JISCMail - EPNL Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

EPNL Archives

June 2013

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		EPNL Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	From	Date	Size
Re: SV: [EPNL] French PN literature [was: Wipers/Trousers]	John Insley	Fri, 5 Jan 2080 11:40:56 +0100	741 lines
Re: French PN literature [was: Wipers/Trousers]	John Insley	Thu, 4 Jan 2080 17:30:56 +0100	643 lines
Re: hallo everyone - CONK/CANK names	Richard Coates	Mon, 24 Jun 2013 17:07:03 +0100	331 lines
Re: hallo everyone - CONK/CANK names	Carole Hough	Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:46:03 +0100	373 lines
Re: recent thesis: Jepson, English place-name elements relating to boundaries	[log in to unmask]	Mon, 24 Jun 2013 17:26:43 +0200	61 lines
Re: hallo everyone - CONK/CANK names	Jeremy Harte	Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:14:18 +0100	300 lines
Re: Islip on the Nene	Tom Ikins	Sat, 22 Jun 2013 23:40:17 +0000	15 lines
Islip on the Nene	Tom Ikins	Sat, 22 Jun 2013 21:01:41 +0000	62 lines
recent thesis: Jepson, English place-name elements relating to boundaries	Keith Briggs	Sat, 22 Jun 2013 10:31:17 +0100	24 lines
Re: Hautot (Seine-Maritime)	[log in to unmask]	Sat, 22 Jun 2013 10:39:21 +0200	63 lines
Re: Hautot (Seine-Maritime)	Anthony Appleyard	Fri, 21 Jun 2013 05:35:34 +0100	18 lines
Hautot (Seine-Maritime)	Keith Briggs	Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:39:18 +0100	97 lines
Re: are Wipers/Trousers names best seen as mnemonics?	Carl Edlund Anderson	Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:43:25 -0500	49 lines
culvert	Gavin Esmond Hodgkinson	Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:51:42 +0200	790 lines
Re: are Wipers/Trousers names best seen as mnemonics?	Jeremy Harte	Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:19:27 +0100	50 lines
Re: are Wipers/Trousers names best seen as mnemonics?	Richard Coates	Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:55:48 +0100	29 lines
Re: are Wipers/Trousers names best seen as mnemonics?	Anthony Appleyard	Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:36:19 +0100	23 lines
Re: are Wipers/Trousers names best seen as mnemonics?	Steve Doerr	Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:52:01 +0100	233 lines
Re: are Wipers/Trousers names best seen as mnemonics?	Jeremy Harte	Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:35:52 +0100	243 lines
Re: Integration of onomastic data into geo-spatial infrastructures	Scott Catledge	Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:58:00 +0000	42 lines
Conderco	Tom Ikins	Tue, 18 Jun 2013 07:28:46 -0400	20 lines
Re: are Wipers/Trousers names best seen as mnemonics?	Steve Doerr	Mon, 17 Jun 2013 20:15:33 +0100	16 lines
Re: French PN literature [was: Wipers/Trousers]	Graham Collis	Mon, 17 Jun 2013 18:39:10 +0100	843 lines
SV: [EPNL] French PN literature [was: Wipers/Trousers]	Peder Gammeltoft	Mon, 17 Jun 2013 18:40:58 +0200	591 lines
1. sorry. 2. do the names Coslany and Wensum (NFK) refer to the same thing?	Nick Corbett	Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:31:01 +0100	57 lines
Re: Durnovaria or Duronovaria?	Tom Ikins	Thu, 13 Jun 2013 23:02:26 +0000	22 lines
Re: Durnovaria or Duronovaria?	Richard Coates	Thu, 13 Jun 2013 23:02:33 +0100	85 lines
Re: Durnovaria or Duronovaria?	Anthony Appleyard	Thu, 13 Jun 2013 22:38:45 +0100	12 lines
Re: Durnovaria or Duronovaria?	Tom Ikins	Thu, 13 Jun 2013 17:52:10 +0000	60 lines
Re: Durnovaria or Duronovaria?	Richard Coates	Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:58:00 +0100	41 lines
Re: Durnovaria or Duronovaria?	Tom Ikins	Thu, 13 Jun 2013 14:46:58 +0000	43 lines
Re: Durnovaria or Duronovaria?	Keith Briggs	Thu, 13 Jun 2013 14:21:27 +0100	29 lines
Durnovaria or Duronovaria?	Tom Ikins	Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:10:34 +0000	26 lines
reponse to thanks for comments	Nick Corbett	Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:58:25 +0100	27 lines
hallo everyone - CONK/CANK names	Nick Corbett	Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:48:16 +0100	34 lines
Re: French PN literature [was: Wipers/Trousers]	Graham Collis	Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:10:50 +0100	606 lines
Re: culvert	Keith Briggs	Tue, 11 Jun 2013 10:18:21 +0100	196 lines
Re: culvert	Carole Hough	Tue, 11 Jun 2013 10:11:45 +0100	184 lines
culvert	Keith Briggs	Tue, 11 Jun 2013 10:00:44 +0100	96 lines
Re: French PN literature [was: Wipers/Trousers]	Keith Briggs	Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:31:43 +0100	251 lines
Re: French PN literature [was: Wipers/Trousers]	[log in to unmask]	Mon, 10 Jun 2013 23:54:57 +0200	180 lines
Re: Zouch	Steve Doerr	Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:45:25 +0100	121 lines
Zouch	Bob Trubshaw	Mon, 10 Jun 2013 10:14:04 +0100	46 lines
Zouch	Keith Briggs	Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:54:00 +0100	88 lines
Re: French PN literature [was: Wipers/Trousers]	Keith Briggs	Sun, 9 Jun 2013 10:40:27 +0100	80 lines
Re: are Wipers/Trousers names best seen as mnemonics?	Richard Coates	Sun, 9 Jun 2013 09:46:16 +0100	74 lines
Re: are Wipers/Trousers names best seen as mnemonics?	Anthony Appleyard	Sun, 9 Jun 2013 09:37:52 +0100	12 lines
Re: are Wipers/Trousers names best seen as mnemonics?	Anthony Appleyard	Sat, 8 Jun 2013 23:14:29 +0100	11 lines
Re: are Wipers/Trousers names best seen as mnemonics?	Carl Edlund Anderson	Fri, 7 Jun 2013 13:54:28 -0500	49 lines
Re: are Wipers/Trousers names best seen as mnemonics?	Richard Coates	Fri, 7 Jun 2013 16:00:53 +0100	36 lines
Re: are Wipers/Trousers names best seen as mnemonics?	Anthony Appleyard	Fri, 7 Jun 2013 15:15:50 +0100	22 lines
Re: are Wipers/Trousers names best seen as mnemonics?	Jeremy Harte	Thu, 6 Jun 2013 12:29:23 +0100	325 lines
are Wipers/Trousers names best seen as mnemonics?	Nick Corbett	Thu, 6 Jun 2013 11:00:49 +0100	44 lines
Message from JISCMail Helpline: lists with public archives	JISCMail Helpline	Wed, 5 Jun 2013 16:23:00 +0100	71 lines
Re: thanks for comments	Jeremy Harte	Tue, 4 Jun 2013 22:40:01 +0100	383 lines
Re: thanks for comments	[log in to unmask]	Tue, 4 Jun 2013 21:44:07 +0200	109 lines
Re: thanks for comments	Keith Briggs	Tue, 4 Jun 2013 15:30:55 +0100	38 lines
Re: thanks for comments	Richard Coates	Tue, 4 Jun 2013 14:23:14 +0100	54 lines
Re: is J. Lacroix correct in translating "Dorn-" as "hill-fort"?	Trevor Ogden	Tue, 4 Jun 2013 14:08:07 +0100	113 lines
Re: is J. Lacroix correct in translating "Dorn-" as "hill-fort"?	Richard Coates	Tue, 4 Jun 2013 13:59:26 +0100	74 lines
Re: is J. Lacroix correct in translating "Dorn-" as "hill-fort"?	Richard Coates	Tue, 4 Jun 2013 13:58:59 +0100	57 lines
Re: is J. Lacroix correct in translating "Dorn-" as "hill-fort"?	Tom Ikins	Tue, 4 Jun 2013 07:49:52 -0400	36 lines
thanks for comments	Nick Corbett	Tue, 4 Jun 2013 11:57:39 +0100	34 lines
Re: do the names Purbeck and Corfe (DOR) refer to the same thing?	Carole Hough	Tue, 4 Jun 2013 11:48:32 +0100	83 lines
Re: is J. Lacroix correct in translating "Dorn-" as "hill-fort"?	Jeremy Harte	Tue, 4 Jun 2013 11:39:50 +0100	69 lines
do the names Purbeck and Corfe (DOR) refer to the same thing?	Nick Corbett	Tue, 4 Jun 2013 11:36:20 +0100	65 lines
is J. Lacroix correct in translating "Dorn-" as "hill-fort"?	Nick Corbett	Tue, 4 Jun 2013 11:10:39 +0100	56 lines
Re: repost: Inkberrow(WOR) and Inkpen (WLT) TBC w/ Interlaken (CH)?	Richard Coates	Mon, 3 Jun 2013 16:29:11 +0100	74 lines
Re: repost: Inkberrow(WOR) and Inkpen (WLT) TBC w/ Interlaken (CH)?	John Briggs	Mon, 3 Jun 2013 15:40:33 +0100	15 lines
Re: repost: Inkberrow(WOR) and Inkpen (WLT) TBC w/ Interlaken (CH)?	John Briggs	Mon, 3 Jun 2013 15:30:06 +0100	16 lines
repost: Inkberrow(WOR) and Inkpen (WLT) TBC w/ Interlaken (CH)?	Nick Corbett	Mon, 3 Jun 2013 15:04:16 +0100	65 lines
are Inkberrow (WOR) and Inkpen (BRK) TBC w/ Interlaken (CH)	Nick Corbett	Mon, 3 Jun 2013 14:27:58 +0100	80 lines
more on W*th- as OW oronymic element	Nick Corbett	Mon, 3 Jun 2013 13:45:46 +0100	20 lines
Aber & Appledore/Barnstable (DEV)	Nick Corbett	Mon, 3 Jun 2013 13:41:17 +0100	26 lines
Glynde	Nick Corbett	Mon, 3 Jun 2013 13:33:41 +0100	17 lines
Re: Culuerdestuna (Sf)	Graham Collis	Mon, 3 Jun 2013 10:34:47 +0100	437 lines
Re: Culuerdestuna (Sf)	Keith Briggs	Mon, 3 Jun 2013 10:14:56 +0100	151 lines
Re: Glynde Reach	Richard Coates	Mon, 3 Jun 2013 09:24:42 +0100	36 lines
Re: Glynde Reach	Richard Coates	Mon, 3 Jun 2013 09:16:44 +0100	28 lines
Southcoterow, Heathrow, and the Black Death	Anthony Appleyard	Sun, 2 Jun 2013 11:26:14 +0100	61 lines
Glynde Reach	Tom Ikins	Sun, 2 Jun 2013 00:18:23 +0000	14 lines
Re: Mechingas	Tom Ikins	Sat, 1 Jun 2013 15:53:56 +0000	26 lines
Mechingas	Nick Corbett	Sat, 1 Jun 2013 13:48:03 +0100	16 lines