger Anderton	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:16:21 +0100	137 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Harvey Sarles	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:00:52 -0500	963 lines
Re: creationism?	<>	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:24:07 EDT	41 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Karl Rogers	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:19:08 +0100	89 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Pentcho Valev	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:08:51 -0700	44 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Roger Anderton	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:51:52 +0100	96 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	ian glendinning	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:38:27 -0500	461 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Harvey Sarles	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:28:37 -0500	458 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Harvey Sarles	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:22:12 -0500	344 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	ian glendinning	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 08:31:41 -0500	1143 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Pentcho Valev	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 04:45:30 -0700	61 lines
Re: Fungal inclusionality	A.D.M.Rayner	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:33:25 +0100	702 lines
Re: An unwise discussion - Natural Inclusion cf Natural Selection	Cherryl Martin	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:11:09 +0100	1043 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Roger Anderton	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:46:25 +0100	684 lines
Re: An unwise discussion - Natural Inclusion cf Natural Selection	A.D.M.Rayner	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:31:06 +0100	1059 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Rafe CHAMPION	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:28:14 +1000	60 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Pentcho Valev	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:26:14 -0700	34 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Rafe CHAMPION	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:07:41 +1000	83 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Karl Rogers	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 02:59:57 +0100	171 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Tom Milner-Gulland	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 02:53:48 +0100	100 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Terry Bristol	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:10:09 -0700	577 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Rafe CHAMPION	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:54:19 +1000	43 lines
Re: Fungal inclusionality	Karl Rogers	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 01:51:58 +0100	64 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Terry Bristol	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:44:06 -0700	1095 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Karl Rogers	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 01:38:26 +0100	887 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Rafe CHAMPION	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:36:52 +1000	63 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Karl Rogers	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 01:30:24 +0100	645 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Tom Milner-Gulland	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 01:19:01 +0100	118 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Rafe CHAMPION	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:14:00 +1000	42 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Rafe CHAMPION	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:50:05 +1000	90 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Roger Anderton	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 00:11:16 +0100	468 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Tom Milner-Gulland	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:55:30 +0100	40 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	ian glendinning	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:18:44 -0500	383 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Cherryl Martin	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:05:58 +0100	658 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Terry Bristol	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:54:23 -0700	357 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Cherryl Martin	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:56:32 +0100	1708 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Harvey Sarles	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:54:11 -0500	1015 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Harvey Sarles	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:51:13 -0500	305 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	ian glendinning	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:58:26 -0500	36 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Tom Milner-Gulland	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:48:43 +0100	20 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Roger Anderton	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:14:11 +0100	152 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Harvey Sarles	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:44:08 -0500	208 lines
Re: PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Terry Bristol	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:06:13 -0700	295 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Cherryl Martin	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:55:28 +0100	1020 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	ian glendinning	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:23:05 -0500	134 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	A.D.M.Rayner	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:09:50 +0100	119 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Rafe Champion	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 00:56:09 +1000	34 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Harvey Sarles	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:46:45 -0500	47 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Isabel Adonis	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:09:57 +0100	87 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Tom Milner-Gulland	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:37:11 +0100	108 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Rafe Champion	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:17:26 +1000	37 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Isabel Adonis	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:33:52 +0100	35 lines
PHYSICS IN TERMINAL DECLINE	Pentcho Valev	Sun, 13 Aug 2006 23:50:26 -0700	25 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Rafe CHAMPION	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:37:51 +1000	92 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Tom Milner-Gulland	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:27:06 +0100	62 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Rafe CHAMPION	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:07:17 +1000	47 lines
Re: Cosmology from An Engineering Perspective	Pentcho Valev	Sat, 12 Aug 2006 08:00:54 -0700	153 lines
Re: Cosmology from An Engineering Perspective	Tom Milner-Gulland	Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:38:31 +0100	108 lines
Re: Cosmology from An Engineering Perspective	Pentcho Valev	Sat, 12 Aug 2006 04:01:01 -0700	98 lines
Re: Cosmology from An Engineering Perspective	Tom Milner-Gulland	Sat, 12 Aug 2006 11:32:14 +0100	67 lines
Re: Cosmology from An Engineering Perspective	Pentcho Valev	Fri, 11 Aug 2006 23:01:41 -0700	59 lines
Re: Cosmology from An Engineering Perspective	Pentcho Valev	Fri, 11 Aug 2006 22:49:58 -0700	127 lines
CAN SCIENCE EDUCATION BE RESCUED?	Pentcho Valev	Fri, 11 Aug 2006 22:25:15 -0700	72 lines
Re: Cosmology from An Engineering Perspective	Tom Milner-Gulland	Fri, 11 Aug 2006 20:07:58 +0100	36 lines
Re: Cosmology from An Engineering Perspective	Pentcho Valev	Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:21:36 -0700	162 lines
Cosmology from An Engineering Perspective	Terry Bristol	Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:17:32 -0700	218 lines
Re: THE FATALITY OF THE DEDUCTIVE APPROACH	Tom Milner-Gulland	Fri, 11 Aug 2006 18:14:26 +0100	98 lines
Re: THE FATALITY OF THE DEDUCTIVE APPROACH	Pentcho Valev	Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:20:57 -0700	69 lines
Re: THE FATALITY OF THE DEDUCTIVE APPROACH	Tom Milner-Gulland	Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:45:37 +0100	98 lines
Re: THE FATALITY OF THE DEDUCTIVE APPROACH	Pentcho Valev	Fri, 11 Aug 2006 07:10:35 -0700	86 lines
Re: THE FATALITY OF THE DEDUCTIVE APPROACH	Tom Milner-Gulland	Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:40:13 +0100	54 lines
THE FATALITY OF THE DEDUCTIVE APPROACH	Pentcho Valev	Fri, 11 Aug 2006 06:16:12 -0700	43 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Tom Milner-Gulland	Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:51:30 +0100	236 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Tom Milner-Gulland	Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:43:43 +0100	121 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	A.D.M.Rayner	Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:34:04 +0100	167 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Isabel Adonis	Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:08:43 +0100	55 lines
Intro. to my "Nietzsche's Prophecy: the Crisis in Meaning"	Harvey Sarles	Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:35:59 -0500	240 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Tom Milner-Gulland	Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:02:29 +0100	173 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	A.D.M.Rayner	Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:13:05 +0100	1667 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Isabel Adonis	Wed, 9 Aug 2006 19:54:35 +0100	111 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Tom Milner-Gulland	Tue, 8 Aug 2006 13:55:56 +0100	102 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Isabel Adonis	Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:17:06 +0100	63 lines
Re: An unwise discussion?	Tom Milner-Gulland	Mon, 7 Aug 2006 17:42:09 +0100	42 lines
Towards a Pragmatic Perspective of Wisdom ?	ian glendinning	Mon, 7 Aug 2006 09:25:48 -0500	43 lines
An unwise discussion?	Isabel Adonis	Mon, 7 Aug 2006 13:56:19 +0100	23 lines
INCOMMENSURABILITY OF SCIENTIFIC LOGIC AND FORMAL LOGIC	Pentcho Valev	Mon, 7 Aug 2006 01:09:20 -0700	88 lines
Re: EINSTEIN: ETHER PARTLY EXISTS	Roger Anderton	Sun, 6 Aug 2006 09:24:50 +0100	39 lines
Re: EINSTEIN: ETHER PARTLY EXISTS	Tom Milner-Gulland	Sat, 5 Aug 2006 23:13:13 +0100	98 lines
Re: EINSTEIN: ETHER PARTLY EXISTS	Roger Anderton	Sat, 5 Aug 2006 19:36:52 +0100	71 lines
EINSTEIN: ETHER PARTLY EXISTS	Pentcho Valev	Sat, 5 Aug 2006 10:52:48 -0700	42 lines
Re: Fw: WORDS THAT DESTROYED RATIONALITY IN SCIENCE	Pentcho Valev	Wed, 2 Aug 2006 07:45:11 -0700	98 lines
POPPER, EINSTEIN AND INCONSISTENT THEORIES	Pentcho Valev	Wed, 2 Aug 2006 06:26:26 -0700	44 lines
Fw: WORDS THAT DESTROYED RATIONALITY IN SCIENCE	A.D.M.Rayner	Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:28:01 +0100	2883 lines
Re: WORDS THAT DESTROYED RATIONALITY IN SCIENCE	Pentcho Valev	Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:23:19 -0700	100 lines

FRIENDSOFWISDOM-D Archives

August 2006

Options

Subject

From

Date

Size

JiscMail Tools

RSS Feeds and Sharing

Search Archives

Archives