JISCMail - FRIENDSOFWISDOM-D Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

FRIENDSOFWISDOM-D Archives

February 2007

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		FRIENDSOFWISDOM-D Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	From	Date	Size
Re: who is shooting whom ?	tom abeles	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:55:37 -0600	69 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	Cherryl Martin	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:39:33 -0000	425 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	ian glendinning	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:15:17 -0600	34 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	ian glendinning	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:08:10 -0600	77 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	tom abeles	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:57:14 -0600	126 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	ian glendinning	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:54:31 -0600	42 lines
Re: purpose of the university	tom abeles	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:36:19 -0600	119 lines
Re: purpose of the university	tom abeles	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:30:25 -0600	119 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	David M	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:17:03 -0000	85 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	David M	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:15:19 -0000	98 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	Karl Rogers	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:09:09 +0000	146 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	Karl Rogers	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:01:40 +0000	109 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Karl Rogers	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:49:20 +0000	60 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	ian glendinning	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:39:14 -0600	66 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	ian glendinning	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:36:38 -0600	75 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	Karl Rogers	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:54:19 +0000	74 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	David M	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:37:13 -0000	50 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	ian glendinning	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:18:20 +0000	30 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	David M	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:09:14 -0000	488 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	Karl Rogers	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:58:24 +0000	29 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Karl Rogers	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:52:55 +0000	46 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	ian glendinning	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:20:28 -0600	37 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Rafe CHAMPION	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:00:22 +1100	53 lines
Re: purpose of the university	tom abeles	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:42:41 -0600	23 lines
Re: purpose of the university	tom abeles	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:34:12 -0600	111 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Karl Rogers	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:27:55 +0000	124 lines
Re: purpose of the university	tom abeles	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:24:16 -0600	36 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	Karl Rogers	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:21:26 +0000	138 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Rafe CHAMPION	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:19:48 +1100	46 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Karl Rogers	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:15:26 +0000	78 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Karl Rogers	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:12:10 +0000	40 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	tom abeles	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:10:46 -0600	126 lines
Re: purpose of the university	tom abeles	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:02:53 -0600	30 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	tom abeles	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:54:13 -0600	80 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	tom abeles	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:50:24 -0600	58 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Karl Rogers	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:50:16 +0000	40 lines
Re: purpose of the university	tom abeles	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:40:25 -0600	34 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Karl Rogers	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:38:22 +0000	50 lines
Re: purpose of the university	tom abeles	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:35:38 -0600	35 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Rafe CHAMPION	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:23:23 +1100	85 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	Karl Rogers	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:11:37 +0000	412 lines
Re: purpose of the university	tom abeles	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:11:23 -0600	64 lines
Re: purpose of the university	tom abeles	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:56:17 -0600	60 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	Harvey Sarles	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:56:10 -0600	813 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	Karl Rogers	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:51:56 +0000	395 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Karl Rogers	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:47:04 +0000	32 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	Karl Rogers	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:34:59 +0000	39 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	Harvey Sarles	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:34:17 -0600	780 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Karl Rogers	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:32:39 +0000	33 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Karl Rogers	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:29:00 +0000	103 lines
Re: purpose of the university	tom abeles	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:25:50 -0600	240 lines
Re: Pirsig and Whitehead on values	Harvey Sarles	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:20:56 -0600	264 lines
Re: purpose of the university	David M	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:17:39 -0000	58 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	tom abeles	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:11:01 -0600	62 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	David M	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:57:59 -0000	147 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Harvey Sarles	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:54:32 -0600	488 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Harvey Sarles	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:53:16 -0600	166 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Harvey Sarles	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:50:25 -0600	41 lines
Re: Pirsig and Whitehead on values	ian glendinning	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:43:34 -0600	232 lines
Re: Pirsig and Whitehead on values	David M	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:33:15 -0000	219 lines
Re: Morphogenetic field and Unified Field Theory	Roger Anderton	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:12:04 -0000	591 lines
Re: HI	Karl Rogers	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:39:42 +0000	36 lines
Re: HI	Cherryl Martin	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:26:37 -0000	347 lines
Re: HI	ian glendinning	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:24:22 -0600	36 lines
re IAUP commission	Thomas Daffern	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:58:16 -0000	456 lines
Morphogenetic field and Unified Field Theory	Roger Anderton	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 01:19:57 -0000	523 lines
Lancelot Law Whyte article still surviving on wikipedia	Roger Anderton	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 01:19:39 -0000	122 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Karl Rogers	Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:34:01 +0000	454 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Rafe CHAMPION	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:30:57 +1100	54 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Karl Rogers	Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:20:41 +0000	73 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Rafe CHAMPION	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:15:25 +1100	31 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Harvey Sarles	Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:59:11 -0600	45 lines
Re: who is shooting whom ?	Karl Rogers	Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:56:50 +0000	326 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Rafe CHAMPION	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:53:54 +1100	31 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Harvey Sarles	Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:50:52 -0600	271 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Karl Rogers	Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:49:54 +0000	52 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Harvey Sarles	Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:40:16 -0600	547 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Karl Rogers	Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:17:15 +0000	370 lines
Re: Pirsig and Whitehead on values	Harvey Sarles	Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:11:59 -0600	162 lines
who is shooting whom ?	Thomas Daffern	Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:56:22 -0000	287 lines
Re: purpose of the university	tom abeles	Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:37:31 -0600	272 lines
Re: Pirsig and Whitehead on values	David M	Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:17:44 -0000	114 lines
Re: Pirsig and Whitehead on values	David M	Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:15:55 -0000	121 lines
Re: International Association of Critical Realism	David M	Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:06:20 -0000	134 lines
Re: purpose of the university	tom abeles	Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:48:41 -0600	318 lines
Re: purpose of the university	David M	Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:19:57 -0000	283 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Karl Rogers	Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:06:29 +0000	243 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Karl Rogers	Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:57:39 +0000	237 lines
Re: purpose of the university	tom abeles	Sat, 24 Feb 2007 17:42:58 -0600	108 lines
Re: Pirsig and Whitehead on values	Harvey Sarles	Sat, 24 Feb 2007 09:49:06 -0600	97 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Harvey Sarles	Sat, 24 Feb 2007 09:43:57 -0600	412 lines
Re: Pirsig and Whitehead on values	David M	Sat, 24 Feb 2007 13:22:15 -0000	79 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Karl Rogers	Sat, 24 Feb 2007 13:21:23 +0000	78 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Karl Rogers	Sat, 24 Feb 2007 13:10:00 +0000	198 lines
Re: purpose of the university	<>	Sat, 24 Feb 2007 06:36:42 EST	2447 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Harvey Sarles	Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:36:36 -0600	2467 lines
FW: Tramps and whatever	Drs.W.T.M. Berendsen	Sat, 24 Feb 2007 00:16:01 +0100	335 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Drs.W.T.M. Berendsen	Sat, 24 Feb 2007 00:08:10 +0100	115 lines
Re: purpose of the university	tom abeles	Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:17:14 -0600	96 lines
Re: Landmark Education: The Wisdom Courses and knowledge and violence	Karl Rogers	Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:05:44 +0000	13 lines
Re: Landmark Education: The Wisdom Courses	Karl Rogers	Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:00:31 +0000	28 lines
Re: Landmark Education: The Wisdom Courses and knowledge and violence	Karl Rogers	Fri, 23 Feb 2007 18:58:49 +0000	29 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Karl Rogers	Fri, 23 Feb 2007 18:57:59 +0000	37 lines
Re: Landmark Education: The Wisdom Courses	tom abeles	Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:51:27 -0600	54 lines
Re: purpose of the university	tom abeles	Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:37:31 -0600	174 lines
Re: Landmark Education: The Wisdom Courses and knowledge and violence	Thomas Clough Daffern	Fri, 23 Feb 2007 18:31:55 +0000	71 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Karl Rogers	Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:29:29 +0000	51 lines
Re: educational petition on downing street website	Mathew Iredale	Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:59:00 +0000	69 lines
Re: purpose of the university	tom abeles	Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:18:40 -0600	190 lines
Tramps and whatever	Drs.W.T.M. Berendsen	Thu, 22 Feb 2007 23:22:43 +0100	107 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Karl Rogers	Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:03:45 +0000	46 lines
Re: Pirsig and Whitehead on values	Harvey Sarles	Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:20:40 -0600	49 lines
Re: Pirsig and Whitehead on values	David M	Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:27:01 -0000	46 lines
Re: purpose of the university	tom abeles	Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:31:01 -0600	179 lines
Re: knowledge and violence	Harvey Sarles	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:01:00 -0600	702 lines
Re: Pirsig and Whitehead on values	Harvey Sarles	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:52:20 -0600	31 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Karl Rogers	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:16:01 +0000	84 lines
Re: knowledge and violence	Cherryl Martin	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:03:12 -0000	757 lines
Re: knowledge and violence	Karl Rogers	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:51:57 +0000	48 lines
Re: Pirsig and Whitehead on values	tom abeles	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:51:51 -0600	44 lines
Re: knowledge and violence	Drs.W.T.M. Berendsen	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:45:00 +0100	813 lines
Re: purpose of the university	tom abeles	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:30:22 -0600	124 lines
Re: Pirsig and Whitehead on values	David M	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:57:05 -0000	20 lines
Re: knowledge and violence	Thomas Daffern	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:45:28 -0000	658 lines
Re: knowledge and violence	Karl Rogers	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:58:23 +0000	35 lines
knowledge and violence	Thomas Daffern	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:10:23 -0000	288 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Karl Rogers	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:20:07 +0000	44 lines
Re: purpose of the university	tom abeles	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 09:40:29 -0600	153 lines
On tramps and families	Drs.W.T.M. Berendsen	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:57:48 +0100	343 lines
Re: purpose of the university	Karl Rogers	Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:28:19 +0000	47 lines
educational petition on downing street website	Thomas Clough Daffern	Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:06:26 +0000	38 lines
Re: Should Friends of Wisdom be a Society with a Constitution?	Karl Rogers	Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:39:29 +0000	51 lines
Re: Child of Reason	Drs.W.T.M. Berendsen	Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:24:00 +0100	2496 lines
centre for global ethics	Thomas Daffern	Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:49:16 -0000	44 lines
Re: Aims of Friends of Wisdom	tom abeles	Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:00:46 -0600	407 lines
Aims of Friends of Wisdom	Nicholas Maxwell	Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:16:31 -0000	305 lines
Re: Child of Reason	Cherryl Martin	Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:20:17 -0000	2136 lines
Re: Child of Reason	Alan Rayner	Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:52:56 +0000	316 lines
Re: Child of Reason	tom abeles	Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:42:51 -0600	261 lines
Re: Child of Reason	Nicholas Maxwell	Mon, 19 Feb 2007 23:56:39 -0000	179 lines
Re: Child of Reason	tom abeles	Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:57:24 -0600	162 lines
purpose of the university	tom abeles	Sun, 18 Feb 2007 20:32:13 -0600	157 lines
Re: nobel prize for philosophy and world wisdom awards	Rafe CHAMPION	Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:30:32 +1100	54 lines
Re: Should Friends of Wisdom be a Society with a Constitution?	David M	Sun, 18 Feb 2007 21:32:19 -0000	1284 lines
Re: Should Friends of Wisdom be a Society with a Constitution?	Nicholas Maxwell	Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:52:19 -0000	1052 lines
Re: Should Friends of Wisdom be a Society with a Constitution?	Nicholas Maxwell	Sun, 18 Feb 2007 11:49:45 -0000	926 lines
Re: Should Friends of Wisdom be a Society with a Constitution?	Nicholas Maxwell	Sun, 18 Feb 2007 10:30:32 -0000	168 lines
Re: Should Friends of Wisdom be a Society with a Constitution	Nicholas Maxwell	Sun, 18 Feb 2007 09:56:16 -0000	118 lines
Re: Should Friends of Wisdom be a Society with a Constitution?	Gordon Fisher	Sat, 17 Feb 2007 20:18:15 -0500	154 lines
Re: Why fight?	Harvey Sarles	Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:26:06 -0600	1700 lines
Re: Should Friends of Wisdom be a Society with a Constitution	tom abeles	Sat, 17 Feb 2007 15:45:03 -0600	95 lines
Re: Living a Life of Value	Drs.W.T.M. Berendsen	Sat, 17 Feb 2007 19:09:05 +0100	504 lines
Re: Who professes wisdom? (was why fight?)	David M	Sat, 17 Feb 2007 18:04:10 -0000	38 lines
The power of rhetoric and good labels	Drs.W.T.M. Berendsen	Sat, 17 Feb 2007 19:00:14 +0100	112 lines
Re: Why fight?	David M	Sat, 17 Feb 2007 18:00:07 -0000	1936 lines
Re: Popper, postivism and secularism	David M	Sat, 17 Feb 2007 17:52:47 -0000	92 lines
Re: Should Friends of Wisdom be a Society with a Constitution?	Tom Milner-Gulland	Sat, 17 Feb 2007 17:45:28 +0000	190 lines
Re: Living a Life of Value	Nicholas Maxwell	Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:32:17 -0000	1185 lines
Living a Life of Value	<>	Sat, 17 Feb 2007 04:54:53 EST	223 lines
Re: Who professes wisdom? (was why fight?)	Harvey Sarles	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:04:15 -0600	21 lines
Re: Why fight?	Harvey Sarles	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:54:19 -0600	1331 lines
Re: Who professes wisdom? (was why fight?)	Harvey Sarles	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:39:30 -0600	338 lines
Re: Popper, postivism and secularism	ian glendinning	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:52:47 -0600	63 lines
Re: Who professes wisdom? (was why fight?)	ian glendinning	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:32:44 -0600	38 lines
Re: Should Friends of Wisdom be a Society with a Constitution?	Gordon Fisher	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:44:17 -0500	108 lines
Re: DDT?	Karl Rogers	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:37:00 +0000	79 lines
Re: Who professes wisdom? (was why fight?)	Cherryl Martin	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 19:57:13 -0000	604 lines
Re: Should Friends of Wisdom be a Society with a Constitution?	Karl Rogers	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:46:56 +0000	51 lines
Re: Why fight?	Karl Rogers	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:45:14 +0000	58 lines
Re: Who professes wisdom? (was why fight?)	Karl Rogers	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:32:16 +0000	52 lines
Re: Should Friends of Wisdom be a Society with a Constitution?	David M	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:11:13 -0000	107 lines
Re: Why fight?	David M	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:06:43 -0000	160 lines
Re: nobel prize for philosophy and world wisdom awards	Karl Rogers	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:42:12 +0000	38 lines
Re: A Poet's Wisdom	tom abeles	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:09:59 -0600	97 lines
Re: nobel prize for philosophy and world wisdom awards	Tom Milner-Gulland	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:59:18 +0000	17 lines
Re: nobel prize for philosophy and world wisdom awards	Tom Milner-Gulland	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:31:28 +0000	87 lines
Re: A Poet's Wisdom	Cherryl Martin	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:47:25 -0000	759 lines
Re: Who professes wisdom? (was why fight?)	Cherryl Martin	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:36:16 -0000	847 lines
A Poet's Wisdom	bob Macintosh	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:33:58 -0000	253 lines
Re: Who professes wisdom? (was why fight?)	Nicholas Maxwell	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:37:57 -0000	512 lines
Re: Who professes wisdom? (was why fight?)	Cherryl Martin	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 02:29:36 -0000	314 lines
Re: Who professes wisdom? (was why fight?)	tom abeles	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:59:50 -0600	200 lines
Re: DDT?	tom abeles	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:55:53 -0600	131 lines
Re: Who professes wisdom? (was why fight?)	Harvey Sarles	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:32:17 -0600	62 lines
Re: Who professes wisdom? (was why fight?)	Cherryl Martin	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:22:18 -0000	452 lines
Re: Who professes wisdom? (was why fight?)	Karl Rogers	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:31:35 +0000	34 lines
Re: Should Friends of Wisdom be a Society with a Constitution?	Karl Rogers	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:25:11 +0000	30 lines
Re: Why fight?	Karl Rogers	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:23:20 +0000	35 lines
Re: nobel prize for philosophy and world wisdom awards	David M	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:16:02 -0000	49 lines
Re: Child Poverty in the UK	Karl Rogers	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:06:37 +0000	41 lines
Re: Should Friends of Wisdom be a Society with a Constitution?	David M	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:05:49 -0000	329 lines
Re: Why fight?	David M	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:00:25 -0000	1224 lines
Re: DDT?	Karl Rogers	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:56:40 +0000	40 lines
Re: Why fight?	David M	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:49:46 -0000	1502 lines
Re: nobel prize for philosophy and world wisdom awards	ian glendinning	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:46:50 -0600	35 lines
Re: nobel prize for philosophy and world wisdom awards	Karl Rogers	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:39:28 +0000	35 lines
Re: Who professes wisdom? (was why fight?)	David M	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:36:29 -0000	145 lines
Re: Why fight?	Karl Rogers	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:28:19 +0000	40 lines
Re: Child Poverty in the UK	David M	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:07:10 -0000	187 lines
DDT?	tom abeles	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:41:16 -0600	88 lines
Re: nobel prize for philosophy and world wisdom awards	ian glendinning	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:58:01 -0600	59 lines
nobel prize for philosophy and world wisdom awards	Thomas Clough Daffern	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:27:26 +0000	47 lines
a challenge	tom abeles	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:13:36 -0600	37 lines
Re: Why fight?	Cherryl Martin	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:16:09 -0000	2249 lines
Re: Should Friends of Wisdom be a Society with a Constitution?	Jonathan Ward	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:43:54 +0000	318 lines
Re: The Draft Constitution	Anne Adams	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 08:23:14 -0800	289 lines
Re: Why fight?	Karl Rogers	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:56:51 +0000	73 lines
Re: Why fight?	Karl Rogers	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:58:10 +0000	34 lines
Re: Why fight?	Karl Rogers	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:45:32 +0000	206 lines
Re: Why fight?	Karl Rogers	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:38:02 +0000	779 lines
Re: Friends of Wisdom Constitution	Ron Barnett	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:55:41 -0000	1960 lines
Re: Why fight?	Harvey Sarles	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:21:41 -0600	3882 lines
Re: Why fight?	Cherryl Martin	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:43:25 -0000	365 lines
Re: Why fight?	tom abeles	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:26:23 -0600	115 lines
Re: Why fight?	Karl Rogers	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:14:50 +0000	87 lines
Re: Why fight?	Cherryl Martin	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:59:57 -0000	1385 lines
Re: Why fight?	Karl Rogers	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:55:42 +0000	41 lines
Re: Why fight?	Karl Rogers	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:41:38 +0000	38 lines
Re: Why fight?	tom abeles	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:20:52 -0600	1342 lines
Re: Child Poverty in the UK	Karl Rogers	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:16:56 +0000	74 lines
Re: Why fight?	Nicholas Maxwell	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:12:05 -0000	976 lines
Re: Unhooked Thinking 2007 (fwd)	ian glendinning	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:02:27 -0600	80 lines
Re: Why fight?	tom abeles	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:02:15 -0600	106 lines
Who professes wisdom? (was why fight?)	tom abeles	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:33:23 -0600	150 lines
Re: Child Poverty in the UK	Rafe CHAMPION	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:17:11 +1100	60 lines
Re: Why fight?	Cherryl Martin	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:36:36 -0000	2282 lines
Re: Why fight?	Harvey Sarles	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:35:27 -0600	1067 lines
Re: Why fight?	Cherryl Martin	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:35:50 -0000	1006 lines
Re: On the folly of simply drifting....	Cherryl Martin	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:27:01 -0000	221 lines
On the folly of simply drifting....	Karl Rogers	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:11:35 +0000	31 lines
Re: Why fight?	Karl Rogers	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:46:12 +0000	38 lines
Re: Why fight?	Nicholas Maxwell	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:22:54 -0000	182 lines
Re: Why fight?	Karl Rogers	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:51:04 +0000	37 lines
Re: Why fight?	Nicholas Maxwell	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:52:10 -0000	2495 lines
Re: Why fight?	Nicholas Maxwell	Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:52:59 -0000	252 lines
Re: Why fight?	Karl Rogers	Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:38:03 +0000	51 lines
Re: Why fight?	Nicholas Maxwell	Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:22:10 -0000	2491 lines
Re: Why fight?	Karl Rogers	Tue, 13 Feb 2007 22:56:47 +0000	39 lines
Re: Why fight?	Nicholas Maxwell	Tue, 13 Feb 2007 22:40:33 -0000	194 lines
Re: Why fight?	tom abeles	Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:19:27 -0600	1072 lines
Re: Why fight?	Karl Rogers	Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:14:39 +0000	40 lines
Re: Why fight?	Nicholas Maxwell	Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:46:01 -0000	859 lines
Re: Should Friends of Wisdom be a Society with a Constitution?	Harvey Sarles	Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:18:05 -0600	149 lines
Re: Should Friends of Wisdom be a Society with a Constitution?	Karl Rogers	Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:00:07 +0000	55 lines
Re: FOW & Public Awareness	Karl Rogers	Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:30:42 +0000	37 lines
Re: FOW & Public Awareness	Karl Rogers	Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:13:57 +0000	86 lines
Why fight?	tom abeles	Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:25:42 -0600	767 lines
Re: dont give up the fight...	Tom Milner-Gulland	Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:12:22 +0000	40 lines
Re: FOW & Public Awareness	Mathew Iredale	Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:26:50 +0000	50 lines
Re: Should Friends of Wisdom be a Society with a Constitution?	Ron Barnett	Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:59:31 -0000	1433 lines
Re: dont give up the fight...	Harvey Sarles	Sun, 11 Feb 2007 17:32:44 -0600	2109 lines
Re: dont give up the fight...	Nicholas Maxwell	Sun, 11 Feb 2007 23:17:56 -0000	1798 lines
Re: dont give up the fight...	Harvey Sarles	Sun, 11 Feb 2007 16:10:47 -0600	1937 lines
dont give up the fight...	Thomas Daffern	Sun, 11 Feb 2007 19:17:01 -0000	1888 lines
Re: Popper, postivism and secularism	Nicholas Maxwell	Sun, 11 Feb 2007 17:56:30 -0000	218 lines
Re: FOW & Public Awareness	Nicholas Maxwell	Sun, 11 Feb 2007 16:18:40 -0000	1011 lines
Re: Popper, postivism and secularism	Karl Rogers	Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:25:38 +0000	337 lines
FOW & Public Awareness	Karl Rogers	Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:21:02 +0000	36 lines
Re: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change	Karl Rogers	Sun, 11 Feb 2007 14:59:49 +0000	92 lines
Re: Popper, postivism and secularism	tom abeles	Sun, 11 Feb 2007 07:42:51 -0600	206 lines
Re: Popper, postivism and secularism	Wilfred Berendsen	Sun, 11 Feb 2007 14:26:31 +0100	45 lines
Re: Popper	Wilfred Berendsen	Sun, 11 Feb 2007 14:19:15 +0100	20 lines
Re: Popper	Wilfred Berendsen	Sun, 11 Feb 2007 14:14:00 +0100	36 lines
Baranski- Unitary Field Theory - START THE READING!!!!!!!!!	Wilfred Berendsen	Sun, 11 Feb 2007 14:11:20 +0100	50 lines
Re: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change	Wilfred Berendsen	Sun, 11 Feb 2007 13:59:24 +0100	27 lines
Re: Popper, postivism and secularism	Nicholas Maxwell	Sun, 11 Feb 2007 11:18:08 -0000	95 lines
Re: Popper	<>	Sun, 11 Feb 2007 05:32:24 EST	105 lines
Re: Popper	Cherryl Martin	Sat, 10 Feb 2007 23:58:33 -0000	46 lines
Re: Popper	Rafe Champion	Sun, 11 Feb 2007 10:33:22 +1100	33 lines
Re: Popper	David M	Sat, 10 Feb 2007 22:20:13 -0000	94 lines
Re: Popper	David M	Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:44:10 -0000	1099 lines
Re: Popper, postivism and secularism	David M	Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:20:15 -0000	105 lines
Re: Popper	David M	Sat, 10 Feb 2007 20:47:52 -0000	41 lines
Re: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change	Harvey Sarles	Sat, 10 Feb 2007 14:33:25 -0600	358 lines
Re: Popper	David M	Sat, 10 Feb 2007 20:12:37 -0000	65 lines
Re: Political wisdom assessment continued	Thomas Daffern	Sat, 10 Feb 2007 14:52:03 -0000	194 lines
Re: Fw: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change	Karl Rogers	Sat, 10 Feb 2007 13:53:33 +0000	66 lines
Re: Popper	<>	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 17:14:22 EST	42 lines
Re: Fw: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change	ian glendinning	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:42:26 -0600	63 lines
Re: Fw: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change	Karl Rogers	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 20:18:22 +0000	53 lines
Re: Fw: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change	ian glendinning	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:11:32 -0600	89 lines
Re: Fw: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change	Karl Rogers	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 19:27:03 +0000	50 lines
Re: Fw: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change	ian glendinning	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:15:29 -0600	111 lines
Re: Fw: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change	Wilfred Berendsen	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 19:00:27 +0100	102 lines
Re: Fw: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change	Karl Rogers	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 17:27:23 +0000	48 lines
Re: Popper	Wilfred Berendsen	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 18:09:16 +0100	117 lines
Re: Popper?	Alan Rayner	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 16:57:12 +0000	92 lines
Re: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change	Karl Rogers	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 16:47:09 +0000	78 lines
Re: Popper?	ian glendinning	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:41:25 -0600	83 lines
Re: Fw: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change	ian glendinning	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:35:20 -0600	213 lines
Popper?	tom abeles	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:25:27 -0600	67 lines
Re: Popper	ian glendinning	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:57:36 -0600	76 lines
Re: Popper	Cherryl Martin	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:56:26 -0000	54 lines
Re: Popper	Nicholas Maxwell	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:49:18 -0000	61 lines
Re: Popper	ian glendinning	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:47:18 -0600	39 lines
Re: Fw: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change	Cherryl Martin	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:30:32 -0000	538 lines
Re: Popper	Cherryl Martin	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:28:04 -0000	130 lines
Re: Popper	ian glendinning	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:18:36 -0600	100 lines
Re: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change	Alan Rayner	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:33:56 +0000	1123 lines
Re: Popper	Wilfred Berendsen	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:22:59 +0100	32 lines
Re: Popper	Wilfred Berendsen	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:20:34 +0100	36 lines
Re: Fw: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change	Karl Rogers	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:10:07 +0000	53 lines
Re: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change	Nicholas Maxwell	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 12:08:47 -0000	2753 lines
Popper Again	Nicholas Maxwell	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:33:57 -0000	98 lines
Re: Popper	Nicholas Maxwell	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:45:37 -0000	57 lines
Re: Popper	Nicholas Maxwell	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:06:01 -0000	83 lines
Re: Popper	A.D.M.Rayner	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 07:42:58 -0000	34 lines
Re: Popper	Harvey Sarles	Thu, 8 Feb 2007 20:16:13 -0600	22 lines
Re: Popper	Tom Milner-Gulland	Thu, 8 Feb 2007 23:59:48 +0000	16 lines
Popper and Joseph Agassi	Wilfred Berendsen	Thu, 8 Feb 2007 23:23:57 +0100	43 lines
Re: Popper	Rafe CHAMPION	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:20:43 +1100	49 lines
Re: Popper	ian glendinning	Thu, 8 Feb 2007 15:16:14 -0600	73 lines
Re: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change	Karl Rogers	Wed, 7 Feb 2007 20:16:33 +0000	62 lines
Re: Friends of Wisdom	Nicholas Maxwell	Wed, 7 Feb 2007 17:16:16 -0000	88 lines
Re: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change	Harvey Sarles	Wed, 7 Feb 2007 11:01:56 -0600	311 lines
Political wisdom assessment	Richard Trowbrdige	Wed, 7 Feb 2007 10:57:56 -0500	1702 lines
Re: Friends of Wisdom	Cherryl Martin	Wed, 7 Feb 2007 15:43:33 -0000	51 lines
Friends of Wisdom	Wilfred Berendsen	Wed, 7 Feb 2007 16:37:18 +0100	35 lines
Re: Removal from Friends of Wisdom	Nicholas Maxwell	Wed, 7 Feb 2007 09:22:05 -0000	5080 lines
Re: Removal from Friends of Wisdom	Miss Katerina Panagiotakis	Wed, 7 Feb 2007 12:45:39 +1000	2226 lines
Re: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change	Alan Rayner	Tue, 6 Feb 2007 16:50:51 +0000	222 lines
Re: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change	Karl Rogers	Tue, 6 Feb 2007 16:34:04 +0000	208 lines
Re: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change	Wilfred Berendsen	Tue, 6 Feb 2007 00:15:19 +0100	33 lines
Re: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change	David M	Mon, 5 Feb 2007 20:23:37 -0000	256 lines
Re: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change	Nicholas Maxwell	Mon, 5 Feb 2007 19:00:09 -0000	390 lines
wisdom self-audit for political leaders ?	Thomas Clough Daffern	Mon, 5 Feb 2007 18:09:09 +0000	116 lines
Re: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change	Harvey Sarles	Mon, 5 Feb 2007 09:58:39 -0600	146 lines
Re: Fw: Is Man the cause of climate change etc?	Alan Rayner	Mon, 5 Feb 2007 08:51:38 +0000	517 lines
Re: Fw: Is Man the cause of climate change etc?	Miss Katerina Panagiotakis	Mon, 5 Feb 2007 14:06:45 +1000	427 lines
Re: Fw: Is Man the cause of climate change etc?	Jon Bennett	Sun, 4 Feb 2007 13:07:24 -0500	1165 lines

FRIENDSOFWISDOM-D Archives

February 2007

Options

Subject

From

Date

Size

JiscMail Tools

RSS Feeds and Sharing

Search Archives

Archives