|
|
|
Size
|
Latest (final?) revisions to draft UB process doc.
|
Stuart Sutton |
Sat, 22 Dec 2001 10:20:32 -0800 |
527 lines |
UB next face-to-face meeting
|
Stuart Sutton |
Sat, 22 Dec 2001 08:56:06 -0800 |
400 lines |
Re: Question on the process document and categories of DCMI "document s"
|
Diane I. Hillmann |
Fri, 14 Dec 2001 14:38:08 -0500 |
85 lines |
Re: Vocabulary registration process document
|
Roland Schwaenzl |
Fri, 14 Dec 2001 19:03:29 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: Vocabulary registration process document
|
Diane I. Hillmann |
Fri, 14 Dec 2001 09:29:16 -0500 |
66 lines |
Edits to the scheme registration document
|
Stuart Sutton |
Fri, 14 Dec 2001 06:03:46 -0800 |
412 lines |
Re: Vocabulary registration process document
|
Stuart Sutton |
Fri, 14 Dec 2001 05:48:20 -0800 |
364 lines |
Re: Vocabulary registration process document
|
Weibel,Stu |
Fri, 14 Dec 2001 07:57:49 -0500 |
66 lines |
Re: Vocabulary registration process document
|
Diane I. Hillmann |
Thu, 13 Dec 2001 16:17:05 -0500 |
137 lines |
Re: Registering encoding schemes
|
Roland Schwaenzl |
Thu, 13 Dec 2001 21:51:26 +0100 |
70 lines |
Re: Registering encoding schemes
|
Rebecca S. Guenther |
Thu, 13 Dec 2001 15:34:52 -0500 |
99 lines |
Re: generating schemas for DCMI schematics - a proposal
|
Roland Schwaenzl |
Thu, 13 Dec 2001 21:23:32 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: Registering encoding schemes
|
Diane I. Hillmann |
Thu, 13 Dec 2001 12:49:20 -0500 |
83 lines |
Re: Registering encoding schemes
|
Roland Schwaenzl |
Thu, 13 Dec 2001 16:49:42 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: generating schemas for DCMI schematics - a proposal
|
Makx Dekkers |
Thu, 13 Dec 2001 15:06:02 +0100 |
167 lines |
Re: Registering encoding schemes
|
Weibel,Stu |
Thu, 13 Dec 2001 08:53:48 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: Registering encoding schemes
|
Roland Schwaenzl |
Thu, 13 Dec 2001 14:45:15 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: generating schemas for DCMI schematics - a proposal
|
Weibel,Stu |
Thu, 13 Dec 2001 08:23:44 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: generating schemas for DCMI schematics - a proposal
|
Roland Schwaenzl |
Thu, 13 Dec 2001 13:56:02 +0100 |
110 lines |
Re: Registering encoding schemes
|
Roland Schwaenzl |
Thu, 13 Dec 2001 12:12:41 +0100 |
54 lines |
Re: More on UB decisions on proposals
|
Roland Schwaenzl |
Thu, 13 Dec 2001 11:58:07 +0100 |
81 lines |
Re: generating schemas for DCMI schematics - a proposal
|
Rachel Heery |
Thu, 13 Dec 2001 10:18:21 +0000 |
49 lines |
Re: Registering encoding schemes
|
Andy Powell |
Thu, 13 Dec 2001 09:12:41 +0000 |
80 lines |
Re: Registering encoding schemes
|
Stuart Sutton |
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 22:53:58 -0800 |
72 lines |
generating schemas for DCMI schematics - a proposal
|
Weibel,Stu |
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 22:54:42 -0500 |
97 lines |
Registering encoding schemes
|
Weibel,Stu |
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 22:19:50 -0500 |
36 lines |
Vocabulary registration process document
|
Stuart Sutton |
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 15:59:06 -0800 |
431 lines |
Re: More on UB decisions on proposals
|
Stuart Sutton |
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 14:10:29 -0800 |
68 lines |
Re: More on UB decisions on proposals
|
Andy Powell |
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 21:29:52 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: More on UB decisions on proposals
|
Roland Schwaenzl |
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 22:13:57 +0100 |
17 lines |
More on UB decisions on proposals
|
Stuart Sutton |
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 11:29:45 -0800 |
569 lines |
Re: Question on the process document and categories of DCMI "document s"
|
Roland Schwaenzl |
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 19:47:49 +0100 |
89 lines |
Question on the process document and categories of DCMI "document s"
|
Stuart Sutton |
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 09:05:06 -0800 |
97 lines |
Re: Fwd: Re: New version of the process document
|
Roland Schwaenzl |
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 16:36:22 +0100 |
11 lines |
Re: Fwd: Re: New version of the process document
|
Diane I. Hillmann |
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 09:44:11 -0500 |
52 lines |
Re: Fwd: Re: New version of the process document
|
Stuart Sutton |
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 06:28:27 -0800 |
36 lines |
Re: Fwd: Re: New version of the process document
|
Diane I. Hillmann |
Mon, 10 Dec 2001 13:47:38 -0500 |
70 lines |
Re: "Registration" just for dc:subject?
|
Roland Schwaenzl |
Mon, 10 Dec 2001 11:42:47 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: "Registration" just for dc:subject?
|
Stuart Sutton |
Sun, 9 Dec 2001 16:23:10 -0800 |
140 lines |
Re: "Registration" just for dc:subject?
|
Stuart Sutton |
Sun, 9 Dec 2001 15:48:26 -0800 |
145 lines |
Re: "Registration" just for dc:subject?
|
Stuart Sutton |
Sun, 9 Dec 2001 15:19:00 -0800 |
139 lines |
Re: "Registration" just for dc:subject?
|
Diane I. Hillmann |
Sun, 9 Dec 2001 17:07:32 -0500 |
126 lines |
Re: "Registration" just for dc:subject?
|
Stuart Sutton |
Sun, 9 Dec 2001 11:25:40 -0800 |
107 lines |
Re: "Registration" just for dc:subject?
|
Diane I. Hillmann |
Sun, 9 Dec 2001 14:13:00 -0500 |
83 lines |
Re: "Registration" just for dc:subject?
|
Thomas Baker |
Sun, 9 Dec 2001 19:19:24 +0100 |
70 lines |
"Registration" just for dc:subject?
|
Thomas Baker |
Sun, 9 Dec 2001 19:18:40 +0100 |
113 lines |
Re: FW: Problem with our RDF schemas (fwd)
|
Diane I. Hillmann |
Sun, 9 Dec 2001 09:16:29 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: FW: Problem with our RDF schemas (fwd)
|
Andy Powell |
Sun, 9 Dec 2001 08:55:56 +0000 |
100 lines |
Re: FW: Problem with our RDF schemas (fwd)
|
Andy Powell |
Sun, 9 Dec 2001 08:44:33 +0000 |
128 lines |
DCMI Usage Board - Tokyo meetings
|
Andy Powell |
Sun, 9 Dec 2001 08:36:58 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: New version of the process document
|
Stuart Sutton |
Sat, 8 Dec 2001 09:33:20 -0800 |
57 lines |
Re: FW: Problem with our RDF schemas (fwd)
|
Stuart Sutton |
Sat, 8 Dec 2001 07:46:11 -0800 |
64 lines |
Re: FW: Problem with our RDF schemas (fwd)
|
Thomas Baker |
Sat, 8 Dec 2001 16:41:29 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: FW: Problem with our RDF schemas (fwd)
|
Stuart Sutton |
Sat, 8 Dec 2001 06:44:25 -0800 |
87 lines |
Re: FW: Problem with our RDF schemas (fwd)
|
Stuart Sutton |
Sat, 8 Dec 2001 06:28:41 -0800 |
101 lines |
Re: FW: Problem with our RDF schemas (fwd)
|
Diane I. Hillmann |
Sat, 8 Dec 2001 08:38:11 -0500 |
69 lines |
Re: FW: Problem with our RDF schemas (fwd)
|
Andy Powell |
Sat, 8 Dec 2001 10:11:42 +0000 |
51 lines |
Re: One-month-before cutoff date for proposals
|
Roland Schwaenzl |
Fri, 7 Dec 2001 10:34:52 +0100 |
61 lines |
Re: One-month-before cutoff date for proposals
|
Thomas Baker |
Fri, 7 Dec 2001 10:18:14 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: One-month-before cutoff date for proposals
|
Weibel,Stu |
Thu, 6 Dec 2001 19:24:22 -0500 |
69 lines |
Re: One-month-before cutoff date for proposals
|
Diane I. Hillmann |
Thu, 6 Dec 2001 17:26:25 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: One-month-before cutoff date for proposals
|
Diane I. Hillmann |
Thu, 6 Dec 2001 17:25:33 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: One-month-before cutoff date for proposals
|
Roland Schwaenzl |
Wed, 5 Dec 2001 11:10:02 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: One-month-before cutoff date for proposals
|
Thomas Baker |
Tue, 4 Dec 2001 19:45:02 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: One-month-before cutoff date for proposals
|
Roland Schwaenzl |
Tue, 4 Dec 2001 18:41:09 +0100 |
36 lines |
One-month-before cutoff date for proposals
|
Thomas Baker |
Tue, 4 Dec 2001 17:58:47 +0100 |
24 lines |