|
|
|
Size
|
Re: NEXT MEETING (Traugott?)
|
Thomas Baker |
Thu, 31 Jan 2002 17:55:31 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: NEXT MEETING (Attn Traugott, Haruki)
|
NAGATA, Haruki |
Fri, 1 Feb 2002 00:12:24 +0900 |
43 lines |
NEXT MEETING (Attn Traugott, Haruki)
|
Thomas Baker |
Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:47:41 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: NEXT MEETING (fwd)
|
Thomas Baker |
Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:34:25 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: NEXT MEETING (fwd)
|
Andy Powell |
Thu, 31 Jan 2002 14:28:30 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: NEXT MEETING (fwd)
|
Rebecca S. Guenther |
Thu, 31 Jan 2002 09:21:27 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: NEXT MEETING (fwd)
|
Thomas Baker |
Thu, 31 Jan 2002 12:34:21 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: NEXT MEETING
|
Roland Schwaenzl |
Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:45:05 +0100 |
18 lines |
Re: NEXT MEETING
|
Makx Dekkers |
Thu, 31 Jan 2002 01:13:35 +0100 |
69 lines |
Re: NEXT MEETING
|
Thomas Baker |
Wed, 30 Jan 2002 23:46:31 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: NEXT MEETING
|
Stuart Sutton |
Wed, 30 Jan 2002 14:05:15 -0800 |
60 lines |
NEXT MEETING
|
Thomas Baker |
Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:22:04 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Meeting
|
Roland Schwaenzl |
Wed, 30 Jan 2002 12:26:27 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: Meeting
|
Thomas Baker |
Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:53:02 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: Meeting
|
Stuart Sutton |
Tue, 29 Jan 2002 07:10:41 -0800 |
30 lines |
Meeting
|
Rebecca S. Guenther |
Tue, 29 Jan 2002 09:47:41 -0500 |
17 lines |
Re: Namespace clarification
|
Thomas Baker |
Mon, 28 Jan 2002 07:13:01 +0100 |
126 lines |
Re: Namespace clarification
|
Rachel Heery |
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:58:35 +0000 |
95 lines |
Re: Namespace clarification
|
Rebecca S. Guenther |
Thu, 24 Jan 2002 16:29:09 -0500 |
69 lines |
Re: LOOKING AHEAD
|
Rebecca S. Guenther |
Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:49:55 -0500 |
73 lines |
Re: Namespace poll (attn: Haruki, Rebecca, Traugott)
|
NAGATA, Haruki |
Wed, 16 Jan 2002 10:54:39 +0900 |
146 lines |
Namespace poll (attn: Haruki, Rebecca, Traugott)
|
Thomas Baker |
Tue, 15 Jan 2002 20:59:02 +0100 |
116 lines |
Re: LOOKING AHEAD
|
<> |
Tue, 15 Jan 2002 17:23:40 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: New DC-Education proposal
|
Diane I. Hillmann |
Mon, 14 Jan 2002 16:55:11 -0500 |
127 lines |
Re: New DC-Education proposal
|
Stuart Sutton |
Mon, 14 Jan 2002 10:18:27 -0800 |
542 lines |
New DC-Education proposal
|
Stuart Sutton |
Mon, 14 Jan 2002 10:14:41 -0800 |
1853 lines |
Re: Namespace clarification
|
Rachel Heery |
Mon, 14 Jan 2002 16:49:03 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: Namespace clarification
|
Roland Schwaenzl |
Mon, 14 Jan 2002 17:33:59 +0100 |
79 lines |
Re: Namespace clarification
|
Diane I. Hillmann |
Mon, 14 Jan 2002 10:41:52 -0500 |
68 lines |
Re: LOOKING AHEAD
|
Diane I. Hillmann |
Sun, 13 Jan 2002 20:45:35 -0500 |
68 lines |
Re: Namespace clarification
|
Roland Schwaenzl |
Sun, 13 Jan 2002 17:58:58 +0100 |
59 lines |
Re: LOOKING AHEAD
|
Stuart Sutton |
Sun, 13 Jan 2002 07:35:37 -0800 |
63 lines |
Re: Namespace clarification
|
Stuart Sutton |
Sat, 12 Jan 2002 08:09:01 -0800 |
61 lines |
LOOKING AHEAD
|
Thomas Baker |
Sat, 12 Jan 2002 14:07:40 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: Namespace clarification
|
Andy Powell |
Sat, 12 Jan 2002 08:35:27 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: What is 'simple DC'?
|
Roland Schwaenzl |
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 11:21:30 +0100 |
18 lines |
Re: What is 'simple DC'?
|
Diane I. Hillmann |
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 19:55:10 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: What is 'simple DC'?
|
Diane I. Hillmann |
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 19:55:07 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: What is 'simple DC'?
|
Andy Powell |
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 22:33:58 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: What is 'simple DC'?
|
Andy Powell |
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 22:24:01 +0000 |
29 lines |
Re: What is 'simple DC'?
|
Roland Schwaenzl |
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 21:43:19 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: What is 'simple DC'?
|
Diane I. Hillmann |
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 12:46:18 -0500 |
55 lines |
Re: What is 'simple DC'?
|
Roland Schwaenzl |
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 11:35:50 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: What is 'simple DC'?
|
Rachel Heery |
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 10:23:53 +0000 |
47 lines |
Re: What is 'simple DC'?
|
Roland Schwaenzl |
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 11:18:59 +0100 |
75 lines |
Re: What is 'simple DC'?
|
Andy Powell |
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 23:51:06 +0000 |
43 lines |
Re: What is 'simple DC'?
|
Andy Powell |
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 23:39:35 +0000 |
56 lines |
Usage Board pending documents
|
Stuart Sutton |
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:18:02 -0800 |
514 lines |
Re: What is 'simple DC'?
|
Rebecca S. Guenther |
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:13:15 -0500 |
102 lines |
Re: What is 'simple DC'?
|
Roland Schwaenzl |
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 19:46:14 +0100 |
125 lines |
Re: What is 'simple DC'?
|
Andy Powell |
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:54:02 +0000 |
90 lines |
Re: What is 'simple DC'?
|
Roland Schwaenzl |
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:25:53 +0100 |
147 lines |
Re: What is 'simple DC'?
|
Rachel Heery |
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 10:38:44 +0000 |
90 lines |
What is 'simple DC'?
|
Andy Powell |
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 00:53:03 +0000 |
74 lines |
DCMI best practice for non-DLOs
|
Andy Powell |
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 00:25:30 +0000 |
63 lines |
2 OAI/DCMI issues
|
Andy Powell |
Mon, 7 Jan 2002 23:59:18 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: Encoding schemes for dc:identifier
|
Andy Powell |
Mon, 7 Jan 2002 23:45:48 +0000 |
182 lines |
Namespace clarification
|
Stuart Sutton |
Mon, 7 Jan 2002 13:11:48 -0800 |
429 lines |
FW: DC usage feedback wanted
|
Makx Dekkers |
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 00:48:38 +0100 |
121 lines |
Re: Charter for Type WG
|
Rebecca S. Guenther |
Wed, 2 Jan 2002 09:23:33 -0500 |
138 lines |