JISCMail - DC-USAGE Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

DC-USAGE Archives

October 2001

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		DC-USAGE Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	From	Date	Size
Re: Possible revisions to Usage Board Administrative Processes	Diane I. Hillmann	Wed, 31 Oct 2001 09:58:50 -0500	167 lines
Re: Possible revisions to Usage Board Administrative Processes	Roland Schwaenzl	Tue, 30 Oct 2001 20:52:17 +0100	63 lines
Possible revisions to Usage Board Administrative Processes	Stuart Sutton	Tue, 30 Oct 2001 09:27:20 -0800	457 lines
Minutes from UB meetings in Tokyo	Andy Powell	Sun, 28 Oct 2001 22:12:15 +0000	1888 lines
FW: [agstandards] Agstandards activities at DC-2001	Weibel,Stu	Sun, 21 Oct 2001 23:09:23 -0400	64 lines
Addendum 2 to Oct 22 agenda	Thomas Baker	Fri, 19 Oct 2001 19:04:10 +0200	92 lines
Re: Addendum to agenda; meeting packet	Roland Schwaenzl	Fri, 19 Oct 2001 13:53:55 +0200	19 lines
Archiving the agenda	Thomas Baker	Fri, 19 Oct 2001 12:41:42 +0200	33 lines
Addendum to agenda; meeting packet	Thomas Baker	Fri, 19 Oct 2001 12:36:21 +0200	184 lines
Tokyo agenda - final version	Thomas Baker	Fri, 19 Oct 2001 10:49:43 +0200	500 lines
Re: "next-to-last" draft agenda	Roland Schwaenzl	Thu, 18 Oct 2001 22:16:26 +0200	24 lines
Re: Recording decisions in Tokyo	Andy Powell	Thu, 18 Oct 2001 21:10:19 +0100	48 lines
Re: Norwegian DC-translation	Rebecca S. Guenther	Thu, 18 Oct 2001 14:59:09 -0400	69 lines
"next-to-last" draft agenda	Thomas Baker	Thu, 18 Oct 2001 20:52:44 +0200	224 lines
Re: LC emergency (fwd)	Rebecca S. Guenther	Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:45:09 -0400	57 lines
Recording decisions in Tokyo	Thomas Baker	Thu, 18 Oct 2001 19:35:40 +0200	33 lines
Re: Norwegian DC-translation	Thomas Baker	Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:54:48 +0200	66 lines
FW: DC-Gov	Makx Dekkers	Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:20:11 +0200	2903 lines
Re: Next meeting after Tokyo...?	Thomas Baker	Thu, 18 Oct 2001 11:12:45 +0200	33 lines
Re: LC emergency (fwd)	Thomas Baker	Thu, 18 Oct 2001 10:58:24 +0200	63 lines
LC emergency (fwd)	Andy Powell	Thu, 18 Oct 2001 09:41:46 +0100	47 lines
Re: Draft for discussion--Agents issues	Roland Schwaenzl	Wed, 17 Oct 2001 21:47:52 +0200	69 lines
Re: Draft Status report and deliverables list	Makx Dekkers	Wed, 17 Oct 2001 19:16:48 +0200	60 lines
Re: Next meeting after Tokyo...?	Stuart Sutton	Wed, 17 Oct 2001 09:15:59 -0700	58 lines
Re: Next meeting after Tokyo...?	<>	Wed, 17 Oct 2001 18:15:49 +0200	40 lines
Re: Draft Status report and deliverables list	Rebecca S. Guenther	Wed, 17 Oct 2001 10:58:18 -0400	45 lines
Re: Next meeting after Tokyo...?	Diane I. Hillmann	Wed, 17 Oct 2001 10:48:02 -0400	53 lines
Re: Draft for discussion--Agents issues	Andy Powell	Wed, 17 Oct 2001 15:21:31 +0100	475 lines
Re: Next meeting after Tokyo...?	Rebecca S. Guenther	Wed, 17 Oct 2001 10:09:21 -0400	68 lines
Re: Draft for discussion--Agents issues	Roland Schwaenzl	Wed, 17 Oct 2001 15:58:47 +0200	34 lines
Re: Next meeting after Tokyo...?	Andy Powell	Wed, 17 Oct 2001 14:55:47 +0100	60 lines
Re: Next meeting after Tokyo...?	Rebecca S. Guenther	Wed, 17 Oct 2001 09:46:57 -0400	55 lines
Re: Draft for discussion--Agents issues	Rebecca S. Guenther	Wed, 17 Oct 2001 08:53:17 -0400	448 lines
Re: Next meeting after Tokyo...?	Roland Schwaenzl	Wed, 17 Oct 2001 14:23:06 +0200	20 lines
Next meeting after Tokyo...?	Thomas Baker	Wed, 17 Oct 2001 12:21:55 +0200	44 lines
Re: Draft for discussion--Agents issues	Roland Schwaenzl	Wed, 17 Oct 2001 11:10:00 +0200	67 lines
Re: Draft for discussion--Agents issues	Andy Powell	Tue, 16 Oct 2001 22:49:03 +0100	383 lines
Re: Draft for discussion--Agents issues	Roland Schwaenzl	Tue, 16 Oct 2001 23:19:55 +0200	454 lines
Re: Draft for discussion--Agents issues	Rebecca S. Guenther	Tue, 16 Oct 2001 13:59:44 -0400	36 lines
Re: Draft for discussion--Agents issues	Rebecca S. Guenther	Tue, 16 Oct 2001 13:52:17 -0400	335 lines
Re: Draft for discussion--Agents issues	Diane I. Hillmann	Tue, 16 Oct 2001 13:51:42 -0400	46 lines
Re: Draft for discussion--Agents issues	Andy Powell	Tue, 16 Oct 2001 16:36:46 +0100	291 lines
Draft for discussion--Agents issues	Diane I. Hillmann	Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:41:20 -0400	767 lines
Draft for discussion--Agents issues	Diane I. Hillmann	Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:40:41 -0400	34 lines
Proposed addition to Process document	Diane I. Hillmann	Mon, 15 Oct 2001 13:43:07 -0400	399 lines
Re: URIs	Rebecca S. Guenther	Mon, 15 Oct 2001 08:53:26 -0400	87 lines
Re: URIs	Roland Schwaenzl	Mon, 15 Oct 2001 12:09:04 +0200	68 lines
Re: URIs	Andy Powell	Sun, 14 Oct 2001 20:53:33 +0100	46 lines
Re: URIs	Roland Schwaenzl	Fri, 12 Oct 2001 22:24:06 +0200	35 lines
URIs	Rebecca S. Guenther	Fri, 12 Oct 2001 16:16:10 -0400	23 lines
Re: New version of: Guidelines for registration of vocabulary ... schemes	Roland Schwaenzl	Fri, 12 Oct 2001 14:40:39 +0200	32 lines
Re: Guidelines for Vocabulary and Encoding Scheme Qualifiers	<>	Thu, 11 Oct 2001 14:42:05 +0200	50 lines
Re: Criteria for Evaluating Element and Qualifier Proposals	Diane I. Hillmann	Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:06:05 -0400	65 lines
Usage Board meetings	Rebecca S. Guenther	Wed, 10 Oct 2001 14:44:07 -0400	22 lines
a couple of faq questions	Weibel,Stu	Wed, 10 Oct 2001 08:39:57 -0400	72 lines
Re: Old proposals in process	Rebecca S. Guenther	Tue, 9 Oct 2001 15:56:58 -0400	68 lines
Re: Criteria for Evaluating Element and Qualifier Proposals	Thomas Baker	Tue, 9 Oct 2001 15:25:40 +0200	54 lines
Re: Criteria for Evaluating Element and Qualifier Proposals	Stuart Sutton	Tue, 9 Oct 2001 05:38:19 -0700	44 lines
Re: Criteria for Evaluating Element and Qualifier Proposals	Thomas Baker	Tue, 9 Oct 2001 12:51:32 +0200	36 lines
Re: Criteria for Evaluating Element and Qualifier Proposals	Andy Powell	Tue, 9 Oct 2001 11:16:57 +0100	66 lines
Re: Criteria for Evaluating Element and Qualifier Proposals	Thomas Baker	Tue, 9 Oct 2001 12:06:23 +0200	51 lines
Re: Guidelines for Vocabulary and Encoding Scheme Qualifiers	Thomas Baker	Tue, 9 Oct 2001 11:38:10 +0200	64 lines
Re: Criteria for Evaluating Element and Qualifier Proposals	Andy Powell	Tue, 9 Oct 2001 09:38:43 +0100	33 lines
Re: Guidelines for Vocabulary and Encoding Scheme Qualifiers	Andy Powell	Tue, 9 Oct 2001 09:33:56 +0100	36 lines
Re: New version of: Guidelines for registration of vocabulary ... schemes	Thomas Baker	Tue, 9 Oct 2001 09:53:03 +0200	39 lines
Re: New version of: Guidelines for registration of vocabulary ... schemes	Weibel,Stu	Mon, 8 Oct 2001 16:19:10 -0400	155 lines
New version of: Guidelines for registration of vocabulary ... schemes	<>	Mon, 8 Oct 2001 15:42:47 +0200	48 lines
Re: Grammar problem in dc-registry	Roland Schwaenzl	Thu, 4 Oct 2001 14:25:44 +0200	24 lines
Re: Grammar problem in dc-registry	Rachel Heery	Wed, 3 Oct 2001 22:52:19 +0100	54 lines
Re: Grammar problem in dc-registry	Thomas Baker	Wed, 3 Oct 2001 17:56:22 +0200	32 lines
Re: Old proposals in process	Thomas Baker	Wed, 3 Oct 2001 17:46:25 +0200	53 lines
Re: Grammar problem in dc-registry	Roland Schwaenzl	Wed, 3 Oct 2001 17:31:28 +0200	15 lines
Grammar problem in dc-registry	Thomas Baker	Wed, 3 Oct 2001 15:03:31 +0200	598 lines
Re: Consolidated outcome of July DC-AC review	Thomas Baker	Wed, 3 Oct 2001 14:14:26 +0200	41 lines
"DCMI endorsed" translations?	Thomas Baker	Wed, 3 Oct 2001 10:50:09 +0200	41 lines
Definition of Title	Thomas Baker	Wed, 3 Oct 2001 10:42:19 +0200	70 lines
Re: Agenda priorities (attn: Harry, Stu, Rachel)	Roland Schwaenzl	Tue, 2 Oct 2001 22:58:06 +0200	60 lines
Re: Agenda priorities (attn: Harry, Stu, Rachel)	Thomas Baker	Tue, 2 Oct 2001 17:14:25 +0200	62 lines
Re: Expressing Qualified Dublin Core in RDF / XML	Roland Schwaenzl	Tue, 2 Oct 2001 17:12:44 +0200	20 lines
Re: Expressing Qualified Dublin Core in RDF / XML	Thomas Baker	Tue, 2 Oct 2001 16:55:20 +0200	36 lines
Re: Agenda priorities (attn: Harry, Stu, Rachel)	Roland Schwaenzl	Tue, 2 Oct 2001 16:53:01 +0200	37 lines
Re: Expressing Qualified Dublin Core in RDF / XML	Roland Schwaenzl	Tue, 2 Oct 2001 16:16:31 +0200	18 lines
Agenda priorities (attn: Harry, Stu, Rachel)	Thomas Baker	Tue, 2 Oct 2001 15:13:11 +0200	71 lines
Re: Expressing Qualified Dublin Core in RDF / XML	Thomas Baker	Tue, 2 Oct 2001 14:42:01 +0200	35 lines
Re: Old proposals in process	Roland Schwaenzl	Tue, 2 Oct 2001 14:37:35 +0200	18 lines
Re: Old proposals in process	Thomas Baker	Tue, 2 Oct 2001 11:35:00 +0200	180 lines
Re: Old proposals in process	Stuart Sutton	Mon, 1 Oct 2001 19:57:36 -0700	160 lines
Re: Old proposals in process	Diane I. Hillmann	Mon, 1 Oct 2001 20:04:16 -0400	143 lines
Re: Old proposals in process	Stuart Sutton	Mon, 1 Oct 2001 15:44:26 -0700	133 lines
Re: Old proposals in process	Makx Dekkers	Tue, 2 Oct 2001 00:19:38 +0200	120 lines
Re: Usage Board Web page	Diane I. Hillmann	Mon, 1 Oct 2001 13:32:47 -0400	40 lines
Re: Old proposals in process	Diane I. Hillmann	Mon, 1 Oct 2001 13:08:24 -0400	143 lines
Old proposals in process	Stuart Sutton	Mon, 1 Oct 2001 08:14:12 -0700	126 lines
Re: REVISED AGENDA FOR TOKYO	Stuart Sutton	Mon, 1 Oct 2001 07:13:35 -0700	163 lines
REVISED AGENDA FOR TOKYO	Thomas Baker	Mon, 1 Oct 2001 14:17:23 +0200	131 lines
Usage Board Web page	Thomas Baker	Mon, 1 Oct 2001 13:40:00 +0200	32 lines